=shpak_landsat_lakes and erase the selected objects.
Too risky?
Pierre
De : Pierre Béland infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi 15 novembre 2012 12h48
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Usually, in remote areas of the north that I've dealt with, there is often
little else already there than the Landsat lakes. And usually, in a given
tile, there is usually just a handful of lakes.
In pretty much every case I've dealt with so far, I've replaced the Landsat
lakes with Canvec
From: Dan Charrois [mailto:d...@syz.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Usually, in remote areas of the north that I've dealt with, there is
often little else already there than the Landsat lakes. And usually, in
a given tile, there is usually just a handful of lakes
I've just performed my first edits, in our neighbourhood. One thing I
noticed was that some of the buildings are duplicates. I assume this is
part of what you are talking about when you mention internal CanVec
conflicts. In the case of a local public school, I deleted one of the
copies and
From: Tom Taylor [mailto:tom.taylor.s...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
I've just performed my first edits, in our neighbourhood. One thing I
noticed was that some of the buildings are duplicates. I assume this is
part of what you are talking about when you
A really simple answer that gets lost is this:
Did you make the edits to the best of your ability, and your edits add value to
the OSM project?
If so, then it was the right thing to do.
We all bring different levels of ability, and may not do things perfectly
according to the experts, but if
-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Jeudi 15 novembre 2012 11h06
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
A really simple answer that gets lost is this:
Did you make the edits to the best of your ability, and your edits add value
to the OSM project?
If so, then it was the right thing to do
Pierre Lamoureux: Mardi 13 novembre 2012 23h54
Je suis un nouveau participant au projet OSM, par contre je ne suis pas un
débutant en cartographie et je saisis assez bien les termes de la discussion en
cours
En passant, j’ai un peu d’expérience dans l’utilisation de FME pour convertir
On 14-11-2012 19:37, Pierre Béland wrote:
Pierre Lamoureux***:* Mardi 13 novembre 2012 23h54
**
Je suis un nouveau participant au projet OSM, par contre je ne suis
pas un débutant en cartographie et je saisis assez bien les termes de
la discussion en cours
En passant, j’ai un peu
Hi Paul,
It probably won't come to you as a surprise if I would say it is
acceptable, but to a certain degree. A map with no data is not a map. A
map with inconsistent data is still a map, but obviously something is
not right. A map with perfectly consistent data doesn't need to tell the
stegg...@steggink.org
À : talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Envoyé le : Mardi 13 novembre 2012 15h37
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Hi Paul,
It probably won't come to you as a surprise if I would say it is acceptable,
but to a certain degree. A map with no data is not a map. A map
.
Pierre Lamoureux
Quebec, Qc
De : Pierre Béland [mailto:infosbelas-...@yahoo.fr]
Envoyé : 13 novembre 2012 16:22
À : Frank Steggink; talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Frank Steggink november 13 2012 15h37
answering Paul Norman
However, time
I ran into many of the same issues when I started importing Canvec data for
the province of Newfoundland and Labrador. But, in my case, the arguments I
had were with myself.
When I started, most of the province was a blank slate with only the (PGS)
coastline in the OSM database. There
On Monday, November 12, 2012 4:36 PM, Paul Norman penor...@mac.com wrote:
From: Brian Gamberg [bgamb...@nf.sympatico.ca]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2012 11:01 AM
To: Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
The compromise that I arrived
-
From: Dan Charrois [mailto:d...@syz.com]
Sent: November-11-12 02:47
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
Is it the communities view that it is okay to import CanVec without
reconciling the internal differences between the layers?
I believe
I've already said what I have to say about the issue at hand in
earlier discussion. A more lighthearted remark: whenever I feel
depressed about some Canvec-related issue I load up JOSM, pick a
random location in the US, and spend half an hour fixing TIGER data.
It's a very effective therapeutic...
, and the
community will be down one mapper.
B
-Original Message-
From: Paul Norman [mailto:penor...@mac.com]
Sent: November-10-12 4:38 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
CanVec data comes from multiple sources and this can lead to internal
: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
From: Bryan Crosby [mailto:azubr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 8:33 AM
To: talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Internal CanVec conflicts
This will be my first and only response to this. If the Canadian OSM
community
Is it the communities view that it is okay to import CanVec without
reconciling the internal differences between the layers?
I believe it is. The great thing about OSM data is it is not written in
stone. An import or edit can be changed in the future. The data is
inserted for use by
19 matches
Mail list logo
