Ahoj,
mám takový nováčkovský dotaz, na který jsem nenašel žádnou radu.
Mapuji tak, že když někde jdu a cesta není na mapě, tak ji dokreslím.
Pokud přijdu ke křižovatce, kde z té cesty odbočuje další cesta, jak to
zakreslit?
Ignorovat tu odbočující cestu? Nebo zakreslit prvních pár metrů, abych
Solved!!! (& I'm an idiot! :-()
Just realised that I had previously selected to hide boundaries, to stop
admin boundaries cluttering up the screen while doing things. Switched
boundaries back on, refreshed & there you are!
So, today's new thing that I have learned is that "boundaries" are all
I believe Toronto has been waiting a couple of years for approval from the
LWG to give you some idea of time frames.
Cheerio John
On Mon, 22 Apr 2019 at 18:05, Jarek Piórkowski wrote:
> Hi Joshua,
>
> Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> To answer your first question: the
Thanks everyone!
You convinced me not to try to move the boundary!
I'm tempted to do as you suggest Warin & delete the natural=wood cover for
the whole area, then re-do it just for the actual tree coverage, which
would / should then make the other details visible.
But I still can't "see" the
Bonsoir à tous
Le consensus suivant semble s'établir pour les cas suivants :
* Ligne électrique hors tension et toujours présente : disused:power=line
* Ligne électrique visible sur les vues aériennes, mais supprimée du
terrain : removed:power=line
TOUTEFOIS :
Avec le mécanisme (complexe) des
Hi Joshua,
Welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions!
To answer your first question: the non-building data sets (parks,
address points, bus stops, etc) are not currently importable without
further effort: we would have to get that exact licence (with text
including "City of Airdrie")
Hallo,
die Wochennotiz Nr. 456 mit vielen wichtigen Neuigkeiten aus der
OpenStreetMap-Welt ist da:
http://blog.openstreetmap.de/blog/2019/04/wochennotiz-nr-456/
Wusstet ihr, dass ihr auch selbst Meldungen für die Wochennotiz
einreichen könnt, ohne Mitglied zu sein? Einfach auf
John, that was an outstanding overview of and answer to today's quite workable process. I can only dream that this be written up in whatever now guides this effort in OSM (BC2020 wiki, whatever). Congratulations on developing what looks like it now does allow and will eventually better allow
For building footprints there are two sources of open data that are
correctly licensed. One is Microsoft's building footprints and the other
is the Stat Can released data. The Stats Canada data is basically the
municipal data released under the federal government's licence.
I suggest you first
Tack för heads up här.
Jag har börjat jobba med datan för Härnösands kommun. Det finns så många
konflikter att jag vald att inte importera delar av den (landuse=forest)
som redan täcker 95% av all skog i kommunen och bara ta scrub och annat med.
Återstår att se om detta resterande går lätt att
liste DOT girarsi AT posteo DOT eu je 22.4.2019 ob 17:47 napisal:
Il 22/04/19 16:04, Bertu90 ha scritto:
Concordo, però occorrerebbe ragionare ulteriormente sul termine
"administrative" dato che comunque il GAL ha un ruolo di sostegno delle
strategie di sviluppo locale e quindi tramite
While I don't see anything in the license that wouldn't be compatible with
OSM except maybe the attribution placement: as osm maintains licenses on
the wiki and not in the data it's kind of "not the same project" and you'd
have to ask city if attribution in the wiki would be sufficient then go
Ingen fara
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 21:43 +0300, Grigory Rechistov via Talk-se wrote:
> Jo, det var inte något gammalt basdata, det var mitt eget misstag.
> Jag förväxlade nämligen mellan de mängder filer som hade "Stockholm"
> i namnet och laddade upp en tidigare version som hade kvar alla dumma
>
Hi Joshua,
The national data that gets mentioned here is actually municipal data
rolled up into one federated Federal dataset to avoid licensing issues
since the federal license has been approved by OSM.
As for the national import, that's for others to update you on
---
Kevin (Kevo)
On
Hello everybody!
Relatively new mapper here. I've been working on mapping my home town, and a
couple of other places I've been, for the past 3 or 4 months.
I have found that my city of Airdrie, AB has a number of datasets available
under an Open Data Licence:
Det är min iakttagelse också. Det är helt enkelt bäst att undvika att
importera i tätorter. Jag tror inte att man förlorar speciellt mycket
heller då de flesta tätorter redan är bra mappade. Det är nog relativt
enkelt att bara plocka bort den data manuellt som överlappar med tätorter
då man går
A reminder that our April meeting will be at the Lincolnshire Poacher from
19:30 tomorrow evening. We'll be meeting at Left Lion at 18:30 to check for
& map any changes in the city centre. I'll try & think a bit about areas
most needing an update.
More on the wiki:
Apr 21, 2019, 11:03 PM by i...@zverev.info:
> Please, could we have a deletion policy in our wiki that clearly states "No
> obsolete pages here", forbidding deletion of anything except spam or
> otherwise harmful pages? Deleting our history is plain vandalism
>
Please note that by using
Jo, det var inte något gammalt basdata, det var mitt eget misstag. Jag
förväxlade nämligen mellan de mängder filer som hade "Stockholm" i namnet och
laddade upp en tidigare version som hade kvar alla dumma artefakter.
