On 29 August 2013 09:42, sk53.osm sk53@gmail.com wrote:
comparable to the European Environment Agency's Urban Atlas. The slides are
here. I think there are enough details in the methodology for anyone to
You might have warned me about the size of the document, so I
downloaded it at off
On 28 August 2013 23:15, Dudley Ibbett dudleyibb...@hotmail.com wrote:
This would perhaps suggest they should be marked as ways with barrier=hedge
and hedge=line_of_trees or perhaps just the latter.
An alternative might be to use natural=tree_row which is defined in the wiki
but the examples
The entire landcover tag discussion on the wiki is a huge distraction,and
not based on any objective criteria, let alone an attempt to see if what we
have works.
I, on the other hand, gave a paper at SotM-Eu in 2011 which showed that use
of existing tags could provide a level of
is restricted to
an area but it seems you can directly tag a way as scrub.
Regards
Dudley
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 06:30:23 +0100
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Lines of Trees along river banks etc.
From: sk53@gmail.com
To: dudleyibb...@hotmail.com
CC: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
I don't think
Hi
I was wondering if anyone has been mapping these? Quite often I come across
streams and rivers where there are dense lines of trees along the river banks.
Occasional I find lines of trees which seem to be remnant hedgerows where the
shrubs have been removed.
Looking on line it would
I don't think these are hedgerows at all. They are really relict river
gallery woodland (usually *Salicion albae,*
NVChttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodland_and_scrub_communities_in_the_British_National_Vegetation_Classification_systemW6)
and I would expect are mainly Willows with the odd Poplar
6 matches
Mail list logo
