On 12/27/12 2:46 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
This is about shawnee county, not riley. I am working on getting a
written confirmation, until then I will not import any more data, just
continue to clean up what I have imported.
thank you.
we really do need to take this much care whenever we bring in
Given the extreme concern many people have about protecting the integrity
of OSM data, why not just get a brief email from Riley County GIS stating
just that? If there's no explicit statement clarifying this on the web, an
email from a county official would be better safe than sorry, no?
On Thu, D
I dont think that zipcodes and housenumbers count as copyrightable in usa.
I am not importing the entire database, and I am not copying the shapes
there. Also I am matching them up with bing, I really have doubts about the
data being protected in any meaningful way. I will do more research with
the
To be clear, you do *not* have a license for this data but are relying on
fair use and your opinion of what is copyrighted?
Also, are you relying on the fact that others havent gotten into trouble as
support for this import being legally okay?
From: Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@goog
Well we can remove the names of the lbcs codes, I left them for now because
it is very useful for editing. I am using them to search while editing etc.
Well the amount of data we are extracting is very very limited, I see this
as basic fair use and factual information. The county gis officer knows
You are proposing importing both the code *and* the description of the code.
Why both?
For that matter, why either at all? A user isnt going to know what to do
with it when editing the other tags.
I cant see a link to the license on the wiki. Could you please provide one.
A lack of a lic
Yes, I am going to be working on this.
We can remove the US and KS easily.
Not all is perfect, Some of the nodes dont have a house number.
That farm node you mentioned is an empty farmyard.
http://www.snco.us/Ap/R_prop/Listing.asp?PRCL_ID=0282701001001010 It does
not have a house number, but it do
Just saw some of this going in and decided to take a look.
Specifically this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2078174875
- I think there is pretty good consensus that we don't need addr:state
and addr:country tags
- The addr:street tag has odd capitalization
- The building=* tag typi
I have added the info to the wiki
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Kansas/Shawnee_County/Import
also the scripts are updated. I am been manually replacing the plot info
with just the building, so the only info being imported are the house
numbers and zip codes and the lbcs tags. Also for the n
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
wrote:
>
>
> Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike Dupont <
> jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com>:
>
> 3. **What tagging are you proposing?
>>
> addr:* and landuse
> the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags
> eg
> lbcs:activit
10 matches
Mail list logo