On 6/26/2011 12:40 AM, Dion Dock wrote:
However, when I look at Mapnik, I want to see the way's intended use.
I'm sure there are plenty of counterexamples, but in my experience,
all paths allow pedestrians, while only some allow bikes and/or horses.
This renders nicely too: bikes get one
On 6/26/11 12:40 AM, Dion Dock wrote:
Here's my opinion, and we all know what opinions are worth. :)
I can understand why highway=path makes sense from a routing perspective.
However, when I look at Mapnik, I want to see the way's intended use. I'm sure
there are plenty of counterexamples,
On 06/20/2011 05:29 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
If a way is used for both pedestrians and cyclists, should it be tagged
highway=cycleway or highway=path with bicycle=designated? This is what
the bridge path looks like -
http://bikeportland.org/2005/11/21/hawthorne-bridge-gets-new-markings-673.
On
On 06/20/2011 05:39 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 6/20/11 8:29 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
I'm sure this was discussed ad nauseum at some point, so feel free to
point
me to the correct thread.
i would say that consensus was not achieved.
i personally favor highway=path and then
setting bicycle,
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:10:39 -0700
From: PJ Houser stephanie.jean.hou...@gmail.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Cc: osm-...@googlegroups.com, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] highway=cycleway or highway=path
Message-ID: BANLkTi=wktqodm2syffel-yznesus6n
On 6/21/2011 7:10 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
Well, I have a conundrum here in Portland, Oregon. The 4 TriMet mappers
here in Portland would prefer to tag all multi-use paths as paths, with
bicycle=designated, particularly because we are attempting to make the
Portland area routable. OpenTripPlanner,
)
--
Message: 1
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 20:39:49 -0400
From: Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] highway=cycleway or highway=path
Message-ID: 4dffe855.3030...@averillpark.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
On 6/20
Wanted to make sure talk-us gets this message from a non-member of talk-us.
:)
-- Forwarded message --
From: David Turner nova...@novalis.org
Date: Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: highway=cycleway or highway=path
To: osm-...@googlegroups.com
Cc:
From: David Turner nova...@novalis.org
Like any router, OTP requires clear rules for whether a cyclist or a
pedestrian may use a way. But OTP does not restrict what tags are used
to define these rules. That is configurable on a per-install basis.
So, if Portland are OSM editors decide that
If a way is used for both pedestrians and cyclists, should it be tagged
highway=cycleway or highway=path with bicycle=designated? This is what the
bridge path looks like -
http://bikeportland.org/2005/11/21/hawthorne-bridge-gets-new-markings-673.
On the
On 6/20/11 8:29 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
I'm sure this was discussed ad nauseum at some point, so feel free to point
me to the correct thread.
i would say that consensus was not achieved.
i personally favor highway=path and then
setting bicycle, foot, etc., to indicate access permissions as
On 6/20/2011 8:39 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
i personally favor highway=path and then
setting bicycle, foot, etc., to indicate access permissions as appropriate.
I agree - this is the approach taken with the JOSM preset, and will
thus gravitate toward a more exact definition as tag sets become
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 8:39 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 6/20/11 8:29 PM, PJ Houser wrote:
I'm sure this was discussed ad nauseum at some point, so feel free to
point
me to the correct thread.
i would say that consensus was not achieved.
Consensus for all of OSM or
13 matches
Mail list logo
