Re: [Talk-GB] Backwards Areas

2012-02-15 Per discussione Peter Reed
Graham, I don't think this is anything to do with your edit. About the same time as you edited Finchale, somebody accidentally added building=yes to the admin-area relation for North-East England, so the whole region turned into a building. It was fixed fairly quickly, and I think it has

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway rendering on OpenCycleMap

2011-04-22 Per discussione Peter Reed
Here is an alternative view of the National Byway as a KML overlay on OSM Cycle Map. http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/osmembed.html?kml=http://www.reedhome.o rg.uk/Documents/KML/natbyway.kml http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/osmembed.html?kml=http://www.reedhome.

Re: [Talk-GB] National Byway rendering on OpenCycleMap

2011-04-22 Per discussione Peter Reed
It might be easier using this link - - http://tinyurl.com/3oondxj Here is an alternative view of the National Byway as a KML overlay on OSM Cycle Map. http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/osmembed.html?kml=http://www.reedhome.o rg.uk/Documents/KML/natbyway.kml

[Talk-GB] Tagging gates on cycle path

2010-07-20 Per discussione Peter Reed
Near to Littlewick Green there is an off-road section of Sustrans National Route NCN4 which has series of gates across it. They are plotted as nodes on the cycle path, tagged as barrier=gate. The map is here - http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.5088

Re: [Talk-GB] West Mids Ward Boundaries

2010-04-07 Per discussione Peter Reed
When thinking about maintaining boundary imports, there is a further complication in that many boundaries follow other features - that are already mapped with varying degrees of precision. I can see a case for handling boundaries differently since the OS boundary data is definitive - in the

[Talk-GB] OSM highway coverage reworked using OS boundaries

2010-04-05 Per discussione Peter Reed
There is more sophisticated analysis of OSM coverage using OS vector data (http://povesham.wordpress.com/2010/04/04/openstreetmap-completeness-evaluat ion-march-2010/ ), but for what it's worth, I have produced another simple comparison between DfT statistics and the length of roads plotted on

Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey Gazetteer

2010-04-02 Per discussione Peter Reed
tricky with the abbreviations. Graham. On 1 April 2010 23:16, Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote: A lot more farms are there as . Fm It can't be that all farms are listed as running the query only reveals 372 points with farm in the title. Probably not enough to get too excited

Re: [Talk-GB] Ordnance Survey Gazetteer

2010-04-01 Per discussione Peter Reed
A lot more farms are there as . Fm It can't be that all farms are listed as running the query only reveals 372 points with farm in the title. Probably not enough to get too excited about, maybe just deal with them manually? ___ Talk-GB

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage

2010-03-30 Per discussione Peter Reed
I've now updated the coverage spreadsheet and map for Scotland, the rest of Wales and Northern Ireland. http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverMar2010.png http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverMar2010.csv It's the first time I've tried to add N. Ireland. I can't find

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage

2010-03-29 Per discussione Peter Reed
It's been three months since I last tried to measure road lengths on OSM against the Department for Transport statistics, and I thought there might be some interest in how things are progressing. At the moment this has only been updated where I already have decent admin boundaries from OSM.

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM Coverage

2010-03-29 Per discussione Peter Reed
Apologies for bad link - it should now work OK. http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverMar2010.csv ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb

Re: [Talk-GB] OSM coverage

2010-03-29 Per discussione Peter Reed
thought of it as being a significant enough place to have a Trunk road, although it does have green signs. Have you merged trunk and primary? Regards Graham. On 29 March 2010 17:57, Peter Reed peter.r...@aligre.co.uk wrote: It's been three months since I last tried to measure road

Re: [Talk-GB] Relations

2010-03-01 Per discussione Peter Reed
Bob, Adding boundaries really isn't all that difficult. Like most of these things it's easy to get hung up on some of the details beforehand, but it works out that it's fairly straightforward in practice. You seem to have understood the main points already. For boundaries you will

[Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Per discussione Peter Reed
As the weather improves we are all going to be out and about tracing roads for OSM. So there are various discussions, and work under way to help find, prioritise and then fill the most important gaps in the map. Larger towns and bigger areas that need attention are fairly well known, but

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Per discussione Peter Reed
Thanks for the interest. I haven't tried to collect parish boundaries yet, but it's an obvious step forward. The first thing is to say that I wouldn't want a load of effort going into supporting measuring stuff that is better spent mapping real stuff. So I wouldn't want to encourage

Re: [Talk-GB] Looking for places to map?

2010-02-23 Per discussione Peter Reed
Steve, It needn't be parishes. For population data it looks as though I can get down to ward level with up-to-date numbers from ONS. http://www.statistics.gov.uk/statbase/Product.asp?vlnk=13893 Looking at the ONS lists there are about 9,000 wards in England (and about 10,000 parishes). It's

[Talk-GB] Road density in Naptan pay scale areas

2010-02-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
It occurred to me that the Pay scale areas that arrived with the OSM Naptan import should be fairly thickly populated areas, so those with a relatively low road density would highlight places where there were roads missing from the map, and hence help to prioritise attention on plugging the gaps.

