Re: [Talk-us] admin_level and COGs, MPOs, SPDs, Home Rule

On May 12, 2020, at 8:43 PM, wrote: > Butting in for my *long* two cents: I appreciate you doing so. > Please correct me if I'm wrong in characterizing boundary=administrative like > this; I'm still not sure that I've nailed it down. I'd say (and for the many-th time, I'm not a political

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level and COGs, MPOs, SPDs, Home Rule

Butting in for my *long* two cents: I've lived in Rhode Island all of my life, until I moved to Boston for college. When I was younger and dumber (read: fifteen), I discovered the admin_level tag and thought, "Hey, why isn't my county admin_level=6? It says on this list that US counties are

Re: [Talk-br] Digest Talk-br, volume 140, assunto 11

r.com/OpenStreetMapBR/status/1256189877055639552?s=20 > > > > Queria saber antecipadamente o que será mapeado, e de que forma poderia > > colaborar, se fecha com minhas disponibilidades e interesses. > > Procurei mais informações mas não encontrei. > > Nem no talk-br. > > Só fornecem se se cadas

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Robert Keller, Laurent Matheron et Pierre Guillou : Hitler sur table d'écoute

Bonjour Yves Il y a aussi un central téléphonique qui porte le nom de Robert Keller, correspondant au bureau de poste dans le 15eme arrondissement Parisien https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2062421762#map=19/48.84801/2.28139 (Il manque ref ptt dessus 75115RKE) Est ce qu'on sait où se trouve la

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

You are right to point out that OSM offers a different choice of options compared with the NSW LPI BaseMap. Some time ago, when I couldn't find a legend on the BaseMap, I contacted NSW Spatial Services and I was directed to

Re: [Talk-it] Village / Town

Fintocubano wrote > In UK ci sono esempi di citta' turistiche e storiche ('market towns') che > ho > visitato, come Civitella del Tronto, che hanno < 10.000 abitanti e che > sono > taggate come ''town'', aventi negozi e servizi non del tutto usati da > gente > dei centri vicini ma piu' dai turisti

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Evolution des règles pour les plages et la ligne de côte

Bonsoir, Super boulot Djo man ! :) Quelques remarques et ajouts : Plages Je pense que les polygones natural=beach devraient couvrir l'intégralité des places, à savoir au-dessus et en-dessous du trait de côte. Il y a des difficultés techniques à rendre ça correctement dans openstreetmap-carto

Re: [Talk-br] Lista de Cidades e Municípios Brasileiros que atualmente estão cobertos na solução openstreetmap.

Boa noite. Em 2016 um esforço da comunidade que identificou as últimas 420 cidades brasileiras que não tinham nenhum dado no OpenStreetMap. Desde então, todas as sedes municipais tem, pelo menos, a geometria das vias desenhadas. Em alguns casos, no entanto, lugares podem estar desatualizados por

[talk-latam] Guatemala has no national border anymore?

Hello, According to the wiki all national borders should have tag boundary=administration (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:boundary=administrative#National ) but it seem to have disappeared for Guatemala. Is

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level and COGs, MPOs, SPDs, Home Rule

Note that vandalism in OSM and similar project is considered as something that is not only damaging but also malicious and intended to be damaging. In cases where you consider other mapper as mistaken and wrong, but not malicious - consider using other terms. See

Re: [OSM-talk] Let's talk Attribution

May 12, 2020, 05:48 by rockyt...@gmail.com: >> >> > As Joseph said: > >> The attribution goes on the map. >> This is not a difficult requirement to meet. >> > > >> The most recent version of the guidelines >> drafted by the LWG is almost there, but has drawn community criticism >> about being

[Talk-br] Lista de Cidades e Municípios Brasileiros que atualmente estão cobertos na solução openstreetmap.

