My area here in Glendale Arizona and its surrounding area got a much needed
update from Microsoft when they updated bing imagery last summer. Don't
remember the month but i was really excited. I know they updated a lot of
the major cities in the U.S, sadly they didn't touch any small towns that i
k
Is there any information on when we might see more recent imagery? There’s been
a fair amount of infill development in my part of town, and I’d like to map
outlines and parking rather than just points or approximations. I checked the
available NAIP imagery for the area, and it seems to be of the
This seems to have some serious gaps in detail. For example, most of
Portland and most of Tulsa is considered as having the same level of detail
imagery available. Not so; I can barely make out centerlines and lane
lines on the highest level of detail for the Tulsa area, whereas in
Portland, I've
According to http://www.ncgicc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=135 and links
therein, they are doing 1/4 of the state per year on a rolling basis.
This year they photographed the eastern Piedmont and are currently
getting it ready for release, probably in early 2014. In 2014 they are
photographing norther
You can view this information in JOSM as well. If Bing is the only imagery
visible you can right click and choose "Show Tile Info"
Toby
On Dec 4, 2013 5:42 PM, "Martijn van Exel" wrote:
The HTTP response header of the tile image contains something like:
X-VE-TILEMETA-CaptureDatesRange:
1/1/2012
On 12/4/2013 9:07 PM, Kam, Kristen -(p) wrote:
James,
I located NAIP imagery for the state of North Carolina.
That prompted my recall of an open NC state-run offleaf imagery source.
It worked in JOSM back in 2010. I see that they have updated some
coastal imagery in 2012; I'm not sure ho
Unfortunately, in my area (Burlington VT), it seems like the 2008-era
high resolution images (zoom 20?) are no longer available, and only the
2010? era zoom 19 are there.
On the Bing website I can still see the higher resolution images, but
neither JOSM nor the Bing Imagery Analyzer is display
rom: James Mast [mailto:rickmastfa...@hotmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 5:08 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Bing imagery update
I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC. Especially
because of the building of the "missing link&q
On 12/4/13 8:07 PM, James Mast wrote:
> I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC.
> Especially because of the building of the "missing link" of I-485.
> And I can't forget to mention I-85 as well since it's being widened
> from 2 to 4 lanes going North from I-485. I so want
I just wish Bing would update the imagery around Charlotte, NC. Especially
because of the building of the "missing link" of I-485. And I can't forget to
mention I-85 as well since it's being widened from 2 to 4 lanes going North
from I-485. I so want to clean that major turbine interchange of
The HTTP response header of the tile image contains something like:
X-VE-TILEMETA-CaptureDatesRange:
1/1/2012-1/1/2012
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Martijn,
> Where do you get the date from? I suspect that it is encoded in the bing
> image tile. What are you using to gra
Martijn,
Where do you get the date from? I suspect that it is encoded in the bing
image tile. What are you using to grab the data?
Clifford
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
> here is the original version, which shows things in a slightly
> different way, for reference:
>
here is the original version, which shows things in a slightly
different way, for reference:
http://mvexel.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/#
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Elliott Plack wrote:
> Clifford, great share!
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Martijn van Exel
> wrote:
Clifford, great share!
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
> The site you are pointing to is actually a much improved fork of a
> much simpler thing I built a few years ago, so I can't take much
> credit for this :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Clifford Snow
> wrote:
The site you are pointing to is actually a much improved fork of a
much simpler thing I built a few years ago, so I can't take much
credit for this :)
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Clifford Snow wrote:
> Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap,
> http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.or
Whoa, nice work, Martijn! Thanks for calling it out, Clifford. This is
really useful.
-Steven
-- SEJ
-- twitter: @geomantic
-- skype: sejohnson8
There are two types of people in the world. Those that can extrapolate from
incomplete data.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Clifford Snow wrote:
>
Check out Bing Aerial Imagery Analyzer for OpenStreetMap,
http://ant.dev.openstreetmap.org/bingimageanalyzer/. Someone posted a link
about it on the Canadian talk list this morning. Another one of Martijn van
Exel great contributions to OSM.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Alexander Jones wrote:
Mike N wrote:
> In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this
> year; within the last month or so.
New imagery in Fresno, too. When you're remapping rail yards, it's a
lifesaver.
Alexander
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@open
In my part of SC, Bing imagery has updated! Seems to be from this
year; within the last month or so.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
kground and the new
imagery loaded! Yet with my "default" profile, it still only loading the "old"
imagery even with a clean image catch with nothing downloaded. Crazy.
--James
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:46:36 -0400
> From: nice...@att.net
> To: talk-us@ope
On 6/13/2012 2:09 PM, Mike N wrote:
It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to
different servers behind the load sharing server.
OK, I'm officially stumped. I have 2 instances of JOSM - one 'works',
and the other always shows the 'old imagery'. I removed all c
On 6/13/2012 12:13 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom
20:
It's also possible that they're rolling out the new stuff in stages to
different servers behind the load sharing server. So that might be why
some solutions work diffe
On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote:
I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM is
still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer
imagery.
Perhaps you're zoomed in too far. PL2 also gives the old imagery at zoom
20:
http://www.openstreetmap.
> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:46:37 -0400
> From: nice...@att.net
> To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Bing Imagery link changed for JOSM?
>
> On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote:
> > I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis a
On 6/13/2012 5:22 AM, James Mast wrote:
I've also noticed this in the happening in St. Louis along I-64. JOSM
is still loading the old imagery, while Potlatch 2 is getting the newer
imagery.
From a similar thread on talk...
right-click on the editing area and select 'Flush tile cache'.
Does anybody know if the link that we should use for Bing has changed for JOSM?
Only reason I'm asking is because Potlatch 2 and JOSM are right now showing
totally different imagery in some areas. Here's an
example:http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=40.81027&lon=-80.11468&zoom=16&layers=M
If
26 matches
Mail list logo