Re: [Talk-GB] Road density in Naptan pay scale areas

2010-02-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
work, and (b) there's a chance that it might spark a better idea. Peter Reed wrote: It occurred to me that the Pay scale areas that arrived with the OSM Naptan import should be fairly thickly populated areas, so those with a relatively low road density would highlight places where there were

Re: [Talk-GB] Road density in Naptan pay scale areas

2010-02-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
Thanks to Jonathan too. I can certainly update this occasionally if that would be useful. As it stands, comparisons between different areas are influenced too much by how widely the area is drawn, so Edinburgh for example (which in reality is very thoroughly mapped) looks as though it is

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage

2010-01-10 Per discussione Peter Reed
Thanks to both Andrew (wynndale) and Guy Colling for their comments on the analysis of OSM coverage. There has certainly been a noticeable improvement to Cornwall, and I am glad that I could help to highlight it. On the situation in Ireland, I am only transferring GB content to my database at

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage by local authority

2010-01-02 Per discussione Peter Reed
A few months ago I compared the length of roads on the OSM database against the figures quoted by the Department for transport, and posted the results here. I've now updated the figures using the OSM database extract at the end of 2009. The resulting map is here -

[Talk-GB] Motorway links

2009-08-27 Per discussione Peter Reed
I've heard back from the Department for Transport on how they measure motorway slip roads for their road length statistics, and it seems that they don't. Assuming that motorway link in OSM roughly corresponds to the slip roads that DfT are omitting, that would explain why the length of

Re: [Talk-GB] Coverage figures for Scotland and Wales

2009-08-22 Per discussione Peter Reed
We've had a dicky broadband connection for the 24 hours or so, but it seems to be OK now, so I've been able to upload the detailed coverage figures for Scotland and Wales here - http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/SWcoverage.csv ___ Talk-GB mailing

[Talk-GB] Coverage figures for Scotland and Wales

2009-08-21 Per discussione Peter Reed
Name |Coverage ---+ --- Isle of Anglesey | 124% Gwynedd

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage in Scotland and Wales

2009-08-20 Per discussione Peter Reed
I have done some preliminary measures of OSM coverage for Scotland and Wales based on using NUTS-3 regional boundaries as common ground to compare DfT figures for the length of roads in a local authority against the length of roads in OSM. NUTS-3 is the basis for EU regional statistics, and

[Talk-GB] OSM Coverage in Scotland and Wales

2009-08-20 Per discussione Peter Reed
I mean to add this to my previous message - and hit the button too quickly. The shapefiles that I used for boundaries of the NUTS regions are here - http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/gisco/popups/references/ Administrative%20units%20and%20Statistical%20units1

[Talk-GB] OSM coverage in Kodachrome

2009-08-20 Per discussione Peter Reed
It will be perfectly obvious to all that I am no expert at this, but there is another version of the OSM UK coverage map here http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverColour.png with brighter colours. I've still faded the regions that use NUTS data slightly to try and distinguish them from

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage again

2009-08-18 Per discussione Peter Reed
I've uncovered and fixed a few errors in my previous estimates of the % of UK roads included on OSM. I discovered a few days ago that there were a few areas where different boundaries overlapped, with the result that I was double counting some roads in more than one local authority. The

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Per discussione Peter Reed
I have now uploaded a summary of the figures for the UK coverage estimates as a CSV file here - http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCoverage.csv Several people have expressed an interest in seeing the proportion of named roads by local authority area. Those figures are included in the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-08-11 Per discussione Peter Reed
Interesting point from Paul (southglos) about slip roads. I've just worked the numbers slightly differently and he seems to be right. Adding up the total length of motorways in England according to DfT it comes to 6,021km. My total from OSM for England = 6,962km On face value we have

[Talk-GB] Progress on estimating coverage

2009-08-10 Per discussione Peter Reed
I've just posted an updated map of UK coverage at http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCover.png There are a number of significant changes in this version: a) As I half suspected, there was an error in the way I was handling map projections in the previous version. This resulted

Re: [Talk-GB] Progress on estimating coverage

2009-08-10 Per discussione Peter Reed
FWIW I've uncovered the problem with estimating coverage of Buckinghamshire. I was counting Milton Keynes twice. Like you do. To fix it takes a few hours processing, and I mucked up on my first attempt. I realise the tension is almost unbearable, but I'll get there eventually.

Re: [Talk-GB] Progress on estimating coverage

2009-08-10 Per discussione Peter Reed
I have now fixed the problem I was having with measuring the length of roads in Buckinghamshire, and I have uploaded a new map of UK road coverage here - http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/OSMCover.png FWIW here is a close up view of London as well -

[Talk-GB] Duplicate relations on Ways

2009-08-07 Per discussione Peter Reed
I've been trying to tidy up some admin boundaries, using Relation Analyzer to find gaps. As far as I can tell all the upper tier authorities (non-districts) in England are there now, and form complete polygons. For a while I was stumped by what seemed to be some gaps around Nottingham. It turned

[Talk-GB] Progress on estimating UK coverage

2009-07-27 Per discussione Peter Reed
Last week I posted a note about my efforts to compare actual road lengths (or at least Department for Transport statistics) against the lengths of road that are now in the map for each local authority area in England. This is a quick follow-up on the discussion that resulted, and an update

[Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
There have been a number of attempts to estimate the level of UK coverage, of varying levels of sophistication, but I've not seen any that compare the length of roads mapped against actual road lengths. The Department for Transport publishes statistics on actual road lengths by local

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
On the problems with Hampshire - my only related experience is that I had problems with POSTGIS unable to process a number of admin boundaries, because they are plotted with loops in the boundary. I.e. the boundary crosses over itself. This mostly happened where the coast had been added to the

Re: [Talk-GB] Estimating coverage

2009-07-19 Per discussione Peter Reed
FWIW I've now updated http://www.reedhome.org.uk/Documents/LGboundaries.csv to include a list of local authorities in Scotland, Wales and N. Ireland. ___ Talk-GB mailing list Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org