Prezados, Boa tarde. Tudo bom? Primeiramente, obrigado por conceder acesso a comunidade Open Street Map. Porém, eu estou fazendo um estudo para a empresa em que eu trabalho que é substituir uma solução de mercado pela OpenStreetMap. Por favor, poderiam fornecer a relação atualizada de Cidades

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

May 12, 2020, 14:06 by frede...@remote.org: > Colin, > > you're lumping in a few different things together I think. > > The scarce resource in this project are still mappers, not consumers. > The mappers certainly want to make a good and usable map; but if you are > faced with a choice of

[Talk-de] Berlin-Brandenburg Stammtisch

Hallo, am 14.05.2020 19:00 also diesen Donnerstag findet wieder unser monatlicher gemeinsamer OpenStreetMap und FOSSGIS-Stammtisch Berlin/Brandenburg statt. Aufgrund der aktuellen Situation wieder Online. Auch wenn es letztes mal gut mit Jitsi funktioniert hat werden wir dieses mal die vom

[Talk-africa] [Trufi Association] Translation of bus route mapping documentation

Hello there, I am Sören Reinecke from Trufi Association. We help communities in developing countries to organize their public transport (pt) e.g. we work with the community from Accra, Ghana. Aside from providing the pt navigation app and the infrastructure behind it (e.g. OTP server etc.) we

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

Schvalne jsem se na tu osmicku poptal a prevod visi na vyporadani pozemku pod silnici. Po nem kraj kyvne na prevod. Do te doby to zustane silnici I/8 (navzdory cedulim) a to je realita. J. __ > Od: "Jan Macura" > Komu: "OpenStreetMap

Re: [Talk-br] Mapatona "Mapeando Rio Branco com o OpenStreetMap"

Olá, Sérgio. Muito obrigada pela dica. Iremos anexar o tutorial à Wiki. At.te, Lívia - *Dr. Lívia Castro Degrossi* Postdoctoral researcher | National Centre for Disaster Monitoring and Early-Warning (Cemaden) On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:37 AM Sérgio V.

[OSM-talk-ie] OpenStreetMap Ireland Microgrant Application

Hi, How do we do the "*Community members are encouraged to endorse your project request here!*" bit? Colm --- Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

Given that, at this time, we are thousands... Le 12 mai 2020 15:50:17 GMT+02:00, "Sören Reinecke via talk" a écrit : >___ >talk mailing list >talk@openstreetmap.org >https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

[OSM-talk-fr] Assemblée Générale samedi 13 juin

Bonjour, Très Chère·er·s contributeurs OpenStreetMap l'Assemblée générale annuelle de l'association OpenStreetMap France aura lieu le 13 juin 2020 (15h, horaire à confirmer). Association à laquelle vous pouvez apporter votre soutien de beaucoup de façons, dont l'une est de voter à son

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

I wish to add some nuance to Frederik's opinion: On 12/05/2020 07:06, Frederik Ramm wrote: The scarce resource in this project are still mappers, not consumers. as far as my experience goes, in most places where I've been the scarce resource is people on the spot: __local__ mappers with

Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 164, Issue 16

What a useful insight into a parentless system. Tony On 12/05/2020 18:02, Philip Barnes wrote: On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:35 +0100, SK53 wrote: Its quite possible that this just cannot be done. I believe Leicestershire, and consequently Rutland as well, does not use any reference to tehe

Re: [Talk-GB] Talk-GB Digest, Vol 164, Issue 16

On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 21:35 +0100, SK53 wrote: > Its quite possible that this just cannot be done. I believe > Leicestershire, and consequently Rutland as well, does not use any > reference to tehe parish in the identifiers used in official > documents. Instead all paths consist if a letter

Re: [talk-cz] otevrena silnice u Stribra

Projekt ? :(    Protože namapuje jen D5, ale i stavbu D3... __ Od: "Jan Macura" Komu: "OpenStreetMap Czech Republic" Datum: 12.05.2020 13:50 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] otevrena silnice u Stribra Co? To už jsem tam tak dlouho nejel? :-OV

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

On 2020-05-12 15:28, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > On 5/12/20 2:52 PM, Colin Smale wrote: > >> As you and many others frequently remind us: OSM is first and foremost about >> the data and not any specific use-case or rendering thereof. > Yes - but a data model is not a neutral representation of

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

Thanks for this. Shall we get all on one table; mappers, data analysts, data consumers, developers of and around OSM. This is what I longer proposed in some way. Can this dream now become true?CheerioSören Reinecke alias Valor NaramCloser to the daily preoccupations of Openstreetmap, even lists of

Re: [Talk-br] Mapatona "Mapeando Rio Branco com o OpenStreetMap"

