Could admin transfer this to Talk-GB please.
DaveF
On 27/03/2023 13:51, Ragone, Olivia via talk wrote:
Thank you for providing feedback on some of the edits made by National
Trust staff as part of our organised editing activity, on the
representation of paths. We’d like to apologise that it
I don't totally disagree with Greg's characterization of "unreasonable," as
"standardized / hashtagged" changeset comments are curt (even a touch rude) if
they are not super-well-documented (widely vetted, spoken about...) as to
what's going on, and easily have the ability to hide errors or
I suspect the National Trust of which I happen to be a member is much more
centralised and top down than OpenStreetMap which tends to be more bottom
up. It is a different culture and the OSM side has evolved over time.
I'd ask you to be nice to us and work with us where possible. The OSM
"Ragone, Olivia via talk" writes:
> We tend to use a standard changeset comment as it would be very
> difficult to capture details of every change. However, since receiving
> feedback on the Talk-GB mailing list, we have amended our standard
> comment to be more representative of the type of
Thank you for providing feedback on some of the edits made by National Trust
staff as part of our organised editing activity, on the representation of
paths. We'd like to apologise that it has taken some time to provide a
response. We are always open to constructive feedback that helps us to
5 matches
Mail list logo
