Re: [Talk-us] Maine leaf-off imagery?

2019-10-05 Per discussione Michael Patrick
> I see some tutorials for extracting buildings, but I'm interested in traces of former land-use - finding artificial linear ground features under the foliage. I use CloudCompare ( open source ) to good result for lidar point clouds. ( https://www.danielgm.net/cc/ ) ...See

Re: [OSM-ja] 太陽電池のマッピングについて

2019-10-05 Per discussione Talk-ja 経由
ありがとうございました. 下記のように描いてみました. 一応,location, orientaion, start_dateをわかる範囲で書き込みました. https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/75331007 2019年10月5日(土) 19:05 ribbon : > On Sat, Oct 05, 2019 at 06:46:18PM +0900, Taro MORI wrote: > > はじめまして,mori taroと申します. > > 大学で室内環境とかエネルギー関係の研究をしています. > > >

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

2019-10-05 Per discussione Warin
Please read https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle It applies to the world. There is nothing Australian specific that I can see in your thoughts .. Nor can I see why ACT should be different from the rest of the world in how it maps bicycle infrastructure.

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

2019-10-05 Per discussione Warin
On 06/10/19 09:47, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote: I apologise for the tone of the first post yesterday. I was a bit unwell. *** # The ATG proposed changes for paths in the ACT I have decided to write this as a proposal of changes to the ATG in the ACT (if any) and consideration of the

Re: [talk-au] Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways (Was: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrew Davidson
On 6/10/19 8:12 am, David Wales wrote: Why did he remove the bridge tag? I think he doesn't understand how to tag man_made=bridge because he took the bridge tags off the other ways as well: http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=69845883 ___

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

2019-10-05 Per discussione Herbert.Remi via Talk-au
I apologise for the tone of the first post yesterday. I was a bit unwell. *** # The ATG proposed changes for paths in the ACT I have decided to write this as a proposal of changes to the ATG in the ACT (if any) and consideration of the consequences. For the paths found in the ACT, I will

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione David Wales
So long as access and gates are correctly tagged, I can't see a reason not to map private roads. On 5 October 2019 8:34:59 pm AEST, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > > >5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: >> The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interiorprivate >roads in

Re: [talk-au] Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways (Was: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

2019-10-05 Per discussione David Wales
Why did he remove the bridge tag? On 5 October 2019 8:16:35 pm AEST, Andrew Davidson wrote: >On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote: >> >> >https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770 > >> > >Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 5. Oct 2019, at 15:01, Volker Schmidt wrote: > > Questo mi ricorda che volevo porvi una domanda pertinente ma più generica: > esiste un metodo per indicare che certi servizi sono presenti in un posto, > senza sapere dove: ufficio postale, alimentare, albergo, bar,

Re: [Talk-us] Opinions on micro parks

2019-10-05 Per discussione Mateusz Konieczny
1 Oct 2019, 16:26 by frede...@remote.org: > > Case 1: > > http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/case1.png > > Two small coastal areas that look a bit like rock outcroppings. > It is hard to imagine to me situation where it would be leisure=park. > "zone=PR-PP" which was then interpreted as

Re: [Talk-it] Vorrei che qualcuno controllasse le mie modifiche

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrea Albani
Il processo di "ingaggio" con l'utente che abilita il flag è descritto bene qui [1]. Per vedere i changeset di questo tipo in Italia puoi usare [2] modificando eventualmente i filtri come più ti aggrada. [1] https://neis-one.org/2017/09/review-requests-osm/ [2]

Re: [Talk-us] Townships, Counties, Great Lakes

2019-10-05 Per discussione Clifford Snow
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 10:18 AM Max Erickson wrote: > I've recently been working on adding administrative boundaries for > townships in Michigan (old USGS paper maps show the boundaries, I'm tracing > those). Previously I've concluded that counties in Michigan don't really > extend into the

[Talk-us] Townships, Counties, Great Lakes

2019-10-05 Per discussione Max Erickson
I've recently been working on adding administrative boundaries for townships in Michigan (old USGS paper maps show the boundaries, I'm tracing those). Previously I've concluded that counties in Michigan don't really extend into the Great Lakes. The sheriff has jurisdiction on the water (extending

[Talk-it] Vorrei che qualcuno controllasse le mie modifiche

2019-10-05 Per discussione canfe
Prima si salvare su ID compare un quadratino di spunta con scritto. "Vorrei che qualcuno controllasse le mie modifiche." posizionata appena sopra il bottone "annulla". La stessa cosa con JOSM compare: "vorrei che qualcuno controllasse queste modifiche" quando si sta per fare l'upload (posizionato

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Géocodage : différence entre les API

2019-10-05 Per discussione mga_geo via Talk-fr
Merci pour la réponse Jean-Yvon Je ne connaissais pas la version "all" et je n'ai plus d'échec. On trouve où la document sur cette API ? Marc -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/France-f5380434.html ___ Talk-fr mailing list

