Many thanks Nick and Michael. I obviously need to do more RTFM. :)
I did some digging in the Help panel and found that there are several
out-of-date lists of iD shortcuts.
To get the Measurements panel to appear I have to press CTRL+I, not M,
at least in the Opera browser.
The scalebar is u
Ctrl + Shift + M for the measurement panel which shows the length of a
way or dimensions of an area.
Ctrl + Shift + B, H or L also show other info panels.
On 05/05/2019 18:18, Martin Wynne wrote:
p.s. Am I missing something? How can I see the actual dimensions of an
element in the iD editor?
Hi,
The scale is on the bottom left of the window - the length of line
varies according to the amount of zoom you use. It's there on the main
OSM website when you are viewing as well. Very easy to miss.
Regards
Nick(Tallguy)
On Sun, 2019-05-05 at 18:18 +0100, Martin Wynne wrote:
> On 05/05/2019 17:
On 05/05/2019 17:39, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Given the small width of the ditch, I wouldn't bother with the separate
way, but just put the ford & handrail tags on the intersecting node.
The way you've mapped it the ford & handrail are 5 metres in length.
Thanks Dave.
I have shortened it to
Given the small width of the ditch, I wouldn't bother with the separate
way, but just put the ford & handrail tags on the intersecting node.
The way you've mapped it the ford & handrail are 5 metres in length.
On 05/05/2019 17:19, Martin Wynne wrote:
Got a Link?
If you're mapping linear ways
Got a Link?
If you're mapping linear ways a node at their intersection with ford=yes
is required.
Thanks Dave. I have now added an intersection node, which has fixed the
error.
However, it seems a bit odd to have to do that? It means there are now 2
elements tagged ford=yes, an intersectio
On 05/05/2019 15:52, Martin Wynne wrote:
n.b. the iD editor is now showing this as an error: "Stream crosses
foot path", even though tagged as a ford.
Got a Link?
If you're mapping linear ways a node at their intersection with ford=yes
is required.
___
On 05/05/2019 14:42, Dave F via Talk-GB wrote:
Hi
I'm not convinced it's a bridge
I would tag your example as a ford=yes, handrail=yes.
DaveF
Thanks all.
I'm also not convinced it's a bridge. There is no evidence of any other
structure at each end of the handrail. I suspect the small bi
Hi
I'm not convinced it's a bridge.
There's no clear evidence of a raised footway. A piece of wood dropped
in the stream, is probably just a piece of wood dropped in the stream.
I've two similar examples close to me; one wood the other a cast iron
frame. They're for the user to steady themselve
:24:22 PM
> *To:* Talk GB
> *Subject:* [Talk-GB] Is this a footbridge?
>
> Is this a footbridge? Or maybe a ford? Stepping stones?
>
> There is a solid handrail, but only a small plank of rotten wood, about
> 2ft long by 4 inches wide, dropped in the mud:
&g
I'm guessing it was a footbridge, and now needs repair.
From: Martin Wynne
Sent: Sunday, May 5, 2019 1:24:22 PM
To: Talk GB
Subject: [Talk-GB] Is this a footbridge?
Is this a footbridge? Or maybe a ford? Stepping stones?
There is a solid handrail, but o
Is this a footbridge? Or maybe a ford? Stepping stones?
There is a solid handrail, but only a small plank of rotten wood, about
2ft long by 4 inches wide, dropped in the mud:
http://85a.uk/plank_bridge.jpg
Thanks,
Martin.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
12 matches
Mail list logo
