Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import

2015-07-08 Thread Paul Norman
On 7/8/2015 2:40 AM, James wrote: Has anyone else had issues with the conversion script from GML to osm? I've been looking at the wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase/Import_How-To and when I try to convert the data python gives me the : UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import

2015-07-08 Thread James
Has anyone else had issues with the conversion script from GML to osm? I've been looking at the wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geobase/Import_How-To and when I try to convert the data python gives me the : UnicodeDecodeError: 'ascii' codec can't decode byte 0xae in position 2:

[Talk-ca] Geobase Import Announcement - 1 year later

2009-11-13 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi all, on Tuesday, nov 17th, i'll be broadcasting live on uStream.tv available on skype IRC. 'cause i work nights im available anytime. (3am /6am 9am/12p/6p/9pmPST is fine for me) please let me know 1 day in advance of what time is best that you can watch, then i can plan (sleep) accordingly.

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import conflict to share victoria.osm

2009-07-20 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi all, I'm finding an interesting revelation here. Since the RoadMatcher wasn't done, for this mapped area. What we did was make the greater_victoria.osm file available. So here we have myself, who is running around in circles, and wanting to copy over all the area, as fast as possible, but im

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase import seems to have problems with the old data (yahoo, wikipedia..)

2009-07-14 Thread Sam Vekemans
When replying cc: talk-ca list, Sorry i can help much further than my previous explanation. I agree that yes, it would be easier to wipe out existing work that people did (before hearing the OK for the geobase License) (november 2008), but that was 2 years prior of hand manual mapping that people

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase import woes...

2009-01-26 Thread James Ewen
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Steve Singer ssinger...@sympatico.ca wrote: Would the ability to merge only selected items from one layer to the next make this substantially easier? Yes, indeed it would. Instead of deleting everything I don't want, then merging, reloading all, deleting

[Talk-ca] GeoBase import more questions and ideas

2009-01-01 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi Dale, in answer to the other questions; I have a question to throw out there... Can someone point me to an API or tutorial or something for OSM that discusses uploading manipulating the data (in a way that could be scripted)? I've seen the web interface, but obviously that is no good for

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase import more questions and ideas

2009-01-01 Thread richard
Dale asked some things and Sam answered below: I'm of the impression that there are: a) a set of built in 'tags' that the rendering engine uses. (is there an exhaustive list anywhere) These should get you started. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Update

2008-12-23 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi,Thanks for added the 'prelude' section :) I'll move that (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalogue) up on the list of things todo. If knowone else beets me to it. :) I updated my blog http://acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com/2008/12/geobase-import-update-summery-rev-5.html Probably

[Talk-ca] GeoBase import discussion Re: Talk-ca Digest, Vol 10, Issue 18

2008-12-17 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi, very sorry i forgot to add you on the direct list before i sent it out. I'm pleased to see that all the discussions were done direct from those who deal with the data (the guy that did the Tiger Import, and the guy from the Yukon, and from UBC) I think i just need to talk to someone from

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Another idea

2008-12-17 Thread Sam Vekemans
Hi here's another 2 cents in the bucket. ... IMO were better off working from the ground up, and getting local areas to ask builders/road planners to post the updates, as soon as construction is finished rather than wait for information to be passed along the government channels. So

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Another idea

2008-12-17 Thread Kevin Farrugia
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.comwrote: Hi here's another 2 cents in the bucket. ... IMO were better off working from the ground up, and getting local areas to ask builders/road planners to post the updates, as soon as construction is finished

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Another idea

2008-12-17 Thread James Ewen
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: ... IMO were better off working from the ground up, and getting local areas to ask builders/road planners to post the updates, as soon as construction is finished rather than wait for information to be

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase import update Rev. 3

2008-12-13 Thread James Ewen
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:45 PM, Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com wrote: D -are we in unanamous agreement that the way to do the import is to; Create a program which will detect existing OSM data and add the UUID# reference onto the point/way/polygon/relation so that it will not

[Talk-ca] geobase import summary

2008-12-11 Thread Andrew Allison
Hello: I'm looking forward to the geobase data import. From reading the various emails have I grasped the options correctly? Initial ideas: 1 - Delete all of OSM Canada and replace with geobase data. 2 - Just upload the geobase data and have users clean it up. 3

Re: [Talk-ca] geobase import summery

2008-12-11 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks Andrew,I have updated the wiki, and my comment on each users talk page. Hopefully it is a little more clear now. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:GeoBase_Import#What_to_do_with_current_data And of course, its wiki, so everything is questionable. Cheers, Sam Vekemans Across Canada

