Le 6 janvier 2013 20:53, Christophe Foucher
christophe.fouc...@gmail.coma écrit :
Oui, il s'agit bien de cette route. Me voilà rassuré !
Si j'ai bien compris, il me suffit de rétablir les tags appropriés pour la
voir revenir dans la carte.
Tu pourrais aussi par la même occasion améliorer son
Le 6 janvier 2013 19:58, Black Myst black.m...@free.fr a écrit :
Hello,
Je viens de tomber sur un cas étrange où un rond-point est utilisé dans une
frontière administrative.
Pas administrative cette frontière, mais un essai de découpage des IRIS INSEE...
La relation:
Le message suivant de :
##
Il est tout frais, tout neuf, il est là
http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewforum.php?f=12 !
a été posté sur le forum http://forum.openstreetmap.fr/viewforum.php?f=6t=0
Une réponse par mail sur l'adresse d'expédition n'arrivera nulle part
Une réponse à la
いいだです。
OSMで、過去のデータや歴史的なデータを扱いたいひとたちのテレカンファレンスがあるみたいです。
シアトル時間で9日のAM9:00なので、日本時間だと10日のAM2:00です。
今回話題に上がってるのはざっくりというと、
・過去データOSM専用 Planetの構築について
・過去データOSM専用 Planetの、書き込みテスト用サーバ構築について（Sandboxってやつです）
・最初にどのあたりの地域をターゲットにしたらよいかの検討。地域ごとに分割していても可。
っていうかんじです。
個人的にすごく面白いテーマだと思っていて、
安藤です。
表記部分はちょっとおいておいて。
例に挙げられた、アズナスやアンスリーは自身のHPで、コンビニだと名乗っているので、コンビニだと分類しました。
べつの方向から考えると、
もちろん感覚的ものですが、
JR西のkioskのように、小島のような店舗や、自動ドアなどで仕切られていないような店舗がキオスクだと思うのですがいかがでしょう？
大阪市内の人しかわからないかもしれないですが、地下鉄の駅売店が多くファミマに変わりました。
こちらは、駅ファミと名乗っており、キオスクに分類すべきものかと思います。
2013年1月7日月曜日 Yoichi SEINO
清野です。
安藤さんありがとうございます。
確かにWebサイトではコンビニ、もしくはコンビニエンスストアと名乗っていますね。
調査不足で失礼致しました。
ただ、名乗っているのと実態とはどうなのでしょうか…?
安藤さんのおっしゃるように、
JR西のkioskのように、小島のような店舗や、自動ドアなどで仕切られていないような店舗がキオスクだと思うのですがいかがでしょう？
というのは僕も同じ感覚を持っています。
でも、よく考えると、日本の場合は駅構内のマッピングをしないとあまりkioskタグを付ける機会はないので、
現状ではあまり登場しないものかもしれませんね。
On 6 January 2013 01:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
I prefer landuse areas to be darker than the default light gray background
color in the Standard rendering. This makes it obvious (especially on LCD
screens where lightness/luminance of colors vary depending on the viewing
I recently deleted a doodle in Hay-on-Wye, but after doing so noticed
that to there northwest there seem to be a cycle path and a footpath
_very_ close together:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.073537lon=-3.130221zoom=18layers=M
I guess that this could be correct, but presumably it's
On 06/01/2013 14:02, SomeoneElse wrote:
I recently deleted a doodle in Hay-on-Wye, but after doing so noticed
that to there northwest there seem to be a cycle path and a footpath
_very_ close together:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.073537lon=-3.130221zoom=18layers=M
I guess that this
SomeoneElse wrote:
I recently deleted a doodle in Hay-on-Wye, but after doing so noticed that to
there northwest there seem to be a cycle path and a footpath _very_ close
together:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=52.073537lon=-3.130221zoom=18layers=M
I guess that this could be correct, but
Lester Caine wrote:
So probably just a case that your deletion needs rolling back.
Just to clarify - I've not deleted the duplicate footway and cycleway.
What I deleted was this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/199683324/history
If you look at it in P1 it's an obvious untagged
The following changeset by a new mapper near Leyland appears problematical:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14536266
It doesn't appear to be malicious - it looks like it's a case of delete
everything and redraw it badly.
An example is:
On 06/01/2013 10:13, Robert Whittaker (OSM lists) wrote:
On 6 January 2013 01:54, Eugene Alvin Villar sea...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first proposal, I find it very difficult to see the difference
between the farmland and the non-tagged areas. It's a bit easier in
the second proposal. It could
Philip Barnes wrote:
I have successfully reverted the changeset.
Thanks
Now dreaming up a suitable diplomatic explanation for the new mapper.
I usually use something along the lines of
hello-and-welcome-and-by-the-way-something-appears-to-have-gone-wrong,
but in this case it's more of a
I also spotted a similar earlier problematic edit by the same user,
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/14534753 which I have also
reverted.
Although got the number wrong in my comment, sorry.
I think the first suggestion will be not to change so much in one go.
Phil (trigpoint)
On 06/01/2013 22:05, Lester Caine wrote:
SomeoneElse wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/199683324/history
If you look at it in P1 it's an obvious untagged doodle.
Not having P1 running, cross checking other peoples changes can be a
little difficult :( View of history is an area
On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 1/4/13 1:31 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Interesting—how would you characterize bad roads? One characteristic of
crappy TIGER data is road wiggliness, is that what you mean?
the tiger 2010/11/12 data is much better
On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:33 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 1/4/13 1:31 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
Interesting—how would you characterize bad roads? One characteristic
of crappy TIGER data is road wiggliness,
On 1/6/2013 7:30 AM, Alex Barth wrote:
This could be achieved e. g. by overlaying a light, opaque OSM highway layer
with a contrasting TIGER layer, only exposing TIGER 12 geometry where it
differs from OSM.
I like the idea of a TIGER 07 vs 12 comparison only being used as a
trigger. If
On 1/6/2013 11:37 AM, Mike N wrote:
I like the idea of a TIGER 07 vs 12 comparison only being used as a
trigger. If you compare TIGER 12 vs OSM, it will highlight all the
TIGER 07 artifact roads that were removed because they were in error or
no longer exist, but are still often in TIGER 12
Thanks Steve!
I think that would be possible, yeah. I already use object density as one of
the inputs here, and could use it to tweak the greens somewhat. The colors need
a second pass.
-mike.
On Jan 4, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Steve Coast wrote:
Mike
Nice.
Could you use relative object
101 - 121 di 121 matches
Mail list logo
