(The aim of this email is to provide prior knowledge of an upcoming
change to the
OSM website and to give you an opportunity to provide constructive feedback)
(I posted this email to the "talk" mailing list last Tuesday. Since
then we had some
great feedback and changes have been made to the desig
Probably one of the best example areas is Lincolnshire which was very poorly
mapped indeed prior to OS Opendata or Bing imagery being available.
Afterwards there was a push by some to at least get the road network in by
armchair mapping. Any analysis like this needs to consider the timing of
data r
On 15/11/13 14:08, Abhishek wrote:
> - what explains certain regions getting a lot of new highways while
> other not? I'm talking about areas like Suffolk (but not Norfolk),
> Lancashire but not North Yorkshire? There are many such examples.
Norfolk just didn't have any active mappers at that time
Hi,
I've been working on trying to understand what impact OS OpenData had
on OSM in the UK.
As a first cut, I looked at all objects with the following properties
in the gb history extract upto 2012:
- version = 1
- name not equal to blank
- highway = residential, footway, service, unclassified, t
4 matches
Mail list logo