Bom dia Lívia, achei que ficou muito bacana o tutorial e bem completo. Se vocês desejarem podem também fazer upload do PDF à wiki e colar na página do projeto. Boa mapatona! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Sérgio - http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/smaprs De:

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

On 5/12/20 2:52 PM, Colin Smale wrote: As you and many others frequently remind us: OSM is first and foremost about the data and not any specific use-case or rendering thereof. Yes - but a data model is not a neutral representation of reality: it is a projection through a use-case, mapping

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] manque la maj de coastline sur le rendu osm-fr

Bonjour, résumé de la saga : - le style fr et le style br/ca/... ne mettaient pas à jour le fichier dérivé des lignes de côte depuis... heu.. longtemps :) maj effectuée (l'actuel date de janvier 2020) et les tuiles régénérées - un 2ieme soucis fait que le cache frontal ne récupère pas les tuiles

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Evolution des règles pour les plages et la ligne de côte

Si on lit attentivement les définitions de MHWS, il faut calculer la moyenne des marées successives de plus haute amplitude au moment des nouvelles et pleines lunes soit 4 marées en gérnéral par mois et non pas pour toutes les marées de vives eaux (coefficent supérieur à 70). Etant donné les

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Er is nog een 'truuk' om verwijderde ways terug te halen. (werkt enkel voor ways). Start editeersessie met Potlatch2. Je wilt eigenlijk de vorige versie van Potlatch gebruiken, haal daarom de 2 weg uit de url in de adresbalk... De originele versie van Potlatch maakt gebruik van een niet

Re: [Talk-us] admin_level and COGs, MPOs, SPDs, Home Rule

On May 11, 2020, at8:28:48 PM PDT, Martin Machyna wrote: > I am just going to paste here what I wrote on Slack and I as well consider > removal of counties from admin_level=6 as vandalism. It is not vandalism, it is an established, consensus-driven, years-old tagging principle, fully

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

On 2020-05-12 14:06, Frederik Ramm wrote: > Colin, > > you're lumping in a few different things together I think. > > The scarce resource in this project are still mappers, not consumers. > The mappers certainly want to make a good and usable map; but if you are > faced with a choice of either

Re: [talk-cz] otevrena silnice u Stribra

:-) út 12. 5. 2020 v 12:52 odesílatel Petr Vozdecký napsal: > Ahoj, > dnes otevreli kus nove silnice u Stribra (docela sledovana prelozka II/230 > spojujici Stribro s D5): > > https://zdopravy.cz/plzensky-kraj-otevrel-novou-silnici-zjednodusi-cestu-na-d5-ze-stribra-48683/ > > Jen rychly

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

Thanks Michael. Sorry, my last email overlapped with yours. I think a major problem is that the way the LPI Basemap, and folks in Australia generally, use the terms forest, swamp and wetland differs slightly from the way they are described in the OSM wiki pages. For example, the OSM guidelines

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

Colin, you're lumping in a few different things together I think. The scarce resource in this project are still mappers, not consumers. The mappers certainly want to make a good and usable map; but if you are faced with a choice of either making mapping more difficult or making using more

[talk-au] Barmah thanks

Thanks everyone, it’s been useful to hear the wide range of thoughts. I guess I was uncertain to what degree the Aus OSM group followed the strict definitions of the OSM categories or adapted them to suit the way the terms are used locally. The way the OSM wiki page describes a swamp is very

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

One further consideration is that NSW LPI BaseMap shows most of the NSW side of this area as wetland, subject to periodic inundation, while only small areas are shown as swamp. At the moment, OSM shows most of it as swamp while the named swamps are shown as wetland - exactly the opposite of

Re: [talk-cz] otevrena silnice u Stribra

Co? To už jsem tam tak dlouho nejel? :-O V datech je to od rána a když se dívám na render OSM Carto, tak to už i vidím. Spíš by mě zajímalo, jakým způsobem @vojtechzaboril zmapoval ty stromky kolem té silnice... [image: obrazek.png] H. ___ talk-cz

Re: [Talk-GB] Solar panels 150k up

Of approximately 300 ground-mounted solar farms (field(s) full of solar panels generating >=1MW) in the UK we have around 12 remaining to locatewhich, quite frankly, is astounding. I am getting ready to run around my study shouting, "100%, 100%!!!" as soon as I get a few more hours to complete

[OSM-talk] Fwd: [Foundations] [DEADLINE: MAY 15] Apply for FOSS Responders Funding… NOW!

