On 18 Sep 2009, at 18:29, Peter Miller wrote:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 18:05, Shaun McDonald wrote:
On 18 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Peter Miller wrote:
We then have enough information for people to play trains!
If the station has multiple levels then each element should have a
layer tag and we will
2009/9/18 Peter Miller
> > I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the
> > front of the train stops.
> > Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there
> > was too poor also.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> How about the following:-
>
> A railway=stop node f
2009/9/18 Thomas Wood :
> 2009/9/18 Peter Miller :
>>
>> On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Thomas Wood wrote:
>>
>>> I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the
>>> front of the train stops.
>>> Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there
>>> was too poor
2009/9/18 Peter Miller :
>
> On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Thomas Wood wrote:
>
>> I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the
>> front of the train stops.
>> Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there
>> was too poor also.
>
> Sounds good.
>
> How a
On 18 Sep 2009, at 18:05, Shaun McDonald wrote:
>
> On 18 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Peter Miller wrote:
>
>> We then have enough information for people to play trains!
>>
>> If the station has multiple levels then each element should have a
>> layer tag and we will need to consider how one manages a si
On 18 Sep 2009, at 17:42, Peter Miller wrote:
We then have enough information for people to play trains!
If the station has multiple levels then each element should have a
layer tag and we will need to consider how one manages a single level
(concourse) where one side has a level entrance to t
On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:40, Thomas Wood wrote:
> I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the
> front of the train stops.
> Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there
> was too poor also.
Sounds good.
How about the following:-
A railway=stop no
2009/9/18 Ed Loach :
> Peter asked:
>
>> Anyone got a Zoom Layer beyond level 19 so I can see what I'm
>> doing
>> and pace the station out..
>
> JOSM. I think you can just keep zooming in. It also displays the
> length (and bearing) of the current way you're adding. Useful in
> some situations
Peter asked:
> Anyone got a Zoom Layer beyond level 19 so I can see what I'm
> doing
> and pace the station out..
JOSM. I think you can just keep zooming in. It also displays the
length (and bearing) of the current way you're adding. Useful in
some situations.
Ed
_
> Maybe we should have door marks, ie Rather than say the train stops
> here say where the doors should be; I've seen these marked on the
> platform in some parts of the world and parts of the Tube have
> automatic doors fixed to the platform!
The in-tube parts of the Jubilee line extension, I dou
I've been pondering micro-mapping the carstop signs to mark where the
front of the train stops.
Indeed, I tried to collect this info for Wimbledon, but the GPS there
was too poor also.
2009/9/18 Peter Childs :
> 2009/9/18 Frankie Roberto :
>>
>> 2009/9/18 Peter Childs
>>
>>> Its very difficult as
2009/9/18 Frankie Roberto :
>
> 2009/9/18 Peter Childs
>
>> Its very difficult as London Bridge is based on about 6 layers with
>> random escalators, lifts and ramps connecting it up.
>>
>> I'm thinking the building should only cover parts with a roof on and
>> hence really needs cutting up.
>
On 18 Sep 2009, at 15:13, Frankie Roberto wrote:
Then, make a node on each track to represent where the trains stop.
There can be more than one of these if there are a few stopping
points (eg platform 1a, 1b). Tag this railway=stop.
All of these stopping points, plus the platforms, pl
2009/9/18 Peter Childs
Its very difficult as London Bridge is based on about 6 layers with
> random escalators, lifts and ramps connecting it up.
>
> I'm thinking the building should only cover parts with a roof on and
> hence really needs cutting up.
>
Yeah, agree.
> Is there a marker I c
I've been trying to sort out the Map of London Bridge Station.
Its very difficult as London Bridge is based on about 6 layers with
random escalators, lifts and ramps connecting it up.
I'm thinking the building should only cover parts with a roof on and
hence really needs cutting up.
Is there
Just tag is per the normal OSM methods. physically_present=yes means
nothing on a non-naptan stop, since its assumed to exist by merely
being in the database.
2009/9/18 Ed Loach :
> Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan?
> I verified 2 last night when out wa
2009/9/18 Ed Loach :
> Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan?
> I verified 2 last night when out walking that I could see on the Mapnik layer
> only to find when I got back that they were two that I added in the dim and
> distant past (last December), so I'
Was there an agreement reached on how to tag bus stops that aren't in naptan? I
verified 2 last night when out walking that I could see on the Mapnik layer
only to find when I got back that they were two that I added in the dim and
distant past (last December), so I'd verified my own additions.
18 matches
Mail list logo
