Any contributor interested in these Netto shops can edit the name, add an
operator tag or else to distinguish them.
If they are not interested or do not know better, then the should not do
anything.
If they are interested but not contributors, they can contribute.
Yves
Le 3 octobre 2017
Hi Andy,
Am 2017-09-27 um 17:57 schrieb Andy Townsend:
> On 27/09/2017 15:35, John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> The spatial information will tell you where each business location is;
>> it is not sufficient to tell you whether these are multiple locations
>> of the same brand, or two unrelated brands
If we would have stable ids, then this 'problem' could be resolved by
adding the foreign keys to our objects to Wikidata, which is their normal
way of operating.
It took me a few messages to explain to the Wikidata contributors that we
don't have stable ids and that the best way forward was to
On 27/09/2017 19:47, Marc Gemis wrote:
Is "the same geographical area" relevant ? Why should a data consumer
use a separate datebase to identify the brand of an item ?
Simply because some people had suggested that "brand:wikidata" was
unnecessary because you could always work out what brand
sent from a phone
> On 27. Sep 2017, at 23:09, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
>
> Martin, that specific Wikidata item may have some, possibly incomplete data,
> that can be easily fixed, but that's irrelevant. As I keep saying - the
> wikidata and wikipedia tags are no
>
> > Specifying Q125054 is the same as specifying "Aldi". If needed/wanted,
> it could be replaced with the more specific wikidata entry like Aldi Nord.
>
> no, it’s not the same, because this wikidata object suggests that there is
> one company, Aldi GmbH & Co. KG, with 2 seats, and one logo.
>
sent from a phone
> On 27. Sep 2017, at 22:04, Yuri Astrakhan wrote:
>
> Martin, you cannot make a general claim based on a single value.
I didn’t make a general claim based on this, I said it’s another example.
> Specifying Q125054 is the same as specifying
sent from a phone
On 27. Sep 2017, at 21:58, Andy Mabbett wrote:
>>> the only wikidata example I can
>>> find is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25716765
>
>> which btw. is another good example of misleading and wrong information via
>> wikidata.
>
> No, it's an
That's exactly what we are trying to do. Add another tag --
brand:wikidata=Q550258
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:10 PM, yvecai wrote:
> Excuse me, but what does wikidata do in this discussion ?
> If brand=wendy is different tham brand=wendy, and if somebody has a
> problem with
Excuse me, but what does wikidata do in this discussion ?
If brand=wendy is different tham brand=wendy, and if somebody has a
problem with is it, why not change the key, values or add another tag,
document it and voila ?
Yves
___
talk mailing list
Martin, you cannot make a general claim based on a single value. Users can
enter "Aldi", or "Aldi Nord" or "Aldi Sud". With different capitalization
and dashes, and with or without dots, and god knows what other creative
ways to misspell it. Specifying Q125054 is the same as specifying "Aldi".
If
On 27 September 2017 at 20:50, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> On 27. Sep 2017, at 17:57, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> the only wikidata example I can
>> find is https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/25716765
> which btw. is another good example of misleading
sent from a phone
> On 27. Sep 2017, at 17:57, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> In Germany both Aldi Nord and Aldi Sud operate, but these tend to be tagged
> in OSM as operator rather than brand, and the only wikidata example I can
> find is
Marc, I think you are confusing the goal and the means to get there. I
agree - the goal is to be able to globally find all Wendy's, so that when I
travel, I still can search for familiar brands. So the same brand should
have the same ID everywhere. That ID can be either textual or numeric.
Both
Am 27.09.2017 um 20:47 schrieb Marc Gemis:
>> Can anyone think of an example where two unrelated brands share the same
>> name and category of business in the same geographical area?
> Is "the same geographical area" relevant ? Why should a data consumer
> use a separate datebase to identify the
>
> Can anyone think of an example where two unrelated brands share the same
> name and category of business in the same geographical area?
Is "the same geographical area" relevant ? Why should a data consumer
use a separate datebase to identify the brand of an item ?
Suppose I want to find all
On 27/09/2017 15:35, John F. Eldredge wrote:
The spatial information will tell you where each business location is;
it is not sufficient to tell you whether these are multiple locations
of the same brand, or two unrelated brands that share the same name
and category of business.
Can anyone
17 matches
Mail list logo