There are already systems written specifically for OSM to do this
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Tasking_Manager
https://github.com/tlpinney/osmtask/
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-
I've looked on the dev list
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/dev/2011-November/date.html and while
programming speak is pretty opaque to me, I can't see any reference to these
cool tools you mentioned. I'll take your word on it though.
Does anyone have any links to any of these tools (
It would be my guess that Australia has the highest non-CT compliant data to
active mapper ratio in the world, even if we ignore the ABS2006 import. I also
reckon it's likely that there's a lot of people in other countries that would
be willing to help out.
I would also guess that most Austral
Ben wrote
"The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default
residential speed limit in Australia) and these edits could be "re-edited"
by an actual bot. Given that these edits are easy to identify, and the
large number of ways, this might be a useful exercise. It would give us a
Hi.
In general I think the maxspeed edits were very useful, in terms of how
they help routing. I wouldn't want to lose them.
AFAIK the edits were not made by a bot login though.
The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default
residential speed limit in Australia) and these e
Richard wrote"Hi Nick,
I see several approaches available here:
- ask the bot owner to accept
- revert the bot work
- ask for help reverting (typically others in the community or DWG)
- argue convincingly on legal talk that the maxspeed bot and bots in
general don't have rights to decline CT/O
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Nick Hocking wrote:
> Richard,
>
> I don't believe that it is possible to start remapping in Australia until
> the maxspeed bots are removed (from the database and also all histories)
> without affecting any other edits to those ways.
> Or alternatively reassigning
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:09 PM, El Segundo Can't win
wrote:
> Late to the conversation but..
>
> First up, from people have said, what cc-cleaner is doing is shocking
> vandalism, whether they intend it or not.
I'm disappointed by deletions without remapping. One way to defeat
that is by rem
Richard,
I don't believe that it is possible to start remapping in Australia until
the maxspeed bots are removed (from the database and also all histories)
without affecting any other edits to those ways.
Or alternatively reassigning them to a ct_acceptor userid. (also for all
histories)
Then (an
Late to the conversation but..
First up, from people have said, what cc-cleaner is doing is shocking
vandalism, whether they intend it or not.
In a worst case scenario, all non-CT compliant information will be expunged on
1st April. There is no need to delete it (especially manually) befo
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Andrew Laughton
wrote:
> On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
>>
>>> Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
>>> to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
>>>
>>> So removin
On 2 December 2011 07:20, John Henderson wrote:
> On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
>
> Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
>> to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
>>
>> So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
>> to tho
On 02/12/11 09:00, Richard Weait wrote:
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and running a script.
So removing data from decliners and remapping it, and reaching out
to those who haven't yet responded is valid and valuable.
Thanks for
Who or whatever cc_cleaner is, it seems like it might have issues.
It has deleted at least one way that should have been safe. Unless i'm
misreading the history somehow.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/41754970/history
That was was created by Chadzopkyo who has accepted the odbl accordin
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:48 PM, Mark Pulley wrote:
> Has a date been set for the removal of CC-BY-SA-only data yet?
Before 01 April 2012
http://blog.osmfoundation.org/2011/11/16/odbl-progress/
Deleting tainted data and remapping by local mappers is far superior
to waiting until March 31 and run
I've been thinking for a while about the best way to remove CC-BY-SA-only data
when the time comes. As already noted, some people have started already by
deleting large areas of data and re-adding from bing (losing all the tags) -
which at best may be unnecessary, and at present (as no date has
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 3:46 PM, John Henderson wrote:
> On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote:
>
>> I often watch OSM edits using
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer and noticed the
>> deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected DrLizAU was
>> removing her own contributi
On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote:
I often watch OSM edits using
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer and noticed the
deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected DrLizAU was
removing her own contributions, but cannot back this up.
DrLizAU's ethical standards are very
On 02/12/11 01:11, Grant Slater wrote:
I have nothing to do with the cc_cleaner user's deletes/edits. I often
watch OSM edits using http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/LiveMapViewer
and noticed the deletes of mostly DrLizAU's contributions. I suspected
DrLizAU was removing her own contributions,
On 1 December 2011 13:48, John Henderson wrote:
> On 01/12/11 22:34, Mark Pulley wrote:
>
>> User "cc-cleaner"? I've had a quick look at some of the changesets, and
>> they all seem to be just deleting things. I have a suspicion that the
>> things being deleted are by users who haven't agreed to t
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:48 AM, John Henderson wrote:
> I saw the same relationship with Firefishy (from South Africa) and went to
> bed puzzling about the coincidence. Firefishy was adding in a little data
> within minutes of cc-cleaner's massive deletes.
>
> I woke up a couple of minutes ago r
On 01/12/11 22:34, Mark Pulley wrote:
User "cc-cleaner"? I've had a quick look at some of the changesets, and
they all seem to be just deleting things. I have a suspicion that the
things being deleted are by users who haven't agreed to the new license,
but I didn't think we were up to this stage
On 01/12/2011, at 6:15 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:58 PM, John Henderson wrote:
>> Lake Cargelligo township shows mapped streets at this zoom level:
>>
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.3081&lon=146.3792&zoom=12&layers=M
>>
>> but disappears as you zoom in from th
On 01/12/11 19:15, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Deleted by user: cc_cleaner in changeset
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/9915617
I found this by looking at this area in the owl viewer:
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/owl_viewer/map
Thanks Andrew. I wasn't aware of that facility. It
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 4:58 PM, John Henderson wrote:
> Lake Cargelligo township shows mapped streets at this zoom level:
>
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.3081&lon=146.3792&zoom=12&layers=M
>
> but disappears as you zoom in from there. The detail is also missing in
> JOSM. I presume it
25 matches
Mail list logo
