On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 07:13 +0100, Lester Caine wrote:
The other activity around here is 'aerial', such as microlight and hot
air
ballooning, and in those cases CHANGES to fied boundaries - which
these days are
not as stable as even OS would seem to imply - are something that
would be very
Dave
So sorry to hear that you only walk in good weather. Approx. 240 km of
walking with GPS receiver so far this year ;-) ...
but of course you are right in saying that field boundaries near paths
(whether or not PROWs) are the most important. My point was simply that
OSM is unlikely
Dave F. wrote:
Mike Harris wrote:
The lack of public right of way information is disappointing - but it
is within OSM's capabilities to walk and map it. However, the lack of
field boundary information is a serious deficiency as these are
invaluable in practice to walkers attempting to plan,
Mike Harris wrote:
The lack of public right of way information is disappointing - but it
is within OSM's capabilities to walk and map it. However, the lack of
field boundary information is a serious deficiency as these are
invaluable in practice to walkers attempting to plan, navigate,
Despite being disappointed at the lack of public right of way/field boundary
info in the OS releases, I have to admit that VectorMap District does *look*
very nice, kind of like Landranger minus contours and footpaths.
So I'm wondering, would it be possible to create maps which combine the
and contours from SRTM (or even the OS's own contour data, if that's
better than SRTM?)
To give you an idea of what the contours from the OS Land-Form PANORAMA
Contour dataset look like, I've taken a small section of the Cheshire Peak
District, centred on the hill Shutlingsloe.
See what
6 matches
Mail list logo
