Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-16 Thread Richard Fairhurst
NopMap wrote: > It's good that most of Britain has been processed, but it > appears that the two areas containing London have failed > repeatedly. As they probably contain the most complex > data and highest density, I think they are critical and if > they cannot be processed I'd expect the bot

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-16 Thread Robert Kaiser
Richard Weait schrieb: On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:41 AM, NopMap wrote: What exactly does the status "failed" mean? Sometimes it means a timeout of some sort. Other times it means data was found that was unexpected in some way. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Redaction_bot_progress_map Ac

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-16 Thread Richard Weait
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 7:41 AM, NopMap wrote: > What exactly does the status "failed" mean? Sometimes it means a timeout of some sort. Other times it means data was found that was unexpected in some way. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Redaction_bot_progress_map

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-16 Thread NopMap
What exactly does the status "failed" mean? It's good that most of Britain has been processed, but it appears that the two areas containing London have failed repeatedly. As they probably contain the most complex data and highest density, I think they are critical and if they cannot be processed I

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot

2012-07-14 Thread Simon Poole
PS: most of the UK and all of Ireland has worked on. If anybody finds issues outside of the regions that have only been partially processed, please bring them to the attention of the team working on the redaction. Am 14.07.2012 11:55, schrieb Simon Poole: > > There are currently three open issues

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot

2012-07-14 Thread Simon Poole
There are currently three open issues that we know of, for one we probably have a solution. The issue that has a fixed will probably turn up in continental Europe a lot (relations that switch back and forward between MP and boundary) so we definitely want to have that in place and tested before m

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot

2012-07-14 Thread Petr Morávek [Xificurk]
Toby Murray wrote: > Well, today the bot made it through a good chunk of the UK. It stopped > for the night before getting through all of Scotland. I was just wondering, why was the bot stopped? Are there any problems that need to be looked into? And what exactly is "night"? It's always night some

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-13 Thread Toby Murray
Well, today the bot made it through a good chunk of the UK. It stopped for the night before getting through all of Scotland. Here is a visualization of its changes for the day: http://i.imgur.com/cOO37.png Also, I think this has already made it to a couple of mailing lists but in case someone mis

Re: [OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-12 Thread Toby Murray
Andy just pointed out that it should probably be mentioned that you only need to mess with the osmosis state file if your osmosis was up to date with planet.osm.org when the invalid diffs were generated and it progressed beyond sequence number 141272. I believe Grant deleted the invalid diffs pret

[OSM-talk] Update on redaction bot and minutely diffs

2012-07-12 Thread Toby Murray
As I mentioned yesterday, the bot caused some problems with minutely diffs. Andy just sent a more detailed message about the technical problems to the rebuild list but here is a quick update for the user side of things. Some invalid diffs were generated yesterday. These have been removed from plan