2015-05-16 17:41 GMT+02:00 Markus Straub :
> another late reply :)
>
Just in time for me. :)
I am in general not sure if it's a good idea to use oneway:bicycle to
> infer information regarding cycleway:*, since there could be
> cycleway:left and cycleway:right - should it apply to one of them? or
Hi,
another late reply :)
You are right, the tagging is a bit unclear when reading through the
examples on the Wiki page. Until now I was not aware of this
additional "usage" of oneway:bicycle. For me this was just a way to
clearly state that the road is, in one way or another, usable in both
dire
Hi,
2015-05-03 21:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Straub :
> It's complicated, but I hope this helps a bit.
>
Thanks, it's definitely helped me. I figured out a new marking for unpaved
cyclepaths.
Now I have ran into a problem with the following way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/8080548
Based on the w
(I subscribed to the list temporary.)
2015-05-10 19:57 GMT+02:00 Pallai Roland :
> Hi,
>
> 2015-05-03 21:10 GMT+02:00 Markus Straub :
>
>> It's complicated, but I hope this helps a bit.
>>
>
> Thanks, it's definitely helped me. I figured out a new marking for unpaved
> cyclepaths.
>
> Now I have
Hi Roland,
yes, there are unpaved cycelways in Austria that have the official
signage for cyclepaths (the one for 'pure' cycleways and also those for
combined foot and cyclepaths:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:segregated). I know some examples
of mostly touristic paths along rivers,
Hi,
I'm working on a new, detailed web map for cyclists, the coverage has been
extended to Austria yesterday and I have found something that's unusual in
Hungary (where I started): unpaved cycleways. See:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/98p
Can you tell me are those official cycleways marked with a tr
