Hi Frederik
The Overpass query shows me this morning that with your last redaction the
names are back for the 620 highways.
Thanks
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 13:08:42 HAE, Pierre Béland
a écrit :
Re-visiting this changeset I see that of the 620 ways with tag
"source:name"
Re-visiting this changeset I see that of the 620 ways with tag
"source:name"="geobase.ca", 552 ways have no name restored. See for example way
32798176 where I validated the name + added source:name Overpass query
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sh6
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 11:26:3
Great, thanks Frederik.
Pierre
Le mercredi 11 octobre 2017 11:26:35 HAE, Frederik Ramm
a écrit :
Hi,
On 10.10.2017 03:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I still have the raw data and I'll write a quick script
> that finds these cases and restores the names.
Should be done here
https://w
Hi,
On 10.10.2017 03:16, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I still have the raw data and I'll write a quick script
> that finds these cases and restores the names.
Should be done here
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/52829433
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°0
Thanks
Pierre
Le lundi 9 octobre 2017 21:16:19 HAE, Frederik Ramm a
écrit :
Hi,
On 10/10/2017 02:54 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec
> highway names before redaction, validating names with an acceptable
> source + adding s
Hi,
On 10/10/2017 02:54 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec
> highway names before redaction, validating names with an acceptable
> source + adding source:name=geobase.ca.
I took some precautions to "save" names; if you have indeed modified
Hi Frederik, as a bad armchar mapper, I have revised the Quebec highway names
before redaction, validating names with an acceptable source + adding
source:name=geobase.ca. After redaction, names are removed + even if I try to
re-import - review all the conflicts throug JOSM, I loose all my cha
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 21:49, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
> posted the results.
http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/chdr.details
A new list (CSV file) with way id, coordinates, and country/state/county
information. I've eliminated a
Hi Frederik,
That is helpful. Let us know when you have re-executed the analysis and
posted the results.
A list of IDs per county would be helpful. We can work together as US
community to identify viable sources for re-assessing the correct names, as
well as organizing mapping efforts for surveyi
Hi,
On 27.09.2017 06:43, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step
> to gather some feedback on your assessment. Did you receive any? When do
> you think you want to proceed with the redaction? Anything we can do to
> help?
I haven't received
Hi Frederik,
In your email from Aug 28 you proposed to wait a while as a first step to
gather some feedback on your assessment. Did you receive any? When do you think
you want to proceed with the redaction? Anything we can do to help?
I can assist with preparing the MapRoulette challenge to re-ta
On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 3:48 AM, Bianca Hambasan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> We, the map analysts team from Telenav started editing in Phoenix by
> adding and reviewing the road geometry and road name, so we found this
> issue too. In our area of interest, we found about 5 200 ways with this
> tag. We wa
Hi,
We, the map analysts team from Telenav started editing in Phoenix by adding and
reviewing the road geometry and road name, so we found this issue too. In our
area of interest, we found about 5 200 ways with this tag. We want to help with
this since we already edit in the area. Do you have a
Thanks Frederik - I will pass that on to talk-es.
My next question was going to be about name:xx, but you beat me to it!
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Redacting-75-000-street-names-contributed-by-user-chdr-tp5901701p5901775.html
Sent from the General Discussi
Hi,
On 30.08.2017 09:29, alan_gr wrote:
> However there is confusion about the process. Several mappers on talk-es
> think that if the name of the affected streets can be verified using the
> cadastre ahead of time, this will avoid them being deleted. Some mappers
> have already started checking s
(I will continue in Nelson's thread as my post also relates to a specific
"other country")
The impact on Spain is currently being discussed in the talk-es mailing
list:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-es/2017-August/015416.html
Spain has a legitimate source of street names in the f
(sorry to break the thread; I was following the discussion through the
archive, but I wasn't subscribed)
Simon Poole wrote:
> Our concern should be more about Mexico, Brazil and other countries
> where it is at least not obvious to me if the local communities are
> aware of the issue and if we hav
Simon Poole wrote
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you want to do, but it would seem as if that
just amounts to doing the work twice.
After revising 126 elements, I agree with Simon. Let's avoid doing the job
twice.
Below is an evaluation for Quebec / Canada with a sample of 126 of 1,316 id's
fr
Am 28.08.2017 um 14:43 schrieb Pierre Béland:
> Simon Poole wrote
>
> PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are
> legit is a bit iffy, consider Circle vs. Circuit and other
> expansions that you often can't decide without external
> sources, I don
Simon Poole wrote
PS: naturally simply assuming that all name expansions are legit is a bit iffy,
consider Circle vs. Circuit and other expansions that you often can't decide
without external sources, I don't know if there are any such cases in the
affected data, but it seems to be silly to s
Am 28.08.2017 um 12:16 schrieb James:
> As Stewart has pointed out there are some changes that are valid(name
> expansion). I think Mr.Ramm needs to revise his selection algorithm
> before mass deletion
I'm not quite sure why we are again discussing the center of the known
universe again, but I d
On balance I'd go rip it out then go back in and clean it up.
Cheerio John
On 27 August 2017 at 12:04, James wrote:
> As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
>
> When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be
> hard to validate streetname
Then it wouldn't be hard either to add the names again from a legal source
after the redaction.
> El 27 ago 2017, a las 13:04, James escribió:
>
> As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
>
> When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be
As Mr.Ramm said, there can be trap streets, which should be removed.
When I inspected the data, it seems most of it is in Québec and wouldnt be
hard to validate streetnames for 1400 something items.
On Aug 27, 2017 11:24 AM, "Paul Norman" wrote:
> On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
>
>> I
Either directly or indirectly, and it is a suggestion only.
Cheerio John
On 27 August 2017 at 11:21, Paul Norman wrote:
> On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
>
>> I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were more
>> than likely derived from CANVEC sources
>>
>
> What
What do you think is google source for names in Canada ;)
Pierre
De : Paul Norman
À : talk@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Dimanche 27 août 2017 11h24
Objet : Re: [OSM-talk] Redacting 75, 000 street names contributed by user chdr
On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
>
On 8/27/2017 7:26 AM, john whelan wrote:
I would suggest that any street names added by chdr in Canada were
more than likely derived from CANVEC sources
What makes you believe this to be so?
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.
As James said earlier, canvec/geobase opendata provides the street names. This
can be easily corrected. But we need to establish a procedure and identify
which ways chdr originally added the name.
We can look simply at the history with a link to the OSM APIexample adding the
id after way/ :
htt
In Canada as James has said CANVEC which has been accepted as Open Source
acceptable to OSM has most street names in Canada. There are a few
exceptions locally where the city has renamed streets and these changes
have not yet been reflected in CANVEC.
I would suggest that any street names added b
If we validate via survey say in Canada, will we be able to remove the id
from the revert list? Canada has Canvec we can reference to as well as
OpenStreetCam and Mapillary
On Aug 27, 2017 9:50 AM, "Frederik Ramm" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>in 2010 I was privately contacted by another OSM user with the
30 matches
Mail list logo