Ben wrote "The content of these edits is in the public domain (I.e. the default residential speed limit in Australia) and these edits could be "re-edited" by an actual bot. Given that these edits are easy to identify, and the large number of ways, this might be a useful exercise. It would give us a clearer in terms of knowing which ways are really in need of re-mapping. "
Hi Ben, I agree completely. However we can't just re-edit the bots work since it would still leave a ct_decliner userid in the history chain. Therefore I think that DWG (only they have the access), should just alter the changesets of the bots and any histories kept to other new userids that are marked as anonymoue ct acceptors. Then we can see what needs remapping and if further down the track we need to remove the bots work, well it can still be doneat that time. Nick
_______________________________________________ Talk-au mailing list Talk-au@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au