It was merely in response to Greg Troxel's comment.
"In the case of your transit system, what were the key problems, and how
were they overcome? I suspect that history is very useful for others."
Cheerio John
Dave F wrote on 11/29/2022 3:13 PM:
Sorry, but I'm unclear what that detailed
Sorry, but I'm unclear what that detailed story has to do with my point?
DaveF
On 29/11/2022 16:54, John Whelan wrote:
The story of the Ottawa bus stops...
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
The story of the Ottawa bus stops started when the City decided to
announce the bus stops in an automated way to assist blind people. To do
this they went round every bus stop with very accurate GPS equipment so
the bus stops were measured to within a meter or so accuracy. One or two
weren’t
On 28/11/2022 23:48, Tobias Knerr wrote:
we would like to offer data donors a standard legal text that they can
use to make their data available to OSM in such a way that we would
expect it to survive a hypothetical license change.
I'm confused.
If a maintainer of a database wishes to change
On 29.11.22 03:57 Minh Nguyen wrote:
Could you clarify the "perhaps" here? If something has been explicitly
dedicated to the public domain via CC0, a similar statement, or a
relevant law, should it not survive any relicensing attempt? Or is this
just about the editorial decision of whether to
Am 29.11.2022 um 15:30 schrieb Greg Troxel:
...
Also, what we need is a copyright license, so that's not necessarily --
and hopefully isn't -- a contract.
Well there is this kind of underlying assumption that for most material
in question, with the exception of actual maps, there is no
john whelan writes:
> I have concerns about the amount of effort we seem to be asking open data
> set creators to make. I think it took me seven years to get the licensing
> correct to be able to import the local bus stops and very early in the
> process the head of the transit system said
Simon Poole writes:
>> Could you clarify the "perhaps" here? If something has been
>> explicitly dedicated to the public domain via CC0, a similar
>> statement, or a relevant law, should it not survive any relicensing
>> attempt? Or is this just about the editorial decision of whether to
>>
8 matches
Mail list logo
