Peter wrote:
Then there are the '30mph' which should for consistency be '30
mph' (with a space).
Kevin replied:
I don't see the point of editing just for consistency. Developers
should handle
leading/trailing spaces, or the lack thereof, and different
capitalisation, as
without any input
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
You should note that PotLatch2 uses the space version when using the
'simple' interface.
(What's with the L?)
And anyone who uses PotLatch will be increasing the preponderance of the '30
mph' version.
All I ask
On 13 March 2011 15:55, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 13/03/11 15:41, Ed Loach wrote:
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf. Can anyone
explain
the purpose of these edits what the the tags below even mean?
I can try, but
The bot appears to be adding a
On Wed, 2011-03-16 at 16:48 +, Peter Miller wrote:
On 13 March 2011 15:55, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 13/03/11 15:41, Ed Loach wrote:
You've probably seen the numerous edits by
chriscf. Can anyone
Tim Franois wrote on 16/03/2011 17:04:
pedant
On 16 March 2011 17:00, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Then there are the '30mph' which should for consistency be '30 mph' (with a
space).
I don't see the point of editing just for consistency. Developers should
handle leading/trailing spaces, or the lack thereof, and
On 16/03/2011 18:00, Peter Miller wrote:
My understanding is that the signed speed limits are those that must
be obeyed by those classes of vehicles that are not limited by some
other rule. I don't consider that we need to do more that we are which
is to reflect the street sign in the data.
Kevin Peat wrote on 16/03/2011 17:27:
On 16 March 2011 17:00, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com
wrote:
Then there are the '30mph' which should for consistency be
'30 mph' (with a space).
On 16 March 2011 17:43, Ian Spencer ianmspen...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin Peat wrote on 16/03/2011 17:27:
On 16 March 2011 17:00, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote:
Then there are the '30mph' which should for consistency be '30 mph' (with
a space).
I don't see the point of
On 16 March 2011 17:38, Colin Smale colin.sm...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On 16/03/2011 18:00, Peter Miller wrote:
My understanding is that the signed speed limits are those that must be
obeyed by those classes of vehicles that are not limited by some other rule.
I don't consider that we need to do
In summary, this little tag is much less simple than it may appear at
first
glance! I am very interested in getting a fuller set of this data into
OSM.
Thanks for the 'pedantic' examples of 60mph limits on dual carriageways.
Being pedantic back can anyone demonstrate the existence of a 60 mph
A few months ago there was a proposal to define defaults for given areas so
you only tag exceptions. That sounded very sensible to me, but I do not
know what happened to it.
Graham
from my phone
On 16 Mar 2011 18:59, Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net wrote:
In summary, this little tag is
On 16 March 2011 18:58, Richard Bullock rb...@cantab.net wrote:
In summary, this little tag is much less simple than it may appear at
first
glance! I am very interested in getting a fuller set of this data into
OSM.
Thanks for the 'pedantic' examples of 60mph limits on dual carriageways.
Richard Bullock wrote:
Do we *really* need to be tagging national speed limits on individual
ways?
E.g. the vast majority of roads ought to be one of;
*residential roads subject to 30mph
*rural roads subject to NSL
Perhaps we could tag the ones that differ from the above - and let
On 16/03/2011 19:31, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Richard Bullock wrote:
Do we *really* need to be tagging national speed limits on individual
ways?
E.g. the vast majority of roads ought to be one of;
*residential roads subject to 30mph
*rural roads subject to NSL
Perhaps we could tag the ones that
On 13/03/2011 12:27, Dave F. wrote:
Hi
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf.
Well, after reading up on this, I kind of understand what the
source:maxspeed is used for, but I'm not happy that chriscf has guessed
that value for key tags that were added by other users.
As
Hi
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf. Can anyone explain
the purpose of these edits what the the tags below even mean?
I've had no reply to an email sent to him a couple of days ago
In my locality, each of his edits already had a maxspeed (with units)
tag accurately mapped
On 13/03/11 12:27, Dave F. wrote:
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf. Can anyone explain
the purpose of these edits what the the tags below even mean?
I've had no reply to an email sent to him a couple of days ago
I've been wondering much the same.
In my locality, each of
He added these tags to some dual carriageway in my area that already had
speed limit tags. I was just going to delete them as they seem pointless.
Anyone know otherwise?
Kevin
On 13 Mar 2011 12:28, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Hi
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf.
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf. Can anyone
explain
the purpose of these edits what the the tags below even mean?
I can try, but
I've had no reply to an email sent to him a couple of days ago
nor have I, so it is mainly guesswork.
source:maxspeed does have a page on
On 13/03/11 15:41, Ed Loach wrote:
You've probably seen the numerous edits by chriscf. Can anyone
explain
the purpose of these edits what the the tags below even mean?
I can try, but
I've had no reply to an email sent to him a couple of days ago
nor have I, so it is mainly guesswork.
21 matches
Mail list logo
