[OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-19 Thread Peter Miller
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 09:16:47 -0700 From: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ? To: Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 On Mon, Aug

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-18 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Earl wrote: On 04/08/2008 11:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is duplicated. I was wondering: How good/easy

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-18 Thread Karl Newman
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Robert (Jamie) Munro [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 David Earl wrote: On 04/08/2008 11:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-13 Thread Karl Newman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sounds like you're looking for this:

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-12 Thread Matthias Julius
Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag This can not cross way

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-07 Thread Matthias Julius
Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag This can not cross way boundaries. If someone splits that way in between to and from there is a problem. Matthias

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-07 Thread Karl Newman
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 2:11 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: Karl Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_Tag This can not cross way boundaries. If someone splits that way in

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-06 Thread Erik Johansson
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Robin Paulson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2008/8/6 Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Karl Newman wrote: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_ Tag Segmented tags doesn't

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-06 Thread Stefan Neufeind
Matthias Julius wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (vegard) writes: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:07:24AM -, m*sh wrote: On Mon, August 4, 2008 10:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-06 Thread vegard
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:20:32AM +0200, Stefan Neufeind wrote: This leads me to another thought: How do editors handle cases where a way is member of a relation and you split it? Would make sense to add both parts to the relation imho. Does somebody know how editors handle that

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-06 Thread Dave Stubbs
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:35 AM, vegard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 11:20:32AM +0200, Stefan Neufeind wrote: This leads me to another thought: How do editors handle cases where a way is member of a relation and you split it? Would make sense to add both parts to the

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-05 Thread Matthias Julius
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (vegard) writes: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:07:24AM -, m*sh wrote: On Mon, August 4, 2008 10:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-05 Thread Dave Stubbs
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 5:49 PM, Matthias Julius [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (vegard) writes: On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:07:24AM -, m*sh wrote: On Mon, August 4, 2008 10:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-05 Thread Ben Laenen
On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Karl Newman wrote: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_ Tag Segmented tags doesn't solve data duplication for dual carriage ways, or a set of roads with lots of cul-de-sacs with the same name, and

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-05 Thread Robin Paulson
2008/8/6 Ben Laenen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Tuesday 05 August 2008, Karl Newman wrote: Sounds like you're looking for this: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Relations/Proposed/Segmented_ Tag Segmented tags doesn't solve data duplication for dual carriage ways, or a set of roads with

[OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-04 Thread vegard
For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is duplicated. I was wondering: How good/easy would it be to make a superway-relation to fix that? I.e. group several ways for labeling-intentions?

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-04 Thread m*sh
On Mon, August 4, 2008 10:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is duplicated. I was wondering: How good/easy would it be to make a superway-relation to fix that?

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
H, m*sh wrote: But matter of factly a similar idea crosses my mind from time to time. Proposing a tag-combination: label=yes name = Mainstreet (e.g.) displayzoom = 12 This is not a similar thought. The original poster talked about combining ways to form relations, thus informing the

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-04 Thread vegard
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 11:07:24AM -, m*sh wrote: On Mon, August 4, 2008 10:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is duplicated. I was wondering: How

Re: [OSM-talk] superways as relations ?

2008-08-04 Thread David Earl
On 04/08/2008 11:14, vegard wrote: For naming of streets in cities, where properties change very often and you have to make many small ways, it sometimes gets annoying that the name is duplicated. I was wondering: How good/easy would it be to make a superway-relation to fix that? I.e. group