Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-08-01 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:58 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance of nodes missing from the minutely diffs. This is a known issue but I'm not sure if we have a trac ticket for it. I have put more details into the trac ticket.

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-08-01 Thread Tom Hughes
On 01/08/09 01:08, Andrew Ayre wrote: How exactly is that supposed to help? Will this API have access to some magic accelerator technology that the current API doesn't use? It would help because people could upload large data sets as fast as they can prepare them, then tweak any problems

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-08-01 Thread Emilie Laffray
Tom Hughes wrote: Excuse me a minute while I find my magic wand... [ time passes ] ...found it! fx: waves wand There you go, changeset processing is now 100 times faster. Once you are done with your magic wand, do you mind lending it to me, I have a server to optimize. Emilie Laffray

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-08-01 Thread Andrew Ayre
Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 15:58 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance of nodes missing from the minutely diffs. This is a known issue but I'm not sure if we have a trac ticket for it. I have put more details into the

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Marc Schütz
Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks now. There's definitely something wrong here:

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Jon Burgess
2009/7/31 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net: Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks now. There's definitely something wrong

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Marc Schütz
The building called Angewandte Informatik is a multipolygon, which has been moved one and a half weeks ago. Both the old and the new shape are rendered now, and the hole is filled too. I know that there have been problems with multipolygons and diffs. Are they supposed to be fixed?

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Andrew Ayre
Jon Burgess wrote: 2009/7/31 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net: Wrong, osm2pgsql does process relations properly. If they aren't then Jon Burgess is happy to take a look to see if he can fix the problem with osm2pgsql. Second there has been no planet reload for a few weeks now. There's definitely

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: Done. See: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118 I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today. Thanks! As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance of nodes missing from the

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Andrew Ayre
Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: Done. See: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118 I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today. Thanks! As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance of nodes

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Andrew Ayre
Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:36 -0700, Andrew Ayre wrote: Done. See: http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2118 I add add tickets for the other two issues I referred to later today. Thanks! As Shaun mentioned in another email, this seems to be another instance of nodes

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Tom Hughes
On 31/07/09 23:55, Andrew Ayre wrote: I think if the OSM API was improved so it could accept large changesets faster then that would greatly help out the people who are trying to add large amounts of data. So far I haven't see a fast and reliable method. Excuse me a minute while I find my

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-31 Thread Andrew Ayre
Tom Hughes wrote: On 31/07/09 23:55, Andrew Ayre wrote: I think if the OSM API was improved so it could accept large changesets faster then that would greatly help out the people who are trying to add large amounts of data. So far I haven't see a fast and reliable method. Excuse me a

[OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-30 Thread Andrew Ayre
Take a look at this boundary where a forest and national park meet: http://osm.org/go/TwUljNo-- Notice that the boundaries don't line up. This is because the national park is in slightly the wrong place. The national park is this changeset uploaded yesterday:

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-30 Thread Karl Newman
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote: Take a look at this boundary where a forest and national park meet: http://osm.org/go/TwUljNo-- Notice that the boundaries don't line up. This is because the national park is in slightly the wrong place. The

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-30 Thread Apollinaris Schoell
I don't know what the Osmarender update speed is or how to mark tiles as dirty or find out when they were rendered, so I am unsure if Osmarender tiles can be directly compared. osmarender doesn't work currently for large areas defined by relation boundaries there is a lonly white

Re: [OSM-talk] Something Might be Broken

2009-07-30 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 31 Jul 2009, at 04:41, Karl Newman wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 7:29 PM, Andrew Ayre a...@britishideas.com wrote: Take a look at this boundary where a forest and national park meet: http://osm.org/go/TwUljNo-- Notice that the boundaries don't line up. This is because the national