JOSM-valideringen hjälpte inte (det granskar inte att t ex en byggnad korsar
Am 22.04.19 um 12:37 schrieb Simon Poole:
> The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
> ago, in March 2018.
>
> Implying for rhetorical purposes that "nothing has changed" is rather
> disingenuous.
>
> Simon
>
> Am 22.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Ilya Zverev:
>> This
-- Forwarded message -
Van:Ilya Zverev
Date: do 18 apr. 2019 23:26
Subject: [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap Awards 2019 Call for Nominees is open!
To: Talk Openstreetmap
Hi folks,
'Tis that time of the year: only a week until SotM Call for Papers
closes, and time to think not only of
Hi,
On 4/22/19 11:59, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> This attitude: “to do well we would need people responsible and there isn’t
> any; you can do your thing without OSM infrastructure so why bother; nobody
> died, stop your hype and comply” — is why we’re still with API 0.6 ten years
> after it was
Hej, det var jag som gjorde morgonens import. Förlåt för besväret det skapade.
Antagligen var mitt exportdata för gammalt som användas som areans basskikt.
Låt mig granska lokalt konflikternas natur och återvända med fler detaljer.
>Понедельник, 22 апреля 2019, 10:59 +03:00 от Snusmumriken
>:
Hi all,
The next OSM US Virtual Mappy Hour is this Wednesday at 6pm PT / 9PM ET!
If you want to do a 5 minute presentation / lightning talk / discussion starter
about anything OSM related, yes please! Please feel free to add your topic to
the wiki[1] or just email me and we will make it happen.
Ahoj,
tak první nástřel je v souboru czech_republic_ee.map a je k tomu třeba i
aktualizace vzhledu, zatím jen v paws_4 a paws_4_LE. Beru všechna id
uzlů co jsou v JSON a ikonka rozcestníku má pak červený okraj. Až
proběhne aktualizace tak to bude i v czech_republic_gccz.map i v
ostatních
Was this new/improvement additions or bug/maintenance fix?
DaveF
On 22/04/2019 11:37, Simon Poole wrote:
The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
ago, in March 2018.
Implying for rhetorical purposes that "nothing has changed" is rather
disingenuous.
Simon
Am
The surveyors are volunteers who are trained by the National Park to
undertake periodic surveys of PROWs, monitoring the condition of paths,
stiles, bridges, surface etc and reporting back to the Ranger team. I do
not have a link - it is a leaflet issued to surveyors on the training
course,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 4:31 PM Michael Sidoric via Talk-us
wrote:
> Another consideration is accessibility.
> Not taking sides but besides aesthetics and nomenclature seems there needs to
> be some way for routing and tags to reflect whether a route is ‘safe’ or
> accessible.
>
> I map for
Parkraumbewirtschaftung ist unter bestimmten Umständen schon möglich, siehe
Beschluss des VG Gelsenkirchen vom 23.01.2014, Az.: 14 L 1856/13.
Wird z.B. im Hafengebiet Eckernförde praktiziert.
Am Fr., März 29, 2019 at 9:55 schrieb Florian Lohoff: On Thu,
Mar 28, 2019 at 10:46:28PM +0100,
If the whole issue is optimizing search results, lets just create an
"Archive" namespace that is not included in search by default. Moving to
archive is different from deleting because only admins can see deleted
content.
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 4:11 AM Lester Caine wrote:
> On 22/04/2019
Il 22/04/19 16:04, Bertu90 ha scritto:
> Concordo, però occorrerebbe ragionare ulteriormente sul termine
> "administrative" dato che comunque il GAL ha un ruolo di sostegno delle
> strategie di sviluppo locale e quindi tramite strumenti di programmazione
> europea condivide progetti tra operatori
On 22/04/2019 15:34, Roger Calvert wrote:
The Lake District National Park instructions to footpath surveyors
recommends:
"Where there are two items of furniture for the same crossing (for
example, a gate and a stile alongside each other), then it is the one
highest up the hierarchy .. or the
Il 22/04/19 16:48, Andrea Enzo ha scritto:
> Buongiorno,
> Per una friggitoria può essere utilizzato oltre ad amenity=restaurant
> restaurant:type:it=* proposto nel 2012 da Martin?''
> Grazie.
> Andreas
esiste cuisine=fried_food, oppure cuisine=friture.
On Mon, 2019-04-22 at 15:34 +0100, Roger Calvert wrote:
> The Lake District National Park instructions to footpath
> surveyors
> recommends:
>
>
>
> "Where there are two items of furniture for the same crossing
> (for
> example, a gate and a stile alongside each other), then
Buongiorno,
Per una friggitoria può essere utilizzato oltre ad amenity=restaurant
restaurant:type:it=* proposto nel 2012 da Martin?''
Grazie.
