Hi,
On 10/23/2015 05:19 PM, ael wrote:
> Personally, I think that they should be blocked until they provide a
> proper explanation. The sheer scale is highly suspicious.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/828
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09"
On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:01:16PM +0100, Dave F. wrote:
> Adding accurate data is, of course, improving OSM, but only if it's from an
> allowable source.
>
> The lack of communication implies there's something to hide.
Personally, I think that they should be blocked until they provide a
proper
Hello again.
User Zain Ahmad Hashmi is still at it with "Improving road network"
edits ,which as far as I can see are just adding maxweight tags. The
couple I've
checked seem legit, but the edits are wide spread implying it's not
local knowledge. I'm correct in thinking there's no open
I had been meaning to express my concerns over dataOne with the list,
although as I added a new changeset comment yesterday and pm'd him
about one from last week which he has not responded to, I was waiting
for one more edit that so far hasn't happened.
My concern has been over a very large
If their edits are factually correct, they are improving OSM which is a
good thing. But they should really engage more with the community so we
can see where all this wisdom is coming from, what they are working
towards and who is behind it. Failure to respond to the many enquiries
does not
For info - I've added a comment to the discussion on
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34799530 (a recent changeset by
Zain Ahmad Hashmi) and also one to
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34777018 (dataOne).
It'd certainly be interesting to see what correlation there is between
AFAIK Kent doesn't go round putting 2m width limits on country lanes -
more likely to be 6'6" "except for access". A random spot-check on his
most recent changesets with Google Streetview shows indeed 6'6" "except
for access" so he may actually be correct, except for the discutable
correctness
Adding accurate data is, of course, improving OSM, but only if it's from
an allowable source.
The lack of communication implies there's something to hide.
Dave F.
On 22/10/2015 21:34, Colin Smale wrote:
If their edits are factually correct, they are improving OSM which is
a good thing. But
Found another misleading “merging into 1 way to tag restriction”:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34080708
—Amaroussi
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Hi,
On 10/05/2015 05:21 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
> I'm away for a few days dodging raindrops in Wales so won't be able to deal
> with it directly
Blocked both
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/815
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/816
with a polite request for explanation.
I'm not on irc much at the moment, sorry. In general you can ping
d...@osmfoundation.org with requests for mapper blocks, supplying context.
This sounds like a call for a zero-hour block, which obliges the mapper to log
in and read messages before editing.
I will have a look when i get off
Ah, I'm some way behind the times ;)
On October 6, 2015 12:40:48 PM GMT+01:00, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 10/05/2015 05:21 PM, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> I'm away for a few days dodging raindrops in Wales so won't be able
>to deal with it directly
>
>Blocked both
>
Hi all,
Just had the same thing happen near me (Croydon) but by a different
user (Zain Ahmad Hashmi, e.g.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/34443141).
The only thing that occurred to me is that all the edits involved ways
passing over or under railway lines... although like Dave F I can't
Dataone is at it again. He's not replied to my post.
As each edit is an individual changeset & therefore laborious to revert,
I think a temporary stop should be placed on him (both?) just until
their attentions are grabbed. Is there anyone on this forum able to it
or should I post in the talk
Message either SomeoneElse or zool in #talk-gb.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Mon Oct 5 12:31:09 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote:
> Dataone is at it again. He's not replied to my post.
>
> As each edit is an individual changeset & therefore laborious to revert,
> I think a temporary stop should be placed
dress.
Cheers,
Andy (SomeoneElse)
Original Message
From: Philip Barnes
Sent: Monday, 5 October 2015 12:37
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] User dataone: "splitting into 2 way to tag restriction "
Message either SomeoneElse or zool in #talk-gb.
Phil (trigpoint)
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] User dataone: "splitting into 2 way to tag restriction "
Message either SomeoneElse or zool in #talk-gb.
Phil (trigpoint)
On Mon Oct 5 12:31:09 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote:
Dataone is at it again. He's not replied to my post.
As each edi
Hi
A new editor has started splitting roads in my locale, but from what I
can see making no tagging amendments. Am I missing something? If not I'd
like to halt him before there's too much damage.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/dataOne/history#map=11/51.2981/-1.9753
I've sent a message
On Fri Oct 2 14:47:05 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote:
> Hi
>
> A new editor has started splitting roads in my locale, but from what I
> can see making no tagging amendments. Am I missing something? If not I'd
> like to halt him before there's too much damage.
>
>
On 02/10/15 20:26, Philip Barnes wrote:
On Fri Oct 2 14:47:05 2015 GMT+0100, Dave F. wrote:
A new editor has started splitting roads in my locale, but from what I
can see making no tagging amendments. Am I missing something? If not I'd
like to halt him before there's too much damage.
20 matches
Mail list logo