Re: [OSM-talk] Unrepentant Vandal

2015-11-08 Thread Andrew Errington
Thanks everyone. I'll double-check the resurrected railway line and keep an eye on it. I am not impressed by that mapper's work, and I expect more problems in the future. The other problems I have seen are, in many cases, caused by misguided QA tools. I have had one guy remove all

Re: [OSM-talk] Unrepentant Vandal

2015-11-07 Thread Jo
Hi Andrew, I used Potlatch 1 to retrieve your work. (edit with Potlatch, then remove the 2 from the url) Then advanced/undelete select the way and unlock. Don't forget to save. It would indeed be better to map the road as a dual carriageway as well. Polyglot 2015-11-07 11:36 GMT+01:00 Andrew

Re: [OSM-talk] Unrepentant Vandal

2015-11-07 Thread Andy Townsend
On 07/11/2015 10:36, Andrew Errington wrote: Hi all, Here is a link to a random point on a light rail system: http://osm.org/go/546Jvddtd--?m= Soon after it opened I travelled on it from end to end, collecting gps data and photos of all the station signs. There are two railway lines, one in

[OSM-talk] Unrepentant Vandal

2015-11-07 Thread Andrew Errington
Hi all, Here is a link to a random point on a light rail system: http://osm.org/go/546Jvddtd--?m= Soon after it opened I travelled on it from end to end, collecting gps data and photos of all the station signs. There are two railway lines, one in each direction, and I mapped them both

Re: [OSM-talk] Unrepentant Vandal

2015-11-07 Thread Richard Mann
tracks=2, and the tags on the highway way was originally preferred if the tracks were consistently in the middle of the street To me, that single line veers implausibly from one side of the street to the other, and I'd probably be more concerned to get the highway and the tram tracks to line up