I deleted most of the of suspicious POIs in question, on changesets where I
also made major edits to improve building and road alignment with existing
imagery, adding/remapping municipal and barangay boundaries to include
barangays mapped as part of the Taal Volcano eruption response. I think
We may be fine adopting this new scheme. So far, the last revision to the
classification scheme is in 2015, but there hasn't been any discussion in
the mailing list, and this could be the only major revision that has been
discussed since we wrote the guidelines back in ~2007.
--TagaSanPedroAko
Agreed!
Best,
Nick
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 18:48 Eugene Alvin Villar, wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> I personally think this is OK. But the question will be on the ordering.
> My preference is to put general channels ahead of thematic (e.g.,
> humanitarian) channels. The reasoning is that a random mapper
Hi Nick,
I personally think this is OK. But the question will be on the ordering. My
preference is to put general channels ahead of thematic (e.g.,
humanitarian) channels. The reasoning is that a random mapper editing in iD
would be more interested to learn more about the broader mapping
Hi folks,
Can we also add the HOT Ph Facebook page and Telegram chat on the list?
Thanks!
Best,
Nick
On Thu, 30 Jan 2020, 04:57 Eugene Alvin Villar, wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> If you have ever edited in OSM using the iD editor, you may have noticed a
> list of communication channels on the left
