The new color looks even worse in non-garden areas where the new
building color vanishes into the residential area background.
Old and new colors in Kópavogur, Iceland:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/vo7pyhsuciqlppq/z16.png?dl=0
Old color in Maun, Botswana:
I'm in the bar
Le 4 janv. 2015 10:11, Badita Florin baditaflo...@gmail.com a écrit :
Din cauza vremii ne vom vedea la pranz direct la have a cigar
2015-01-03 23:10 GMT+02:00 talk-ro-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
Send Talk-ro mailing list submissions to
talk-ro@openstreetmap.org
To
On 03/01/15 08:21, Andreas Labres wrote:
On 02.01.15 19:25, Michael Maier wrote:
nördlich von Graz gibt es ja die beiden Orte Gratwein und Gratkorn. Für
Gratwein (westlich der Mur) gibt es einen Place-Node, für Gratkorn
(östlich der Mur) keinen. Ging der irgendwann verloren?
Deleted 7
May I suggest the following work flow:
1) Agree upon 2 dates sufficiently spaced i.e. 2 weeks apart
2) First date, add the new tag, leave the old tag in the system. This will not
break anything, and from that date data consumers know they can start migrating
their renderers, harvesters, or
Pozdrav,
nisu, sav kod je u HTML datotekama, naslovi su meni bili podsjetnici koji
primjer koda ide slijedeći.
Dražen
On 30.12.2014 20:27, Matija Nalis wrote:
nisu li na slideovima bili oni primjeri koda? (ostalo mi je nekako
kao da je bilo?)
Ovdje je pola slideova prazno (samo naslov)?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 04/01/2015 11:46, emmexx ha scritto:
Volevo sapere se c'e' qualche tag o valore particolare da assegnare
ad una piazza che e' inclinata. Da un lato si trova a livello della
sede stradale, dall'altro e' sopraelevata al di sopra di un
edificio.
I stand corrected. Thanks
On 04/01/2015 12:49, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer,
on peut dire ça si 'est comme tu le sens et c'est ce que tu veux décrire.
Il n'y a pas de terme unique consacré avec les usages (parfois abusés)
qu'on trouve en anglais où ce genre de terme finalement assez vague pris
tout seul se met un peu à toutes les sauces.
Le 3 janvier 2015 08:53, Manfred
Il 01/04/2015 12:33 PM, girarsi_liste scrisse:
Dai un'occhiata al tag incline [0], è indicato per una higway, però,
una piazza di solito è taggata da noi come higway=pedestrian, quindi
sono accettati i valori in percentuale od in gradi.
A parte che stiamo parlando di un'area e non so bene come
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 04/01/2015 12:44, emmexx ha scritto:
Il 01/04/2015 12:33 PM, girarsi_liste scrisse:
però, una piazza di solito è taggata da noi come
higway=pedestrian
A parte che stiamo parlando di un'area e non so bene come si
potrebbe usare il tag incline
Hi
As has been pointed out, there was a discussion which all were invited
to join in.
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer, which is
Il 4 gennaio 2015 12:33, girarsi_liste liste.gira...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Dai un'occhiata al tag incline
Ovviamente incline non serve a nulla, dato che una piazza è una highway CHIUSA.
Altrimenti ci sarebbe il tag quote
Tag è chiave+valore. Se intendi chiave quote ha zero usi su taginfo.
Se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 04/01/2015 13:06, Mauro Costantini ha scritto:
Tag è chiave+valore. Se intendi chiave quote ha zero usi su
taginfo.
Se hai valori esatti puoi usare
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ele su punti singolari.
No, intendevo il tag ele,
Also none of the demos linked had Landuse=residential as background -
the lack of contrast there as buildings merge into the landuse is my
biggest issue with this change.
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that tag
- you are not supposed to map for the renderer
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
IMO (why do people use 'H' to say there opinion is honest? Surely all
opinion is that?), the new appearance is better. As can be seen from
Andreas image the building's numbers are much clearer, which is more
worthwhile than viewing the exact, intricate outline
Þann 4.1.2015 12:15, skrifaði Maarten Deen:
On 2015-01-04 11:33, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
Note that there was Request for feedback: new building colours
in openstreetmap-carto thread before this change was made.
I missed that, but it was only a two day discussion where I see people
for and
On 04/01/15 12:04, Dave F. wrote:
As has been pointed out, there was a discussion which all were invited
to join in.
In the past these have not been discussions since in many cases the
changes have already been made! And a couple of days over a holiday
period when people are away from their
Et là encore celles passées en niveau 10 devraient être en niveau 9, car ce
ne sont PAS des fusions simples mais des communes associées. Elles
persistent en tant que communes et non en tant que simples quartiers !!!
