On 16 June 2011 17:50, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
Here is as much information as I can give. It is not conclusive so I would
summarise by saying that I *personally* (great emphasis!) have some
contributions derived from OS StreetView data and have accepted the new
terms without
On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 13:50 +0100, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
If I've understood things correctly, the CTs (in particular Clause 2)
go further than ODbL compatibility, and require you to have additional
rights to grant to OSMF on your contributions. My reading of clause 2
is that it
If OSMF were to claim that the CTs prove that all its data is
relicensable to anything that's free and open then they're daft. In
practice it's relicensable to something that's a bit narrower than
that, and which would almost certainly comply with the spirit of the
OS license, if not the
zomg, kothic looks awesome, I'll definitely be giving that a whirl. :-)
On 16 Jun 2011, at 22:24, Graham Jones wrote:
Hi Adam,
The kothic system that Richard pointed you to is well worth a look - it
renders very pretty maps. I think it uses a styling language similar to the
'carto' one I
On 17 June 2011 14:11, Henry Gomersall h...@cantab.net wrote:
Well, since the contributor terms are an agreement made as a
contributor, one is not necessarily making any statement about the
compatibility of OS open data
I'm sorry, but if you've used OS OpenData in previous contributions,
On 17 June 2011 14:19, Richard Mann richard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
If OSMF were to claim that the CTs prove that all its data is
relicensable to anything that's free and open then they're daft. In
practice it's relicensable to something that's a bit narrower than
that, and which
Robert wrote:
My reading of clause 2
is that it requires your contributions to be able to be
distributed
under any free and open license. Some have disputed this view,
claiming that the intent of the CTs is only that you must warrant
that
your data is compatible with the current licenses.
You keep mentioning the OSMF when I think you really mean the LWG.
On 6/17/2011 9:44 AM, Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
On 17 June 2011 14:19, Richard Mannrichard.mann.westoxf...@gmail.com wrote:
If OSMF were to claim that the CTs prove that all its data is
relicensable to anything that's free
8 matches
Mail list logo
