Still feeling that cardinal directions only belong as roles in for child
relations in super-relations.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list so please bear with me.
The relation editor currently only parses 'forward' and
Martijn
I'm good with having a separate discussion of milepoints/*pointes
kilometriques, *sure. I'll probably wait a week or two until a consensus
emerges on posted directionality, as you suggest.
Peter
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Martijn van Exel m...@rtijn.org wrote:
Peter,
I think
Other examples of weird route designators include Arizona's Loop 101 and
Loop 202 freeways in Maricopa County (Greater Phoenix). They are state
highways, 100% freeways (probably), one around metro PHX and the other
around the East Valley (Tempe/Mesa etc.). Like James I think that the
route
We at Castle Rock Associates and our client Mn/DOT agree that I-35W is the
route designator (ref on the way in OSM).
Peter Davies
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:44:09
To: Saikrishna
I should add that in OSM, I-35W is written I 35W, without the dash. I-35
splits into I-35W and I-35E in MSP (MN) as well as in DFW (TX). Mn/DOT is the
Minnesota Dept of Transportation. Peter Davies
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: peter.dav...@crc-corp.com
Hi Florian,
It's more like a designation than a destination, so I think the
destination tag would not be very appropriate for this. An Interstate
has a cardinal direction, and when giving directions you would say for
example 'enter Interstate 80 west'.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:12 AM, Florian
Peter,
I think we should separate the discussion related to linear
referencing / mileposts from the cardinal direction discussion - these
are two different things really, to my mind. The notion of cardinal
direction is a relatively straightforward one, and that is already
cause for (cultural)
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:24 AM, SomeoneElse
li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk wrote:
For example, imagine I'm near 2 ways that are both part of the I-80[1]. For
simplicity let's assume that the way that I would take to get to eastbound
destinations actually goes in an eastbound direction at my
Martijn
I, too, await your clarification for KristenK, as I'm a little confused
too.
We need to keep in mind that positive and negative GIS Linear Reference
directions (which are handy as global solutions applying everywhere in the
US at least) beginning at milepoint 0.0, usually on the southern
When I typed The cost of reporting the whole route is usually
prohibitive. below I meant The cost of reposting the whole route is
usually prohibitive. By posting I mean signing.
Peter Davies, Castle Rock
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Peter Davies peter.dav...@crc-corp.comwrote:
Martijn
Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com wrote:
On Tue, November 26, 2013 1:57 pm, Ian Dees wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:30:25PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list so please bear with me.
The
On 11/27/13 2:46 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
You also have compass-point letters used to distinguish between
branches of the same route. For example, US 31 runs north/south. A
portion of it branches off as US 31W, which runs roughly parallel,
some miles westward of US 31, and eventually merges
The same applies for I-35 in the DFW area; I-35E runs through Dallas
while I-35W runs through Fort Worth.
Saikrishna Arcot
On Wed 27 Nov 2013 03:56:51 PM EST, Richard Welty wrote:
On 11/27/13 2:46 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
You also have compass-point letters used to distinguish between
However, with the split Interstates (I-35W/I-35E in both TX and MN
I-69E/I-69C/I-69W in TX) US Highways (and a few state highways), the letters
are part of the route number. So, they wouldn't have any effect on the role
part for relations. When given routing info, they'd act just like
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:30:25PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list so please bear with me.
The relation editor currently only parses 'forward' and 'backward'
roles when considering the visual
On Tue, November 26, 2013 1:57 pm, Ian Dees wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de wrote:
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:30:25PM -0700, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
I'm new to this list so please bear with me.
The relation editor currently only parses 'forward'
From: Florian Lohoff [mailto:f...@zz.de]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2013 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: [josm-dev] Relation editor support for north/south and
east/west similar to forward/backward
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Ian Dees wrote:
No, these aren't compass directions.
Yes, sorry for not being clearer. As Ian indicates, this is the
*signposted cardinal direction* of a numbered road route, which does
not change with the actual compass direction of the road. The guiding
principle for the United States is that the odd numbered Interstates
are north/south, and the
Martijn,
I want to make sure I understand what you're trying to convey to the
group. Are you saying that If a way has a member role value of east
then east will mean forward and then west (it's opposite) would mean
backward?
Example logic:
** If member role = east, node direction is eastbound
19 matches
Mail list logo