Le 3 janvier 2015 19:30, didier2020 didier2...@free.fr a écrit :
Le vendredi 02
On 04/01/15 12:50, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that tag
- you are not supposed to map for the renderer but if the default
renderer makes the buildings nearly impossible to see if they are on top
of Landuse=Residential then
From: Stefan Keller sfkel...@gmail.com
Hi all
Have a look at POITour: http://poitour.ch ...
It's a semester thesis project prototype (open source) of a student
here at Geometa Lab.
Hi Stefan,
extend the search to work also outside Switzerland and add routing for
cycle tourists, then you
Hi Jóhannes
It was a reply to the thread in general the OP; your post just
happened to be last. However, I think I did reply to a couple of your
points:
I prefer the new rendering
Addresses are clearer (which you appear to agree with)
Accurately draw building outlines, whilst giving the map
Il 4 gennaio 2015 13:24, girarsi_liste liste.gira...@gmail.com ha scritto:
A vedere la foto però, quella piazza è il tetto di un'edificio, quindi
per me è il caso di orientarsi in questo senso, building=roof [0]
[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Droof
No. Come ben specificato
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 04/01/2015 14:30, Mauro Costantini ha scritto:
No. Come ben specificato nel wiki che tu stesso hai linkato i
tetti sono oggetti che hanno almeno due lati aperti «Use
building=roof for roofs which are open at least at two sides» e
dalla foto di
Quand c'est le no, d'une route reliant deux communes A et B; sur le
territoire de A c'est route de B et sur le territoire de B c'est route
de A.
Simple, et la coupure est sur la frontière entre les deux communes.
Cas particulier, parfois cette route longe une partie de leur frontière sur
un
Il 01/04/2015 02:33 PM, girarsi_liste scrisse:
Per me è un tetto, se building=roof non è indicato restano sempre i
tag roof:*=*
E' un tetto solo da un lato, dall'altro e' a livello strada, quindi il
problema e' solo spostato... :-)
ciao
maxx
Il 01/04/2015 01:06 PM, Mauro Costantini scrisse:
Layer serve proprio ad evitare la confusione.
Ricordo che layer ha un significato esclusivamente locale per il punto
di sovrapposizione di due oggetti: non si estende nulla agli altri
oggetti circostanti.
Il fatto che la passerella abbia layer=1
On 04/01/2015 12:50, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson wrote:
Also none of the demos linked had Landuse=residential as background -
the lack of contrast there as buildings merge into the landuse is my
biggest issue with this change.
However this seems to be a nice way of telling us to stop using that
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the new building colour is being lost against a very similar
contrast landuse
I'd hardly describe it as lost.
On 04/01/2015 14:08, Lester Caine wrote:
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the
Il 12/05/2014 09:21 PM, emmexx scrisse:
Ho notato che col nuovo rendering o forse a seguito di interventi sui
dati conseguenti le recenti inondazioni milanesi, che a zoom abbastanza
bassi appare la label Fiume Olona lungo la circonvallazione esterna di
Milano.
Tutto cio' e' molto bello ma forse
Søndag den 4. januar 2015 14:08:55 skrev Lester Caine:
On 04/01/15 13:57, Dave F. wrote:
landuse=residential building=yes are not mutually exclusive.
Landuse=Residential is useful to show the extent of towns etc without
the overhead of detailing all the buildings.
But the new building
On Sat, Jan 03, 2015 at 05:22:17PM +, Chris Hill wrote:
On 03/01/15 16:50, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
in accordance to the mechanical edit policy, I'd like to open the
discussion on this list:
a recently approved proposal introduced new tags for pipelines and
marker [1] and changed an
On 04/01/2015 13:01, Lester Caine wrote:
Perhaps now is the time to be looking again at real time rendering
with a selectable style sheet, or perhaps simply a base layer on top
of which different languages and styles can be selected.
That sort of thing has been suggested before(1) but having
Ho notato che a Ferrara [1] gli edifici importati un paio di anni fa da
mcheck [2] non corrispondono agli edifici veri e propri del Db Topografico
regionale, ma ai cassoni edilizi [3].
Sarebbe opportuno sostituirli tutti con i dati corretti degli edifici del
DBTR [4] o ancor meglio con le unità
I like how churches have a darker colour. I'd like for schools, hospitals
and other more important buildings to also have the darker colour.
2015-01-04 18:34 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk:
On 04/01/2015 13:01, Lester Caine wrote:
Perhaps now is the time to be looking again at
see https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1176 for
special redering of elements tagged both as building=* and historic=castle.
You may create github issue(s) with additional suggestion(s) for detecting
that building is
important.