Andreas
--
Inviato dal mio dispositivo Android con K-9 Mail. Perdonate la brevità.___
Talk-it mailing list
On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 7:22 PM Rihards wrote:
> On 19.04.19 19:34, Kevin Kenny wrote:
> > (There's also a law that snowshoes or skis are required
> > once the snow is 20 cm deep, but I follow "don't tag the local
> > legislation". There's nothing in that law regarding crampons, but any
> > time
Hola, el semanario Nº 456, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11906/
¡Disfruta!
¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser
miembro? Simplemente ingresa a
Hola, el semanario Nº 456, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11906/
¡Disfruta!
¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser
miembro? Simplemente ingresa a
Hola, el semanario Nº 456, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11906/
¡Disfruta!
¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser
miembro? Simplemente ingresa a
Hola, el semanario Nº 456, el sumario de todo lo que está ocurriendo en el
mundo de openstreetmap está en línea en *español*:
http://www.weeklyosm.eu/es/archives/11906/
¡Disfruta!
¿Sabías que también puedes enviar mensajes para la nota semanal sin ser
miembro? Simplemente ingresa a
The Lake District National Park instructions to footpath surveyors
recommends:
"Where there are two items of furniture for the same crossing (for
example, a gate and a stile alongside each other), then it is the one
highest up the hierarchy .. or the one definitely on the definitive
line,
Concordo, però occorrerebbe ragionare ulteriormente sul termine
"administrative" dato che comunque il GAL ha un ruolo di sostegno delle
strategie di sviluppo locale e quindi tramite strumenti di programmazione
europea condivide progetti tra operatori pubblici e privati.
Nel caso invece in cui
Il 22/04/19 15:10, Bertu90 ha scritto:
> Buongiorno a tutti e grazie per l'attenzione, mi trovo a dover mappare un
> ente di compartecipazione sia pubblica che privata a cui fanno parte più
> comuni. Essendo stato utilizzato un tag non corretto mi rivolgo a voi per
> capire come mantenere il
I recently found this gate which I think everyone walks around, but I'll
probably map it as on the route of the footpath when I get around to looking
through all the photos from that day.
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/w2kvnsbGoKkhgIKFMsksLg
Ed
From: SK53
Buongiorno a tutti e grazie per l'attenzione, mi trovo a dover mappare un
ente di compartecipazione sia pubblica che privata a cui fanno parte più
comuni. Essendo stato utilizzato un tag non corretto mi rivolgo a voi per
capire come mantenere il lavoro fatto ed assegnargli un tag appropriato.
If I have the patience, I split them:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/51.40349/-2.44502
The PROW ref should go over the stile's way even if the gate is always
open - it's up the walker to decide which to use (even if the choice is
obvious)
DaveF
On 22/04/2019 13:43, Martin Wynne
I will often map both the track through the gate & the path over the stile.
It's usually a matter of judgement as to whether the line of the PRoW
should go over the stile or through the gate. It's not unusual to find a
moribund stile in such circumstances, which I map as a standalone node.
Keeping
Often in my travels I come across something like this:
http://85a.uk/stile_gate2_1280x720.jpg
http://85a.uk/stile_gate_1280x720.jpg
Should this be mapped as a stile or a gate? Or both side by side?
If the latter, which node should the way be connected to?
It's a public right of way on
On 22/04/2019 11:45, Ilya Zverev wrote:
It’s history.
Ilya ... it's the same problem we have with with a lot of the historic
material. Personally I'd prefer to see the history accessible in some
way, be it the history of the development of a area of mapping data, or
the history of how we got
It’s history.
Why do we keep buildings and roads in the OSM database, that were demolished
years ago? They are still there, versions 1 and 2, deleted by an active mapper.
Why do we keep mailing lists archives from 2004? To argue with points made by
people that left the project a decade ago?
The last functional addition to the editing API was just over a year
ago, in March 2018.
Implying for rhetorical purposes that "nothing has changed" is rather
disingenuous.
Simon
Am 22.04.2019 um 11:59 schrieb Ilya Zverev:
> This attitude: “to do well we would need people responsible and there
Of course, being a wiki, it isn't actually deleted, just marked as deleted. But
looking at it now I can't see why we'd still want it in the wiki, asking people
to use possibly no longer existent api end points to test software that long
since has been tested.
Ed
This attitude: “to do well we would need people responsible and there isn’t
any; you can do your thing without OSM infrastructure so why bother; nobody
died, stop your hype and comply” — is why we’re still with API 0.6 ten years
after it was introduced.
Ilya
> On 22 Apr 2019, at 09:35, Jochen
Hej listan
Jag tog och reverterade importen som gjordes i morse
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/69441387
Orsaken var de omfattande konflikter som uppstod med befintlig data.
___
Talk-se mailing list
Talk-se@openstreetmap.org
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 12:03:40AM +0300, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> In my research of API 0.6 (which turned ten years old yesterday) I've
> stumbled on this page:
>
> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/API_v0.6/Crowd_sourced_Testing
>
> It was deleted 7 years ago. And this is a disaster. The page
The national park way 104759342 is tagged
natural=wood
this will probably cover any other land cover tags you add under the
national park.
Delete the tag natural=wood for the national park way - as I have done
for various national parks and you can then add the land covers without
getting
56 matches
Mail list logo
