Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread stevea
There is a lot going on in this topic: primarily, a fairly large, potentially unknowably large semantic of meanings the author of a fixme tag meant when created. Let's be careful as we interpret these. Assumptions by the recipient of that tag should be cautious, lest they wrongly predict the

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread John Whelan
But then you're often talking about a HOT mapper who might not have done any mapping for three years. I must confess when validating HOT projects if I saw a mapper had done something glaringly wrong and it was more than a week before noting the response rate to a changeset message was less

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Mateusz Konieczny via talk
Mar 12, 2020, 23:54 by dieterdre...@gmail.com: > > > sent from a phone > >> On 12. Mar 2020, at 17:42, Marc M. wrote: >> >> we may delete all fixme=name for all object without a name tag >> > > > I agree that fixme=name for missing names is pointless and could be removed > (although Andy has

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 12. Mar 2020, at 17:42, Marc M. wrote: > > we may delete all fixme=name for all object without a name tag I agree that fixme=name for missing names is pointless and could be removed (although Andy has a point about not knowing someone’s workflow, so for safety you

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Pierre Béland via talk
Mar.12 2020 12 h 16 UTC−4, Volker Schmidt wrote : > It may have been a user who wanted to draw attention to the fact that she has > inserted a place>  without knowing the name.  For the Mali example given by John, an Overpass query reports some 1,200 such points north of Mali, the majority

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Marc M.
Hello, Volker Schmidt wrote > draw attention to the fact that she > has inserted a place without knowing the name not setting a name=* tag do the same, without telling other that your personal wish must be done. otherwise another contributor will add fix=lit when he doesn't know if the street is

[OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Volker Schmidt
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:09:09 -0400 > From: john whelan > To: OpenStreetMap talk mailing list > Subject: [OSM-talk] fixme=name > Message-ID: > nr_vr93qs7pna4z...@mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I'm seeing a fair

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread john whelan
I'm looking in Mali, looking at the history of a sample I'd say they were HOT mapped and many are more than four years old. Cheerio John On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 09:29, Andy Townsend wrote: > On 12/03/2020 13:09, john whelan wrote: > > I'm seeing a fair number of settlements with this fixme

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread joost schouppe
John, I created a bunch of those a few years back, when I was still young(er) and (more) naive. Someone had gone and mapped a bunch of villages with the equivalent of name=village. Instead of just removing the name, I also added a fixme to highlight the issue. Someone did point out after the fact

Re: [OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread Andy Townsend
On 12/03/2020 13:09, john whelan wrote: I'm seeing a fair number of settlements with this fixme tagged on them and I'm not sure what the logic is. There are 39k "fixme=name" worldwide.  I suspect usage varies greatly worldwide; it would be useful to know which ones you're looking at. The

[OSM-talk] fixme=name

2020-03-12 Thread john whelan
I'm seeing a fair number of settlements with this fixme tagged on them and I'm not sure what the logic is. I would have thought it is fairly simple to search for place=village without a name tag or am I missing something? Thanks John ___ talk mailing