Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
--
A day for firm decisions! Or is it?
That got quite a chuckle going here love it !! :D
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
John Smith wrote:
What is, if anything, used for place markers or other types of non-address
specific markers?
I'm not sure that I understand?
You're probably aware that the 'place' key is used for countries,
states, cities, towns, villages, suburbs etc
John Smith wrote:
Yes, there seems to be a couple of cultural/language/country differences I'm haggling over in the bug list that may need some extra input from others, such as naming junction=roundabouts.
http://josm.openstreetmap.de/ticket/2792
I suspect this issue is going to be
John Smith wrote:
submitted a bug about all the false positives
about the "Presets do not contain property key" validation errors
The validator informational (Other) warning says: "Presets
do not contain property key"
This led me to
John Smith wrote:
It looks like the validator plugin uses the presets to match against, however
I'm starting to agree that these shouldn't be presets but they shouldn't be
showing up as errors either.
I'll see if I can hack something together as a general ignore list, even if
they
John Smith wrote:
... I have a new version uploaded that ignores a lot of the ABS tags, there is still some missing preset tags but that's a job for someone else really.
http://sharebee.com/856f6789
Good job John, that version of the validator.jar clears all of the ABS
key/preset
John Smith wrote:
Rick: Karlsruhe Schema format of "addr:postcode".
John: What is the right thing to do here?
Also why did the bulk import vary from what everyone else is doing?
The 'addr:postcode' key is in the presets because it's the recommended
way of entering a
John Smith wrote:
Forgot to ask, is there any more situations that isn't validly shown up as a
warning/error but should be, or errors that shouldn't be that are shown up?
The ABS boundary data import throws up a LOT of warnings and information
notes in JOSM validator. Some might simply ignore
John Smith wrote:
.using the validator plugin
Hi John,
I originally loaded the Validator plugin using the JOSM interface and
then I enabled it in the plugins menu.
I use it to check all of the data I download, usually before I start
editing and then again before I upload my work.
opps, forgot to attach image links:
1.
http://s756.photobucket.com/albums/xx204/AusRick/?action="">
2.
http://s756.photobucket.com/albums/xx204/AusRick/?action="">
3.
http://s756.photobucket.com/albums/xx204/AusRick/?action="">
Rick Peterson wrote:
John Smith wrote:
Gympie has lots of unnamed ways, a number
added by me and I'm just trying to easily locate and name them.
Indeed I get 288 unnamed way errors when I do a generous area
download around Gympie QLD. (Including unnamed roundabouts which I've
written about before as a
John Smith wrote:
all I need to figure out is how to ignore all unnamed ways where
junction=roundabout :)
I hope you will share such valuable information should you happen upon a
method! .. those roundabout false-positives drive me nuts !!
That aside, I find the JOSM Validator
Thanks everyone for your input regarding roundabouts and under what
circumstances to tag them with a name=*
Whilst some opinions differ, I'd suggest that the majority of people who
have responded to my post name roundabout junctions only when the
roundabout has an official name (not the name
Hi Folks,
Quick question about roundabouts. (junction=roundabout)
Originally, I didn't name roundabout junctions, but when I validate my
work in JOSM, it identifies them as 'Unnamed Ways' in the warnings section.
I've tried naming a few using the name of the primary road that connects
with
Hello again talk-au,
I'm new to editing in the OSM project and before I start making
significant changes to another's work, I thought I should check with
people more experienced with the project to make sure I'm correct.
Background:
I was having a look at my local area with Keepright and
Delta Foxtrot wrote:
Because they aren't joined,
Hi Delta, thanks for the reply.
Because they aren't joined is exactly the reason they should show in
Keepright IMO, although I take your point about false postives with
service roads etc.
>From Keepright:
"almost-junctions
Streets
Hi Folks,
I’m a newcomer to the OSM project with a couple of questions.
BACKGROUND:
I recently traced and added the streets of my village and surrounding
areas to OSM (Bowen Mountain NSW).
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-33.582lon=150.6326zoom=14layers=B000FTF
17 matches
Mail list logo