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import Rev 2 - where we stand now CanVec (like Ibycus before combined maps)

2008-12-09 Thread Michel Gilbert
2008/12/9 Steve Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Sam Vekemans wrote: So anyway... No bother with GeoBase anymore... as it's CanVec which has all the data already done. With respect to the road network one thing to consider is update frequency. The Canvec data is updated

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-07 Thread Steve Singer
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Steve Singer wrote: Do we have a handle on: To attempt to answer my own question. a) How many tiles have 0 OSM roads (but do have at least 1 road in the geobase nrn) It looks like 245 of the 250k (4 digit) NTS tiles have at least 1 'road' in OSM (see note 1). I do not

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-07 Thread Sam Vekemans
Thanks Steve for the breakdown :) I need to announce a couple points: 1 Calgary sits smack in the middle of 4 tiles, and same with other cities, so that estimate 8, needs to be taken in as 4 of the '40' estimate. And winnipeg could be also like that too. 2 (imo) when Dale started producing the

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-07 Thread Steve Singer
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008, Steve Singer wrote: My previous numbers were wrong, they excluded more data than they included. Looking at planet_osm_roads isn't correct, planet_osm_line with highwaynull seems to be what should have been using. It looks like 245 of the 250k (4 digit) NTS tiles have at

[Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread Sam Vekemans
Ok, cool :) Lots of great discussion points.Again, I'll try to summarize with this info, and hopefully setting somethings as a foundation. (in story form) Basic questions: What do we want to accomplish with the OpenStreetMap project? and What do we want to accomplish from Geobase? Here's IMO

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread Michel Gilbert
2008/12/6 Sam Vekemans [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ok, cool :) Lots of great discussion points.Again, I'll try to summarize with this info, and hopefully setting somethings as a foundation. (in story form) Basic questions: What do we want to accomplish with the OpenStreetMap project? and What do

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread Steve Singer
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Sam Vekemans wrote: IF the prime purpose IS to complete the road network across Canada, then in doing so this will cause issues. This is because, technically speaking. The GeoBase road database IS ALREADY the complete road network across Canada. Period. With future

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread Steve Singer
On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Michel Gilbert wrote: I need some clarification about the parallel database (PostGIS). I am sure I see the whole picture of the Geobase Import process. Who is going to host the change tracking PostGIS database ? How are we going to access it ? I prefer a process model that

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread datkin
There seems to be some general confusion around on exactly what is part of the Geobase dataset. (someone can correct me if I'm the one confused). The Geobase road network is split by province, not NTS grid. All this talk about grids. Next, most of the data on my maps comes not from

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread Michel Gilbert
2008/12/6 Steve Singer [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sat, 6 Dec 2008, Michel Gilbert wrote: I need some clarification about the parallel database (PostGIS). I am sure I see the whole picture of the Geobase Import process. Who is going to host the change tracking PostGIS database ? How are we going

Re: [Talk-ca] GeoBase Import - Where we stand now

2008-12-06 Thread James Ewen
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Michel Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However when i have done some tests to import Geobase data into osm I did not use intermidiate storage. Here's what i have done: Read osm data (bounding box) Read Geobase data in shape file (same bounding box)

Re: [Talk-ca] Geobase import idea render=no

2008-11-25 Thread Michel Gilbert
Hi, Thank you Sam to bring good ideas. I agree with you that if we put the data available on OSM it will create a bigger community around the OSM. The 'render=no' tag is a good idea to flag conflicts or potential conflicts. But first, we should develop automatic import processes to load without

Re: [Talk-ca] Geobase import by provinces

2008-11-21 Thread michcasa
Corey: The Kamploops example was to validate the change detection process and import. The boundary cutting was arbitrary. I think we can import by bounding box of 0.5 degree for example and make sure to have overlaps. That way I would have catch the error you indicate. Richard: The

Re: [Talk-ca] Geobase import by provinces

2008-11-20 Thread michcasa
May be I was not clear. I agree with you, user effort is very important and we should keep existing OSM data. However Geobase data will provide a very very very good coverage and accuracy where no OSM data is available. The use of Geobase data will allow the users to work locally to improve

Re: [Talk-ca] Geobase import by provinces

2008-11-20 Thread Corey Burger
Ah interesting. I can see you did some boundary cutting, which tends to produce wierd errors: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.647426lon=-120.342335zoom=18layers=B000FTF How does this work if you have major roads mapped out but not the interior ones? There are lots of places on the edges of