Hello, I am a new subscriber to this list. I live in the Atlanta, GA
area. I have been adding to OSM a little in my spare time but now it
seems to be getting closer to my work life.
I have worked a bit on adding OSM as a background layer to our GIS,
but today I found this mailing list with this
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Mark Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, I am a new subscriber to this list. I live in the Atlanta, GA
area. I have been adding to OSM a little in my spare time but now it
seems to be getting closer to my work life.
I have worked a bit on adding OSM as a
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:55 PM, Mark Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry to speak up before finding that the thread was older than I
realized. I have now gone back and found the whole conversation that
has been taking place.
I wasn't trying to be mean :). Just making sure you saw it.
It
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 8:48 PM, yellowbkpk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just about done importing the NHD Data into a PostGIS database and can
begin exporting to OSM format. Is there anyone out there that has already
imported NHD data or drawn water bodies/rivers themselves that would want me
I am the proud recipient of 42GB worth of hydrology data.
It appears that the data is in several .tar.gz files. I am working on
unpackaging the data right now. I imagine the next step would be to extract
the subbasins from the overall dataset, make sure the NHD - OSM script
works as we want it,
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:51 -0500, Ian Dees wrote:
I was going to modify Matthew's script here:
http://perrygeo.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/gis-bin/nhd_to_osm.py
to try and fix the issues that he described in the header:
- support holes in water bodies (islands)
- tag OSM data with all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is starting to show the data I uploaded yesterday:
http://tah.openstreetmap.org/Browse/?x=1971y=2935z=13layer=tile
It looks like the water bodies aren't given name tags.
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:17 PM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm 80 minutes away from finishing an
Ian,
When I zoom in, some of the rivers are labeled, others aren't. This
could just be a rendering issue. Do the names show up in the OSM file?
Or perhaps the original NHD data is simply missing names for those
features?
- matt
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:46 AM, Ian Dees [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 10:17 -0700, Karl Newman wrote:
That would be awesome. Maybe we could rip out the TIGER hydrographic
features and replace them with the NHD stuff. Maybe coastlines, too? I
guess we'd have to be careful about duplicating/overwriting people's
work, though.
Uh. There are
9 matches
Mail list logo
