2009/8/26 Mark Williams :
> Thomas Wood wrote:
> []
>>
>> Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
>> as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
>> (Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane python
>> environment)
>>
>
> Good, tha
On 26 Aug 2009, at 18:46, Mark Williams wrote:
> Thomas Wood wrote:
> []
>> Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
>> as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
>> (Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane
>> python
>> envi
Thomas Wood wrote:
[]
> Regarding remaining counties, Essex is definitely a priority, we may
> as well just upload the remaining counties as and when we can.
> (Which'll probably be when the new dev server is up with a sane python
> environment)
>
Good, thanks for that - I am hoping to go round m
2009/8/26 Thomas Wood :
> 2009/8/26 Peter Miller :
>>
>> On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
>>
>>> 2009/8/17 Thomas Wood :
I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped with
severa
2009/8/26 Peter Miller :
>
> On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> 2009/8/17 Thomas Wood :
>>>
>>> I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
>>> around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped with
>>> several counties.
>>>
>>> As such, I'll
On 20 Aug 2009, at 13:21, Thomas Wood wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Thomas Wood :
>> I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
>> around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped
>> with
>> several counties.
>>
>> As such, I'll start with Hull, Greater London an
2009/8/17 Thomas Wood :
> I'll start the imports tomorrow. I think it'd be wise to spread them
> around the country so one group of people aren't entirely swamped with
> several counties.
>
> As such, I'll start with Hull, Greater London and Suffolk, mostly
> picked based on the impression of eager
On 19 Aug 2009, at 12:49, Jason Cunningham wrote:
I found the wiki page giving advice on merging.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data
But it does need updating. It mentions removing a 'source tag' which
doesnt appear to be used, and mentio
Jason Cunningham wrote:
>Sent: 19 August 2009 12:49 PM
>To: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] NAPTAN update?
>
>I found the wiki page giving advice on merging.
>http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN
>_and_OSM_data
>
&g
> - switch the naptan:verified tag to "yes"
I think the wiki suggests deleting the tag, because once verified it
is no longer needed and just clutters the database.
Ed
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/
I found the wiki page giving advice on merging.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:NaPTAN/Surveying_and_Merging_NaPTAN_and_OSM_data
But it does need updating. It mentions removing a 'source tag' which doesnt
appear to be used, and mentions merging using software but I cant see a way
to do tha
On Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:27:37 +0100, Jason Cunningham wrote:
> Is there any guidance showing how we should deal with these new bus stop?
> Just looking at my local area, many of the new ones are in the wrong
place.
> But I cant simply move them because there is already a bus stop in the
> correct l
f
> catch-all which does not actually display merged stops but everything that
> is not explicitely marked finished or *not* merged.
>
>
> Cheers
>
> Andy
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
> >boun...@o
rged stops but everything that
is not explicitely marked finished or *not* merged.
Cheers
Andy
>-Original Message-
>From: talk-gb-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-gb-
>boun...@openstreetmap.org] On Behalf Of Oliver Lewis
>Sent: 18 August 2009 3:14 PM
>To: talk-gb@
I think it's worth putting the source tag on future imports. I came across
this when I wanted to add ";yahoo" as opposed to ";survey". I placed the
original nodes so I'm mainly deleting those and moving the naptans back into
the same position.
Thanks for your work on this.
Any chance of keeping
2009/8/10 Shaun McDonald :
> Hi Tom,
>
> This is being discussed on the talk-transit mailing list:
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
>
> Thomas Wood who is doing the import is on holiday for a couple of weeks at
> the moment if I remember right.
I was, I'm back now.
> Progres
Hi Tom,
This is being discussed on the talk-transit mailing list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-transit
Thomas Wood who is doing the import is on holiday for a couple of
weeks at the moment if I remember right.
Progress status will be available on
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org
Hi there,
Looking at the wiki and talk-transit archives, it looks like we're close to
imports for the rest of the country after the successful trial in the West
Midlands.
It would be really helpful if somebody could notify this list when more
imports begin, and even lay out a timetable. I'm sure
18 matches
Mail list logo
