Sounds good to me. At least we have raised the issue and discussed it.
Cheerio John
James wrote on 2018-11-05 3:17 PM:
As "Frederick Ramm" would say having external IDs is pointless when
you can do a spatial join to see what is there and what is not
On Nov. 5, 2018 3:05 p.m., "John Whelan"
As "Frederick Ramm" would say having external IDs is pointless when you can
do a spatial join to see what is there and what is not
On Nov. 5, 2018 3:05 p.m., "John Whelan" wrote:
Something that has come up in the Netherlands is they did an import then
try to update the buildings once a month.
Something that has come up in the Netherlands is they did an import then
try to update the buildings once a month. By having some sort of id tag
on the building their feeling is it makes it much easier to pick out new
buildings.
On the technical side would we have such an id on the building
Great idea John
John
On Sun, Nov 4, 2018, 16:48 john whelan I've started the process off by an introductory post to the import mailing
> list and we are working on a wiki page which will be based on the Stat
> Canada City of Ottawa import wiki page.
>
> Cheerio John
>
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, 7:34
I've started the process off by an introductory post to the import mailing
list and we are working on a wiki page which will be based on the Stat
Canada City of Ottawa import wiki page.
Cheerio John
On Fri, 2 Nov 2018, 7:34 pm James if anyone needs a TM or micro data service, I'm available for
if anyone needs a TM or micro data service, I'm available for this
On Fri., Nov. 2, 2018, 7:32 p.m. John Whelan This approach seems very sensible however Pierre has raised the issue of
> poorly mapped buildings and we are aware that some were mapped in a
> mapathon environment so whilst Ottawa
This approach seems very sensible however Pierre has raised the issue of
poorly mapped buildings and we are aware that some were mapped in a
mapathon environment so whilst Ottawa used a"leave existing buildings
alone" approach is this an area where some judgement should be used?
and yes I am
Of course.
Could use the ottawa import approach: "leave existing buildings alone".
Matthew Darwin
matt...@mdarwin.ca
http://www.mdarwin.ca
On 2018-11-02 7:03 p.m., OSM Volunteer stevea wrote:
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:58 PM, John Whelan wrote:
So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import
I think we should identify who would like to be involved in import for
each municipality. (on a wiki page). On the page, identify roles,
like:
* coordinator
* import data preparation
* QA
* import execution
* data enrichment (commercial, residential, etc... tagging)
* etc..
Then we
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:58 PM, John Whelan wrote:
> So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import plan in the wiki which
> says the data is approved for import and should be tackled in chunks of some
> sort of region since we are a decentralized organization. Which I think is
> similar to
So to paraphrase your reply. A centralised import plan in the wiki
which says the data is approved for import and should be tackled in
chunks of some sort of region since we are a decentralized
organization. Which I think is similar to the way Task Manager works.
The project is broken
On Nov 2, 2018, at 3:35 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:
> La rédaction d' une page wiki pour l'ensemble du Canada peut répondre aux
> exigences du groupe Import de OSM. Mais l'organisation doit être
> décentralisée.
Je conviens qu'il est plus facile de rédiger un "plan d'importation" unique
pour
Pour le Québec, je retrouve les données de plusieurs municipalitésMontréal,
Longueuil, Repentigny, Shawinigan, Québec et Rimouski.
Première observation rapide, aussi, elles sont de bonne qualité et proviennent
je suppose des cadastres des municipalités. En milieu urbain, cela facilite
beaucoup
/modified
thousands of them (Canvec buildings) and I would not like to see all
of them coming back.
Daniel
*From:*James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, November 2, 2018 16:07
*To:* john whelan
*Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
*Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada new building outlines
I know the City of Kingston are very interested in the project but they
aren't the ones who can make the decision.
Cheerio John
James wrote on 2018-11-02 4:07 PM:
From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and
accurate(again I didn't check all the cities nor do I expect them all
:07
> *To:* john whelan
> *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada new building outlines Open Data do
> we wish to import it?
>
>
>
> From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and accurate(again
> I didn't check all the cities
From: James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 16:07
To: john whelan
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Stats Canada new building outlines Open Data do we wish
to import it?
From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and accurate(again I
didn't
>From my initial glance at the data...seems pretty good and accurate(again I
didn't check all the cities nor do I expect them all to be having same
level of accuracy)
The two I've been eye balling are Kingston and Rimouski which seem to be
very accurate at first assessment. If we do want to
18 matches
Mail list logo