2015-01-04 18:57 GMT+01:00 Janko Mihelić
2015-01-03 21:43 GMT-04:00 Álvaro Monares G. amona...@dcc.uchile.cl:
Lo que no encuentro es como nombrar la carretera a la que hace referencia,
tengo de la 5 Sur y de la
S-199 Que une Freire con Curarrehue, pasando por Villarrica y Pucón (Tengo
hasta Pucón).
Por ahora mi opción es colocar un
Din cauza vremii ne vom vedea la pranz direct la have a cigar
2015-01-03 23:10 GMT+02:00 talk-ro-requ...@openstreetmap.org:
Send Talk-ro mailing list submissions to
talk-ro@openstreetmap.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
Hi!
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
/al
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 2015-01-04 09:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
Hi!
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
Agreed. Left is old, right is new.
Regards,
Maarten
Bonjour a tous,
c'est toujours la : http://osm2020.free.fr/qa-commune/suivi-cadastre.htm
nouveautés pour 2015 :
- la base de données exclus les iles anglo-normandes et Genève.
- Top 10 des modifications (nombre de creation,modification ou
effacement par user) entre 2 analyses (maintenant
Am 31.12.2014 um 18:14 schrieb Lars-Daniel Weber:
.
Are these objects to be released in ODbL and have they to be given back to
the community?
Since the CC-BY-SA tiles might have some generalisation (smoothing,
selection), this license also has to be encountered.
.
IMHO it really
On 04/01/15 08:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
I disagree. The new building colour looks much better than the old one,
IMHO.
HTH
On 2015-01-04 11:02, Tom Hughes wrote:
On 04/01/15 08:22, Andreas Labres wrote:
The old building colour looks much better than the new one, IMHO:
https://www.openstreetmap.at/karte/Wolfersberg-alt-neu.png
Especially in garden districts.
I disagree. The new building colour looks much
Hi all
Have a look at POITour: http://poitour.ch ...
It's a semester thesis project prototype (open source) of a student
here at Geometa Lab.
Yours, Stefan
2014-11-27 8:50 GMT+01:00 Volker Schmidt vosc...@gmail.com:
For bicyles:
I know of four outdoors GPS devices that do this, using
Bonjour
En corrigeant des erreurs via QA_script de JOSM, je constate des
probable erreurs de cadastre :
- Présence d'un bâtiment sur une parcelle, alors que le cadastre dit
qu'il n'y a rien
- Présence d'une parcelle avec une adresse à dix_lieux des autres de la
même adresse
- Double nom et
Note that there was Request for feedback: new building colours
in openstreetmap-carto thread before this change was made.
IMHO it is much better - on low zoom levels maps is now less cluttered
and on high zoom levels POIs are now more visible.
2015-01-04 9:22 GMT+01:00 Andreas Labres
Volevo sapere se c'e' qualche tag o valore particolare da assegnare ad
una piazza che e' inclinata. Da un lato si trova a livello della sede
stradale, dall'altro e' sopraelevata al di sopra di un edificio. In
quest'ultima parte si trova anche una passerella che ovviamente ha layer
1. E' un
I don't care much for specific colours but I would like the original
differentiation between building types to be kept or improved. It was
more subtle than the proposed important buildings style, but was
nice visually and useful.
I understand this change was mostly a rewrite and so keeping
Sven Geggus schrieb:
malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote:
Nun™ ist es möglich, bei http://opengeofiction.net Phantasieländer zu
erstellen. Wer erstellt Lummerland neu?
Wers hochladen mag, hier ist es:
http://geggus.net/osm/lummerland.osm
Ich habe es nun hochgeladen, bis auf die Küste war es sehr
*Bonjour à toutes et à tous.*
*La prochaine réunion des contribu(trices)teurs à OpenStreetMap de
Marseille et région, *
*se tiendra ce lundi 5 janvier 2015 dès 20h00.*
*Voir ces liens pour plus d'informations
:http://openstreetmap.fr/node/18631 http://openstreetmap.fr/node/18631 *
Gente,
nos preguntan por la hora de la reunión...proponía las 16.00 hrs...
¿cómo lo ven? ¿alguna otra propuesta?
saludos!
___
Talk-pe mailing list
Talk-pe@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-pe
Hi everyone
Just launched this onto talk gb and also our blog.Let's see what happens!
Regards
Brian
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
Talk-gb-westmidlands@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb-westmidlands
2015-01-04 14:57 GMT+01:00 emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it:
Volendo fare i pignoli il punto in cui la passerella si collega alla piazza
e' un punto in cui i 2 oggetti si sovrappongono. In questo caso avremmo
quindi u punto che si trova sia a layer 1 che a layer 0.
Usando terminologia matematica
Lists lists at gimnechiske.org writes:
This should be the general rule for mechanical edits when migrating
tagging schemes.
