Felix Hartmann schrieb:
I think the main part that has to be done here is that ferries, or
motorails however as well aerialways get connected to the main road
network using lines (routing over polygons is so complicated that no
router will soon master it in a useful way).
How they are
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:14 PM, Carsten Moeller cmindivid...@gmx.de wrote:
I do agree. Railways, aerialway etc. should be connected to highways.
But this should not be expressed by connecting same nodes. Here ramps or
links come into play. If you have a closer look at todays OSM-Data
I think
A highway=steps would imply you can use your car here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Steps.jpg
You wouldn't *seriously* consider driving up or down a flight of
steps...surely??
If I understood the intention correctly then highway is something you can
drive on.
No. The
Richard Bullock schrieb:
A highway=steps would imply you can use your car here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Steps.jpg
You wouldn't *seriously* consider driving up or down a flight of
steps...surely??
If I understood the intention correctly then highway is something you
Richard Bullock schrieb:
A highway=steps would imply you can use your car here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Steps.jpg
You wouldn't *seriously* consider driving up or down a flight of
steps...surely??
If I understood the intention correctly then highway is something you
Richard Bullock wrote:
A highway=steps would imply you can use your car here.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Steps.jpg
You wouldn't *seriously* consider driving up or down a flight of
steps...surely??
The Italian Job? ;-)
___
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Am 15.01.2010 23:02, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
yes, osm relations are one possible solution. But from the view of a
pgRouter it is a very stony way to collect that data back into a routing
table. You are right, that there should be a tag like terminal or
ramp or even
Am 16.01.2010 10:16, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
Yes, I do agree. We should have tags describing short and long
distances. The latter is possibly best expressed by using relations.
Yes, there are already tags for our problem:
highway=service
amenity=ferry_terminal (if it allows cargo=vehicle)
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Am 16.01.2010 10:16, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
Yes, I do agree. We should have tags describing short and long
distances. The latter is possibly best expressed by using relations.
Yes, there are already tags for our problem:
highway=service
amenity=ferry_terminal (if it
I think the main part that has to be done here is that ferries, or
motorails however as well aerialways get connected to the main road
network using lines (routing over polygons is so complicated that no
router will soon master it in a useful way).
How they are connected should be dependant on
Hey folks,
first of all I'll have to apologize my bad english.
I also hope that this is the right place for my question.
I'm playing around with pgRouting and OSM - mainly in the north of
Germany. (Schleswig-Holstein / Hamburg)
I came across some annoying issues.
There are several islands that
Am 15.01.2010 15:43, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
Hey folks,
first of all I'll have to apologize my bad english.
I also hope that this is the right place for my question.
I'm playing around with pgRouting and OSM - mainly in the north of
Germany. (Schleswig-Holstein / Hamburg)
I came across
Ulf Lamping schrieb:
Am 15.01.2010 15:43, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
Hey folks,
first of all I'll have to apologize my bad english.
I also hope that this is the right place for my question.
I'm playing around with pgRouting and OSM - mainly in the north of
Germany. (Schleswig-Holstein /
Am 15.01.2010 23:02, schrieb Carsten Moeller:
yes, osm relations are one possible solution. But from the view of a
pgRouter it is a very stony way to collect that data back into a routing
table. You are right, that there should be a tag like terminal or
ramp or even simpler link.
Seems
14 matches
Mail list logo