[Talk-it] Pagina welcome.openstreetmap.it irraggiungibile

2019-10-05 Per discussione Marcello
Salve, la pagina per i messaggi di benvenuto non è più raggiungibile, sia usando http che https rimanda alla pagina https://cortesi.com, dove Simone ci fa un bel sorriso. L'avevo usata domenica scorsa e ancora era funzionante. -- Ciao Marcello ___

Re: [Talk-bo] Mapilleada el 20 Octubre en Bolivia

2019-10-05 Per discussione Juan Jose Iglesias
En Mapillary la ruta Tiquipaya-Plazuela Tarija para ir a votar en Bicicleta -Original Message- From: Marco Antonio [mailto:marcoantoniofr...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, October 4, 2019 5:13 PM To: OSM Bolivia Subject: [Talk-bo] Mapilleada el 20 Octubre en Bolivia Hola, Aprovechando el

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Volker Schmidt
Questo mi ricorda che volevo porvi una domanda pertinente ma più generica: esiste un metodo per indicare che certi servizi sono presenti in un posto, senza sapere dove: ufficio postale, alimentare, albergo, bar, altro. On Sat, 5 Oct 2019, 14:27 Martin Koppenhoefer, wrote: > > > sent from a

Re: [OSM-talk] HOT Microgrants 2020 - Call for Applications

2019-10-05 Per discussione Mateusz Konieczny
2 Oct 2019, 11:30 by rebecca.fi...@hotosm.org: > The form to pitch your project is relatively simple > Note that pitch form is limited to public YouTube videos. Solely in places where YouTube is unavailable it is possible to send a private proposal, also limited to a video form. It is going to

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione Mateusz Konieczny
5 Oct 2019, 12:53 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > As I see it the options are; > > * Do not map. > * Map the entry only. > * Map it all. > There are some objects where not mapping them and removal of mapped objects is justifiable[1]. Maybe even hiding old entries in history. It is not one of

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Martin Koppenhoefer
sent from a phone > On 5. Oct 2019, at 11:37, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > Se non c'è rilevamento in loco e l'unica informazione che si ha è mediata da > un comunicato stampa che afferma che un postamat è stato installato in un > comune (e non si sa dove), allora non si inserisce niente.

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Alecs via Talk-it
Andrea Musuruane wrote > Sono decisamente contrario a questo modo di procedere. > > Se non c'è rilevamento in loco e l'unica informazione che si ha è mediata > da un comunicato stampa che afferma che un postamat è stato installato in > un comune (e non si sa dove), allora non si inserisce niente.

[OSM-talk-fr] lotissements

2019-10-05 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
J'aimerais avoir une clé pour les lotissements : les bornes sont claires (et je n'utilise pas deux landuse nommés pour deux lotissements : ça fait apparaître des traits qui n'ont pas lieu d'être entre les deux). city_block me semble plus urbain et correspond à un plan à l'américaine. En Bretagne

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Lieux-dits Fantoir surfaciques

2019-10-05 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
Le 03/10/2019 à 23:13, Vincent de Château-Thierry - osm.v...@free.fr a écrit : Je n'ai pas l'impression qu'on gagnera en pertinence en important des agrégats de parcelles nommées issues du cadastre (notre seule source surfacique) tant c'est un contenu partiel (on a bien plus de lieux-dits sur

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione Warin
On 05/10/19 20:34, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: 5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interior private roads in detail" as not mapping them at all Are they not mapping them or also (incorrectly) deleting what others mapped? I

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione Mateusz Konieczny
5 Oct 2019, 01:44 by 61sundow...@gmail.com: > The problem here is that some raise the "not map the interiorprivate roads in > detail" as not mapping them at all > Are they not mapping them or also  (incorrectly) deleting what others  mapped?___

Re: [talk-au] Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways (Was: Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law)

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrew Davidson
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/1698#issuecomment-134914770 Thanks for that. I hadn't realised there was yet another prioblem with using the path tag: highway=path bicycle=designated is currently rendered differently to

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Géocodage : différence entre les API

2019-10-05 Per discussione osm . sanspourriel
Ça vaudrait le coup de télécharger les données BAN sur le 35. Sur all (http://*all*.addok.xyz/search/?q=6+rue+Chateaurenault=35238 ) tu vois que la bonne info vient de la BANO pas de la BAN. Jean-Yvon Le 05/10/2019 à 09:08, Marc

[talk-au] On the origin of path tags (Was: Undiscussed edits to Australian Tagging Guidelines on tagging footpaths/cycleways)

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrew Davidson
On 4/10/19 10:53 pm, Andy Townsend wrote: In places like Germany, however, dedicated infrastructure is more common, and there are usually signs telling you exactly what you are allowed to do.  As I understand it (and this was before my time, so this is largely hearsay) "cycleway" and