Fair enough when there is a clear use that this fosters but it is unclear
whether that is true here. As a community we have to make sure that trolls
and others without our
malenki o...@malenki.ch wrote:
Ich habe es nun hochgeladen, bis auf die Küste war es sehr schnell
gerendert: http://opengeofiction.net/#map=19/18.96348/164.82950
Hihi da bräuchte man mehr als Zoomlevel 19
Sven
--
/* Fuck me gently with a chainsaw... */
(David S. Miller in
Holger Jeromin gm...@katur.de wrote:
Die Diskussion hatten wir längst.
Jepp. Ich möchte eigentlich ein Wildcard-Zertifikat für
*.openstreetmap.de haben. Ich hoffe wir kriegen das mit der
Überprüfung für den FOSSGIS e.V. bei Startssl endlich mal hin.
Gruss
Sven
--
Dynamische IP-Nummern
2015-01-04 15:34 GMT+01:00 emmexx emm...@tiscalinet.it:
Continuo questa mia battaglia solitaria contro il fiume Olona sulla mappa!
Leggendo per altri motivi il wiki relativamente al tag layer, ho notato
queste indicazioni:
Rivers and streams should not be tagged with layer -1 along long
I would also like to add my thanks. It was good to meet up with others. The
format, of walking together, stopping for lunch and then splitting up to cover
more ground worked well for me. I did overlap a little with Andy but it was
good to walk West and fully appreciate Hanbury's location.
Il 01/04/2015 09:14 PM, Any File scrisse:
Questo è un problema che c'è sempre quando mappi rampe di scale (ma mi
è sempre sembrato di capire che il tag layer non servisse tanto per
dire a quale altezza si trovi una cosa, ma a dire quale è più inalto e
pertanto va mappato rispetto agli altri).
Il 01/04/2015 09:43 PM, Any File scrisse:
Per tutte le altre tue considerazioni: boh, non volevo fare nulla senza
consigli opinioni di persone piu' esperte.
Penso (ma occorrerrebe avere conferme da fonti più attendibili) che lì
la metropolitana sia sotto il fiume.
Sicuramente. se passi in
AH Fair enough when there is a clear use that this fosters but it is unclear
AH whether that is true here. As a community we have to make sure that trolls
AH and others without our best interests at heart do not abuse our norms for
AH there own ends.
are you referring to me and the pipeline
Rainer Fügenstein rfu at oudeis.org writes:
are you referring to me and the pipeline proposal? if yes, I'll
withdraw the MEP proposal, since I don't want to be a troll.
Sorry not to make myself clear. The comment was not aimed at you and I would
like to make clear that I support the mass edit
Olá a todos, queria-vos perguntar o que acham da seguinte proposta em que
irei discutir uma maneira de uniformizar o modo como classificamos as
nossas estradas.
Procuro um modelo que é mais similar com o método de classificação de
outros países em que regem pela condição física da via e não pela
Dear all,
A couple or comments:
- We are aware that not everyone likes the new colours, but the
comments we received (both here and on Github) indicates that a
majority prefers lighter colours.
- Can anyone who dislikes the new building colours please indicate
which hardware you are using when
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:18:57AM -0200, Lists wrote:
May I suggest the following work flow:
1) Agree upon 2 dates sufficiently spaced i.e. 2 weeks apart
2) First date, add the new tag, leave the old tag in the system. This will
not break anything, and from that date data consumers know
On Jan 4, 2015, at 21:11, Richard Z. ricoz@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 09:18:57AM -0200, Lists wrote:
May I suggest the following work flow:
1) Agree upon 2 dates sufficiently spaced i.e. 2 weeks apart
2) First date, add the new tag, leave the old tag in the system. This
El 04-01-2015 a las 5:04, Marco Antonio escribió:
2015-01-03 21:43 GMT-04:00 Álvaro Monares G. amona...@dcc.uchile.cl
mailto:amona...@dcc.uchile.cl:
Lo que no encuentro es como nombrar la carretera a la que hace
referencia, tengo de la 5 Sur y de la
S-199 Que une Freire con
Am 02.01.2015 um 21:44 schrieb Federico Cortese cortese...@gmail.com:
In definitiva in questo modo
si impone che amenity=place_of_worship sia necessariamente collegato
ad un building=*, mentre per le aree pertinenziali o i luoghi di culto
senza fabbricati si utilizzerebbe il
2015-01-03 8:39 GMT+01:00 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com:
2015-01-02 22:48 GMT+01:00 sabas88 saba...@gmail.com:
Ciao,
mi sa che l'hanno rilasciato subito...
https://c.tile.openstreetmap.org/17/68787/47453.png
non sto capendo come mai genova la vedo col nuovo stile, mentre trento
con
70 matches
Mail list logo
