John Smith wrote:
On 23 May 2010 21:50, John Smith wrote:
interested, I don't have any designs in mind, or any other planning.
Thanks to Sam for pointing out this page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tshirt_competition
Also Harvey Norman via fujifilmimagine.com
On 25 May 2010 19:39, Richard Colless wrote:
> You can also buy a special "Iron-On Transfer" paper at specialist paper
> supply shops, and print your own design, using any standard inkjet printer.
> Works really well, as long as you remember to mirror-reverse any text. Works
> out at a couple of d
Are you able to explain how to check easily with JOSM if part of the
coastline is missing?
With reading about all the rendering problems with coastline not being a
continuous polygon a relation seemed the best way.
2 other reasons for a coastline relation.
1) I was also planning to use the rel
On 25 May 2010 20:01, Markus wrote:
> Are you able to explain how to check easily with JOSM if part of the
> coastline is missing?
JOSM often complains too much about missing or lacking coastlines...
> With reading about all the rendering problems with coastline not being a
> continuous polygon
-Original Message-
From: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 25 May 2010 7:38 PM
To: Markus
Cc: OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Australian Coastline
> Are you able to explain how to check easily with JOSM if part of the
> coastline is missing?
>
John Smith wrote:
On 25 May 2010 19:39, Richard Colless wrote:
You can also buy a special "Iron-On Transfer" paper at specialist paper
supply shops, and print your own design, using any standard inkjet printer.
Works really well, as long as you remember to mirror-reverse any tex
On 25 May 2010 20:28, Markus wrote:
> You still haven't explained how to check the whole coastline is joined with
> JOSM. You mensioned JOSM has a validation checker that should be used for
> this kind of thing.
Click to display the validation plugin panel or press Alt+Shift+V then
click on the v
I received this follow-up email to a query about some strange tagging.
I thought it was worth throwing out there to get the lists opinion on
the appropriate way to tag this road. In summary, it is 21km long and
is one-way for 10.5hrs, dual-way for 1.5hr, then one-way in the opposite
direction for
On 26 May 2010 03:07, David Murn wrote:
> I received this follow-up email to a query about some strange tagging.
> I thought it was worth throwing out there to get the lists opinion on
> the appropriate way to tag this road. In summary, it is 21km long and
> is one-way for 10.5hrs, dual-way for 1
On 26 May 2010 08:09, John Smith wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 03:07, David Murn wrote:
>> I received this follow-up email to a query about some strange tagging.
>> I thought it was worth throwing out there to get the lists opinion on
>> the appropriate way to tag this road. In summary, it is 21km lon
Should these keys be "attribution" instead of "attributation"?
Alex.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
On 26 May 2010 10:23, Alex Lum wrote:
>
> />
>
> Should these keys be "attribution" instead of "attributation"?
Ross spotted that last week and they should since fixed it, unless I
missed some?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http:
David wrote:
> In summary, it is 21km long and is one-way for 10.5hrs, dual-way
> for
1.5hr, then one-way in the opposite direction for 10.5hrs and
> dual-way again for 1.5hr. Then just for fun, on weekends, the
> day/night pattern is reversed.
David, as a local resident I can tell you the South
On 26 May 2010 10:29, Simon Biber wrote:
> oneway:forward=Mon-Fri 02:00-12:30; Sat-Sun+Hol 14:00-00:30
> oneway:reverse=Mon-Fri 14:00-00:30; Sat-Sun+Hol 02:00-12:30
> access:no=12:30-14:00; 00:30-02:00
Instead of Hol, PH was defined on opening_hours:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:openin
On Wed, 26 May 2010 10:28:24 +1000
John Smith wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 10:23, Alex Lum wrote:
> >
> > > v='http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_9150' />
> >
> > Should these keys be "attribution" instead of "attributation"?
>
> Ross spotted that last week and they should since fixed it, u
On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 17:29 -0700, Simon Biber wrote:
> David wrote:
> > In summary, it is 21km long and is one-way for 10.5hrs, dual-way
> > for 1.5hr, then one-way in the opposite direction for 10.5hrs and
> > dual-way again for 1.5hr. Then just for fun, on weekends, the
> > day/night pattern is
On 26 May 2010 10:37, John Smith wrote:
> oneway:forward=Mo-Fr 02:00-12:30; Sa-Su,PH 14:00-00:30
> oneway:reverse=Mo-Fr 14:00-00:30; Sa-Su,PH 02:00-12:30
> access:no=12:30-14:00; 00:30-02:00
Something occurred to me earlier, what happens during the 2 change
over events where the direction of traf
A quick check on wikipedia found this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Southern_Expressway#Operation
Apparently it stays open during fri/sat and sun/mon when the direction
doesnt change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reversible_lane#Examples also shows that
its not a unique situation, maybe its wort
On 26 May 2010 15:38, David Murn wrote:
> Apparently it stays open during fri/sat and sun/mon when the direction
> doesnt change.
Ok to cover that and prevent confusion with day changes you might do this:
oneway=tidal
oneway:forward=Mo 00:30-02:00; Mo-Fr 02:00-12:30; Sa-Su,PH 14:00-00:30
oneway:
19 matches
Mail list logo