Hi folks, I hope you and yours are safe and resting Maybe for one of your open source projects Heather -- Forwarded message - From: Alyssa Wright Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 at 02:11 Subject: [Foundations] [DEADLINE: MAY 15] Apply for FOSS Responders Funding… NOW! To: FLOSS

[OSM-talk-fr] Fwd: Référencement, cartes uMap

Tu peux créer un ticket sur https://github.com/umap-project/umap et proposer un PR. Jean-Yvon Message transféré Sujet : [OSM-talk-fr] Référencement, cartes uMap Date : Mon, 11 May 2020 16:29:08 + (UTC) De :Pierre Béland Pour : talk-fr Copie à : Pierre

Re: [OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

On 2020-05-12 12:34, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote: > On 5/12/20 11:42 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: > >> I love the fact that we are now 50 messages into discussing, for the second >> time, a change that would be made ostensibly for the benefit of data >> consumers, and yet no one has asked any

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Bijlage bleeft hangen wegens groter dan 80kb, maar hierbij even ter illustratie hoe je ze kan traceren met de 'skyview' laag. Is een soort hoogtemodelweergave op grondniveau, de bomen zie je dus niet.. en het pad wordt zichtbaar. https://framapic.org/r01ExtbzPorU/Z1Zri8oU24QM.jpg (ik had al

Re: [Talk-GB] Solar panels 150k up

On Tue, 2020-05-12 at 11:08 +0100, SK53 wrote: > Just would like to point out that we passed the 150,000 mark of solar > panels mapped in the UK. Dan & Jez are best informed about solar > farms, so the rest of this update is on small domestic rooftop > installations. > > A number of us continue

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

Hey folks, if you're mapping south of the Murray, then perhaps the Vicmap products may be helpful. Vicmap Vegetation - Tree Density dataset could be useful in that DELWP have classified into dense, medium, and sparse tree density polygons and they continue to update the product regularly. More

[talk-cz] otevrena silnice u Stribra

Ahoj, dnes otevreli kus nove silnice u Stribra (docela sledovana prelozka II/230 spojujici Stribro s D5): https://zdopravy.cz/plzensky-kraj-otevrel-novou-silnici-zjednodusi-cestu-na- d5-ze-stribra-48683/ Jen rychly pohled na rendery na osmap.cz a zatim se to nevykresluje:

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Evolution des règles pour les plages et la ligne de côte

Bonjour, Juste un point de détail à corriger dans la page 8 : "La ligne de côte pour OSM doit etre placée sur le «mean high water springs», «pleine Mer Moyenne de vives-eaux» : hauteur moyenne des* hautes mer de marée de printemps*." devrai être remplacée par "La ligne de côte pour OSM doit etre

[OSM-talk] Quality and the Openstreetmap value chain

On 5/12/20 11:42 AM, Richard Fairhurst wrote: I love the fact that we are now 50 messages into discussing, for the second time, a change that would be made ostensibly for the benefit of data consumers, and yet no one has asked any actual data consumers. Yes. Users are the ultimate measure of

[Talk-GB] Solar panels 150k up

Just would like to point out that we passed the 150,000 mark of solar panels mapped in the UK. Dan & Jez are best informed about solar farms, so the rest of this update is on small domestic rooftop installations. A number of us continue to spend time mapping rooftop panels, and, although progress

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Ik vond het eigenaardig dat ik de geschiedenis van de effectieve weg niet terug vond. Daarom wat verder gezocht. Via deze query de geschiedenis van het gebied opgevraagd (query moet even zoeken) http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/TS1 Op deze manier wel de correcte weg gevonden:

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

Hi Ian, Summary: For me wood is physical tree-cover and wetland is the condition of the ground and they are complimentary rather than exclusive. In Sweden, I map both natural=wood and natural=wetland as separate polygons, with a common border or overlap as appropriate. There is is very easy

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] import cadastre d'une petite zone

