> Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:32:26 +1100
> From: "Phil Wyatt"
> To: ,
> Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
> Message-ID: <004d01d81ed6$7979f520$6c6ddf60$@wyatt-family.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii&quo
, 11 February 2022 12:16 AM
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
To: mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >
Subje
System (AWTGS)
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
To: mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
Message-ID: <007601d81e0c$7f095af0$7d1c10d0$
Message: 2
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:26:38 +1100
From: "Phil Wyatt" mailto:p...@wyatt-family.com> >
To: mailto:talk-au@openstreetmap.org> >
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
Message-ID: <007601d81e0c$7f095af0$7d1c10d0$@wyatt-family
Hi Folks,
Thanks for the great discussion on this issue. I have tried to summarise the
discussion and it seems like there is some consensus around the following
tagging
hiking_scale:awtgs= as the general tag for the grade of the WHOLE track as that
is what is detailed in the AWTGS
On 9/2/22 16:19, Ian Steer wrote:
>> I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale ..
>> even if you don't know what awtgs is.
>>
>Fair comment.
>
>> Routes are a different problem while the worst one could be
>> included .. what happens if/when things change?
The source tag should directly name the exact tag for which it specifies the
source, so it should be:
source:hiking_scale:awtgs=
From: Ian Steer
Sent: Wednesday, 9 February 2022 15:19
To: talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS
>> I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale ..
>> even if you don't know what awtgs is.
>>
>Fair comment.
>
>> Routes are a different problem while the worst one could be
>> included .. what happens if/when things change? Possibly better to leave
it off?
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 16:35, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I prefer hiking_scale:awtgs= as you know that it is a hiking scale .. even
> if you don't know what awtgs is.
>
Fair comment.
> Routes are a different problem while the worst one could be included
> .. what happens
On 8/2/22 12:29, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say
just pick one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how
it's used.
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
I prefer
To: Andrew Harvey
Cc: Ian Steer ; OSM Australian Talk List
Subject: Re: [talk-au] Aust. Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey mailto:andrew.harv...@gmail.com> > wrote:
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pi
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 09:50, Andrew Harvey wrote:
> I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick
> one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.
>
Personally, I like awtgs=*.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
>
I think either awtgs= or hiking_scale:awtgs= are fine, I'd say just pick
one and start a wiki page describing the tag and how it's used.
As I raised before I'm still not sure about how it would apply to
individual ways vs route relations and if it's only tagged based on
officially assigned values
G'day all,
I'm trying to recall where we got to (if anywhere) on a consensus of how to
tag walking tracks with the Australian Walking Track Grading System (AWTGS)
scale??
I originally tagged then with awtgs=x. A well meaning guy in Germany then
deleted them thinking someone had made a
14 matches
Mail list logo
