On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Greg Morgan dr.kludge...@gmail.com wrote:
I use residential for 0 to 25 mph residential roads. That tag seems
obvious.
I use tertiary for 30 to 35 mph roads. I see most of these types of roads
as connecting residential subdivisions. These roads tend to have
I think you're making the right call, James.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:33 PM, James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
So, nobody else has a comment on how the repair work should be done?
Last chance before I respond back to the DWG e-mail (and as of right now,
will be recommending just
If a search is done for Fortuna, CA in OSM, two different entities
show up at the top, for the same thing. One is from a TIGER import, one
is from a GNIS import. One is a node the other one is for the boundaries
of the place. I assume a place doesn't need to have both a node and a
way. If I
I generally copy the tags to the boundary (in JOSM copy the node, then
paste tags into the way).
The tiger and gnis tags do not overlap. The GNISID is a particularly
useful tag to preserve.
Town vs. City is a matter of opinion. You can visit the municipal website
and use whatever term they use
On 1/29/14 2:14 PM, Sebastian Arcus wrote:
If a search is done for Fortuna, CA in OSM, two different entities
show up at the top, for the same thing. One is from a TIGER import,
one is from a GNIS import. One is a node the other one is for the
boundaries of the place. I assume a place doesn't
On 1/29/14 2:23 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I generally copy the tags to the boundary (in JOSM copy the node, then
paste tags into the way).
The tiger and gnis tags do not overlap. The GNISID is a particularly
useful tag to preserve.
gnisid may be the only one worth saving, most of the GNIS:
Note that if you delete the node, the city name will no longer be rendered
on osm.org or Mapquest Open. Not sure about other renderings but I'm
guessing a lot of them do the same thing. Another way of fixing the
nominatim problem is to create a boundary relation for the city. Move the
tags from
From: Richard Welty [mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2014 11:32 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging a GNIS node with a TIGER way - for a town
On top of it, one of them claims Fortuna, CA is a town, while the
other claims it is a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
terms like town and city generally have specific legal meanings in
the US, and those meanings vary from state to state. this is one where
in all likelyhood you should leave it to a local mapper, or consult with
a
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
terms like town and city generally have specific legal meanings in
the US, and those meanings vary from state to state. this is one where
in all likelyhood you should leave it to a local mapper, or consult with
a
On 1/29/14 4:48 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
terms like town and city generally have specific legal meanings in
the US, and those meanings vary from state to state. this is one where
in all likelyhood you should leave
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
I've been asked to submit a proposal to teach iD at an upcoming conference.
Rather than reinvent the wheel, I'm hoping to steal/borrow
syllabus/proposal for teaching iD.
If you know of one, please point me in the right direction. If you do, I
promise to name an upcoming changeset after you.
--
Am 29/gen/2014 um 20:14 schrieb Sebastian Arcus s.ar...@open-t.co.uk:
I assume a place doesn't need to have both a node and a way.
Actually having both a node and a polygon is the best. If you delete either
you'll loose information.
cheers,
Martin
14 matches
Mail list logo