On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 20:08 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
> On 03/05/12 19:11, Andy Street wrote:
> > This hypothetical track follows the route of an ancient pathway and is
> > used more by the plethora of dog walkers from the nearby village than by
> > Farmer Giles. Surely by your logic this shoul
On 02/05/12 16:41, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>>>One project goal might be to consolidate the various scattered
>>>information on the wiki describing how to map RoWs in the first place.
>>>Come up with *one* consensus approach. We seem to be settling on
>>>designation=* + highway={foot,cycle,bridle}
[... (g) stray dogs, (h) those that are included in this classification,
(i) those that tremble as if they were mad ...]
On 03/05/12 19:11, Andy Street wrote:
> This hypothetical track follows the route of an ancient pathway and is
> used more by the plethora of dog walkers from the nearby village
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 18:02 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
> > The thing I dislike about footway, bridleway, etc. is that they mix the
> > physical characteristics with access information. Using your definition
> > above I can think of a number of foottracks, bridletracks and even a
> > footunclassi
("Where's the path?", "Yes it does, doesn't it?")
On 03/05/12 14:47, Andy Street wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:58 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
>> By now, h=footway seems merely a specialisation of h=path. The _only_
>> information it adds is that it's normally used by pedestrians, or that
>>
**>>**>>* I contacted Hampshire County Council last week but haven't
had a*>>* response yet.*
>Is there a standard letter we are using to ask for this information?
>
>David
I was intending to produce a standard letter and will post it here
when its done (might take me a week as I've got lots to d
On Thursday 03 May 2012, Tom Chance wrote:
> On 3 May 2012 14:59, Derick Rethans wrote:
>
> > I've done addr:flats=1-18 before which I saw was in use:
> >
> > 14:57 Derick: Tag addr:flats has 1468 values and appears
> > 5220 times in the planet.
> > 14:58 Derick: Tag addr:flatnumber has 68 valu
On 3 May 2012 14:59, Derick Rethans wrote:
> I've done addr:flats=1-18 before which I saw was in use:
>
> 14:57 Derick: Tag addr:flats has 1468 values and appears
> 5220 times in the planet.
> 14:58 Derick: Tag addr:flatnumber has 68 values and appears
> 113 times in the planet.
>
Great, thank
On Thu, 3 May 2012, Matt Williams wrote:
> On 3 May 2012 14:42, Tom Chance wrote:
> > Is there a good way to tag flats within a building so that it is clear the
> > flat numbers (e.g. 1-12) correspond with the building and not with the
> > street? These are two examples I'm struggling with:
> >
>
I’ve used addr:flatnumber occasionally, but doubt anything currently
uses it judging by the overall low usage figures:
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/addr%3Aflatnumber
So in your example it would be something like
addr:flatnumber=1-12
addr:housename=Honor Oak Mansions
and add the
On 3 May 2012 14:42, Tom Chance wrote:
> Is there a good way to tag flats within a building so that it is clear the
> flat numbers (e.g. 1-12) correspond with the building and not with the
> street? These are two examples I'm struggling with:
>
> A block of flats, 1-12 Honor Oak Mansions, sits on
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:58 +0100, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
> We both agree on using designation. This is good.
+1
> Would you also agree that h=paths are generally too narrow to use in a
> 4-wheeled vehicle? After all, that's what h=tracks or the other road
> types are intended for.
Generally, ye
Is there a good way to tag flats within a building so that it is clear the
flat numbers (e.g. 1-12) correspond with the building and not with the
street? These are two examples I'm struggling with:
A block of flats, 1-12 Honor Oak Mansions, sits on Underhill Road. The
block doesn't have a number f
On 02/05/12 16:41, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
>>One project goal might be to consolidate the various scattered
>>information on the wiki describing how to map RoWs in the first place.
>>Come up with *one* consensus approach. We seem to be settling on
>>designation=* + highway={foot,cycle,bridle}way, by
On 03/05/12 10:22, Jonathan Harley wrote:
> +1 for prefixes to designate a country on features which are already
> geographically located in a country being bonkers.
Putting the discussion back ion track again, I suspect it's really
jurisdictional rather than country-based, even if the objects we'
- Original Message -
From: "Andy Street"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2012 5:51 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Have you contacted a UK local authority in regards to
Rights of Way?
On Wed, 2012-05-02 at 16:22 +, rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
The second of a few emails from me
>P.S. Please don't yawn in your emails, it's rude.
Seconded. There's no need for this sort of disrespectful rudeness and sarcasm
on this list.
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Anyone who uses the phrase "tagging for the renderer" deserves a yawn
(though I agree that forbearance is a virtue).
I also agree that single tagging is preferable, but if we can't agree
which, that's just a recipe for edit wars. And destroying data that other
people are using is exceedingly rude.
On 02/05/12 16:38, Chris Hill wrote:
On 02/05/12 16:29, Andrew Chadwick wrote:
designation=* has been evolving recently, and has added some open land
classifications:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:designation#UK_Protected_Areas
With the proliferation of these designation codes, would
On 30 April 2012 10:23, Richard Mann wrote:
> Which (yawn) is not a bad thing:
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Brian Prangle wrote:
>>
>> IMHO it's either a track on the main highway (cycleway=track) or a
>> separate track (hig
Andy wrote:
> I contacted Hampshire County Council last week but haven't had a
> response yet.
I haven't made a formal approach to Essex CC, but have been trying
to build up a good relationship with their PROW team by reporting
blocked paths, broken stiles, fallen direction posts and the l
21 matches
Mail list logo
