Given the extreme concern many people have about protecting the integrity
of OSM data, why not just get a brief email from Riley County GIS stating
just that? If there's no explicit statement clarifying this on the web, an
email from a county official would be better safe than sorry, no?
On Thu,
On 12/27/12 2:46 PM, Mike Dupont wrote:
This is about shawnee county, not riley. I am working on getting a
written confirmation, until then I will not import any more data, just
continue to clean up what I have imported.
thank you.
we really do need to take this much care whenever we bring in
Just saw some of this going in and decided to take a look.
Specifically this node:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/2078174875
- I think there is pretty good consensus that we don't need addr:state
and addr:country tags
- The addr:street tag has odd capitalization
- The building=* tag
Yes, I am going to be working on this.
We can remove the US and KS easily.
Not all is perfect, Some of the nodes dont have a house number.
That farm node you mentioned is an empty farmyard.
http://www.snco.us/Ap/R_prop/Listing.asp?PRCL_ID=0282701001001010 It does
not have a house number, but it
You are proposing importing both the code *and* the description of the code.
Why both?
For that matter, why either at all? A user isnt going to know what to do
with it when editing the other tags.
I cant see a link to the license on the wiki. Could you please provide one.
A lack of a
Well we can remove the names of the lbcs codes, I left them for now because
it is very useful for editing. I am using them to search while editing etc.
Well the amount of data we are extracting is very very limited, I see this
as basic fair use and factual information. The county gis officer
To be clear, you do *not* have a license for this data but are relying on
fair use and your opinion of what is copyrighted?
Also, are you relying on the fact that others havent gotten into trouble as
support for this import being legally okay?
From: Mike Dupont
I dont think that zipcodes and housenumbers count as copyrightable in usa.
I am not importing the entire database, and I am not copying the shapes
there. Also I am matching them up with bing, I really have doubts about the
data being protected in any meaningful way. I will do more research with
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Martin Koppenhöfer
dieterdre...@gmail.comwrote:
Am 15/dic/2012 um 22:39 schrieb Mike Dupont
jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com:
3. **What tagging are you proposing?
addr:* and landuse
the only additional tag are the four detailed landuse tags
eg
9 matches
Mail list logo