Bonjour,12 mai 2020 01:57 "Jérôme Amagat" a écrit:> Le mar. 12 mai 2020 à 01:09, Donat ROBAUX a écrit : > >> En revanche, quand tu passes par l'ancienne méthode via >> cadastre.openstreetmap.fr, en selectionnant juste ta petite zone, tu as ton >> bâtiment. C'est ce que j'utilise, ça marche

Re: [talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

I have visited Millewa in NSW and I've seen a little of Barmah but not much. I have a 4WD vehicle but I would not have left the road in either place as I would have become seriously bogged. It was quite wet in both places when I visited (some years apart, not at the same time). I think they

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Ok, dan lijkt me het het “handigste” dat ik een GPX neem en het pad terug teken (want het zit onder de bomen) Die relaties, en GR enz toevoegen/verleggen, zal ik eerst eens moeten bestuderen, want dat heb ik nog nooit gedaan. > Op 12 mei 2020, om 10:53 heeft Sander Deryckere het > volgende

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Hallo, Het hangt er van af hoe lang de wijziging geleden is. Als het vrij recent is (enkele dagen), kan je de geschiedenis van een gebied opvragen (de geschiedenis knop op de hoofdpagina). Maar deze wijziging lijkt langer geleden te zijn, dus valt dit moeilijk te bespeuren. Wat je wel kan is

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

On Tue, 12 May 2020 at 07:09, wrote: > Pak ale nepopisuje realitu, coz si myslim je trochu problem. > Nepopisuje právní realitu, a to je často sakra velký rozdíl. A podle mě to vůbec problém není. H. ___ talk-cz mailing list talk-cz@openstreetmap.org

[talk-au] What do you prefer for Barmah-Millewa: swamp or wood?

Hello everyone, I don’t know if there is any right / wrong answer to this question, hence I’m keen to know your preferences... I’m mapping wetlands and vegetation along the Murray River upstream of Yarrawonga, and am now mapping in Millewa forest. Millewa (in NSW) and Barmah forest (in Vic)

[OSM-talk-be] Weggetje verdwenen, hoe terug ?

Hoi, Ik zie dat er zeer lokaal, een wegje verdwenen is op de kaart. Ik kan dat er zelf terug op gaan zetten, maar dan is de kans groot dat diegene die de edit gedaan heeft het weer wist. Hoe kan ik 1) zien wie de edit deed, of er een comment bij was? 2) rollback doen Het betreft een pad net

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] import cadastre d'une petite zone

Bonjour, Le 12.05.20 à 02:24, Vincent de Château-Thierry a écrit : > la DGFiP a modifié le paramétrage de la fonction d'impression PDF > à laquelle on accédait, pour en effet diviser par 100 la surface > imprimable d'un seul tenant. autant je comprend bien que pour couvrir une commune, cette

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

Kdybych čekal, až se některé budovy objeví v papírech, tak tady ve FM stále nemám zmapovanou Billu, která už je přes 10 let otevřená, ale z nějakého důvodu budova stále není v katastrální mapě. Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: jo...@razdva.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

A nebo to označit oběma čísly. ref=8;608 Marián -- Původní e-mail -- Od: jo...@razdva.cz Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 12. 5. 2020 8:35:53 Předmět: Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary "No jo, to je dilema. Oznacit to v terenu v souladu s realitou s vedomim, ze

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

Za mě označit to, co je v terénu. Když jdu/jedu podle mapy, nezajímá mě, jak je to teoreticky správně, ale to co vidím před sebou.   U nás ten případ byl taky (nová silnice, označená jako dvojka, fakticky ale dvojka šla zatím souběžně tou starou). Naštěstí to ale tady dost rychle dotáhli i

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

No jo, to je dilema. Oznacit to v terenu v souladu s realitou s vedomim, ze to za rok nebude aktualni (I/8) nebo pripravit oznaceni do budoucna (II/608) a riskovat, ze to bude rok (dva, tri, docasne...) v rozporu s realitou? J. __ >

Re: [talk-cz] was:highway=primary

Pravdou ovšem je, že často je realita jiná na papíře (ŘSD vede ještě jako první třídu) a jiná v terénu (značky čísla silnice typu 34H jsem v terénu nikdy neviděl a pochybuju, že by je vůbec dělali) - často jsou už při stavbě osazeny značky s navrhovaným číslem silnice (608) - pokud vůbec nějaké