Re: [Talk-ca] Route relations

2015-07-16 Thread Martijn van Exel
(sorry wrong from: address again..) In the US, we use a hierarchy of network classifications instead. For instance, Interstate 80 would be network=US:I, ref=80, role=east/west depending on if it’s an eastbound / westbound carriageway. This is a really neat and tidy way of organizing route re

Re: [Talk-ca] Route relations

2015-07-16 Thread Andrew MacKinnon
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 12:47 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote: > Hi all, > > (resending from the correct email address, apologies) > > Thanks for all the responses to my previous thread. I am partly still > processing the input but another topic came up while we were investigating > route relations. I

[Talk-ca] Route relations

2015-07-16 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi all, (resending from the correct email address, apologies) Thanks for all the responses to my previous thread. I am partly still processing the input but another topic came up while we were investigating route relations. I can’t seem to find a wiki page on route relations in Canada, or ev