Any reason why these seem to have disappeared or is it just an incorrect edit?
If it's just a mistake I'll add Rydal Water back later, whether I have the time
to do Windermere is another matter though unfortunately...
Thanks,
Nick
___
Talk-GB mailing
What do you think is wrong with them?
They're visible in mapnik, most ways haven't been edited since
January. There does appear to be a bit of pointless overuse of
multipolygons to represent riverbanks, but nothing that makes them
'missing'.
Dave F.
: -
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
Date: 24/03/2013 11:11AM
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
What do you think is wrong with them?
They're visible in mapnik, most ways haven't been edited since
January. There does appear to be a bit
@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
What do you think is wrong with them?
They're visible in mapnik, most ways haven't been edited since
January. There does appear to be a bit of pointless overuse of
multipolygons to represent riverbanks, but nothing
From: Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com
To: Nick Whitelegg nick.whitel...@solent.ac.uk
Cc: talk-gb@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, 24 March 2013, 11:49
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
On 24/03/2013 11:38, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
1. Didn't appear
The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been split
into 3 parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal Water
relation, had no tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying the
area as water.
I have joined them up, and given them the natural=water tag. Potlatch
Date: 24/03/2013 01:14PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-GB] Windermere and Rydal Water - missing
The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been split into 3
parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal Water relation, had no
tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying the area
On 24/03/2013 13:13, Roger Calvert wrote:
The problem seemed to be that the boundary of Rydal Water had been
split into 3 parts which, although they were assigned to the Rydal
Water relation, had no tags of their own. Potlatch was not identifying
the area as water.
I have joined them up, and
Dave F,
Please read the link on multipolygons:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multipolygon
Thanks for this link - there is always something to learn!
By making your edits you now incorrectly made Rydal Water a part of
the River Rothay multi-polygon.
Oops - I should have picked that
On 24/03/2013 12:46, Nick Whitelegg wrote:
To reply to your points:
1. Firstly I don't think I have ever responded in a rant style
fashion on the OSM mailing lists before, but could you please qualify
your insulting first comment? Are you simply a troll, are are you
simply so pathetic and
10 matches
Mail list logo