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Francesco Ansanelli
Il sab 5 ott 2019, 11:19 Lorenzo Rolla ha scritto: > @Andrea: chiaro il concetto di inserire "ictu oculi"; il problema nasce > dal fatto che questi comunelli hanno poco più di cento, trecento abitanti e > quindi difficilmente saranno oggetto di una rilievo specifico e quindi la > presenza della

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
Sono decisamente contrario a questo modo di procedere. Se non c'è rilevamento in loco e l'unica informazione che si ha è mediata da un comunicato stampa che afferma che un postamat è stato installato in un comune (e non si sa dove), allora non si inserisce niente. Questo a prescindere dalla

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Lorenzo Rolla
@Andrea: chiaro il concetto di inserire "ictu oculi"; il problema nasce dal fatto che questi comunelli hanno poco più di cento, trecento abitanti e quindi difficilmente saranno oggetto di una rilievo specifico e quindi la presenza della macchinetta sarà un "segreto" circoscritto alla popolazione

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione Nemanja Bračko
Even I'm not from AU, I would recommend adding private roads, especially because we had a flood situation couple of years ago. In that time we were mapping buildings (for rescue teams) and all kind of trails or roads just to help people to escape flooded area. We didn't pay attention if it is

[talk-cz] pozvánka na další brněnský mapathon pro Lékaře bez hranic

2019-10-05 Per discussione r.stampach
Zdravím, jsem zaměstnancem Geografického ústavu Přírodovědecké fakulty Masarykovy univerzity. V Brně se pravidelně uskutečňují brněnské Missing Maps mapathony pro organizaci Lékařů bez hranic, kde se vytváří data OpenStreetMap pro krizové části světa, které dosud nejsou dobře zmapované. Tato

Re: [Talk-GB] Import UK postcode data?

2019-10-05 Per discussione ndrw6
On 04/10/2019 20:28, Frederik Ramm wrote: The reality is that people expect postcodes to be a functional search term on online mapping, at least in the UK, You *are* ware that UK post codes are fully findable on the OSM website and any site that runs the Nominatim geocoder? It must have been

Re: [Talk-GB] Import UK postcode data?

2019-10-05 Per discussione ndrw6
On 04/10/2019 15:41, Richard Fairhurst wrote: 2. However... just blindly importing them seems to be a real missed opportunity. If you give me a nice interface with centroids for Charlbury, I will have a go at mapping them to actual, useful polygons, based on my knowledge of the street layout and

Re: [talk-au] Discussion D: mapping ACT for cyclists – complying with ACT law

2019-10-05 Per discussione Warin
On 05/10/19 10:03, Herbert.Remi via Talk-au wrote: # Principle of tagging 1. Tagging should be consistent with the laws of the jurisdiction 2. Tagging should not be code but be explicit 3. Tagging should be useful 4. Tagging should be intuitive 5. Tagging should be easy (regional presets) I

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Francesco Ansanelli
Buongiorno Lorenzo, se sono all'interno (o anche all'esterno) di un ufficio postale (amenity=post_office), puoi aggiungere a quest'ultimo il tag atm=yes. Suggerisco anche di indicare operator="Poste Italiane" se non è presente. Saluti, Francesco Il sab 5 ott 2019, 08:45 Lorenzo Rolla ha

Re: [Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Andrea Musuruane
Ciao, Forse è il caso di ricordare che, import a parte, in OpenStreetMap si inserisce quello che si rileva sul posto. Quindi non si inseriscono informazioni prese da un comunicato stampa che, tra le altre cose, viene giudicato impreciso. Semmai si usa lo stesso comunicato per fare delle

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione Mateusz Konieczny
5 Oct 2019, 02:43 by mapp...@consebt.de: > Thinking of a delivery vehicle I am even considering if access=permissive > would be appropriate. > access=permissive is used in cases where everyone may enter, but owner may revoke access at any time ___

[OSM-talk-fr] Géocodage : différence entre les API

2019-10-05 Per discussione Marc Gauthier via Talk-fr
Bonjour à tous, J'ai quelques échecs de géocodage sur l'ancienne API, par exemple https://api-adresse.data.gouv.fr/search/?q=6+rue+Chateaurenault=35238 La requête http://demo.addok.xyz/search/?q=6+rue+Chateaurenault=35238 fournit la bonne localisation. Quelle est l'origine de la

[Talk-it] inserimento postamat piccoli comuni

2019-10-05 Per discussione Lorenzo Rolla
Buongiorno a tutti. Desidero sottoporre alla vostra attenzione di tutti questa criticità (derubricabile in corbelleria...). Poste Italiane sta installando numerosi postamat in paesini piccolissimi: lodevolissima iniziativa, ma circoscritta a un comunicato stampa aziendale e quindi sconosciuta ai

Re: [talk-au] Mapping 'private roads'

2019-10-05 Per discussione forster
Maybe add the tag norender=yes when the owner or responsible body requests that a feature not be rendered. This might apply to private property, illegal tracks on public land , military bases and more. It would be up to individual map renderers whether they would respect the norender