Re[2]: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Maxim Masiutin
Hello Alexis! MM http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb154b16.rar But wich difference with v1.54 Beta/16 and v1.54 Beta/16a. Because name of rar is identical? : tb154b16.rar Beta/16 had a bug and was unable decrypt S/MIME messages at all, in Beta/16a it was fixed. --

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 15 Dec 2001 18:57:45, you wrote: It _will_ work, then plugins will be ready... What do you mean? It is suggestion that RITlabs will prepare some plugins? ;o Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 15 Dec 2001 23:07:26, you wrote: Yes, In The Bat, Pegasus, _maybe_ in OE... OE v. 5.xx and 6.xx seems to understand "message/partial" well. I tested it. Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\

Re[2]: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Marek Mikus
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Alexander Leschinsky wrote: On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:12:02 -0800 (16.12.2001 07:12 my local time) you wrote about beta/16, at least in part: NA Eudora is a Client that has implemented AVG If AVG have some published API - why not??? I see one bad thing in AVG -

Re: The Bat! - bug report

2001-12-16 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On 16 Dec 2001, 8:10:40 AM, Maurice Snellen wrote: Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/16a on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 what is beta 16a? Don't find it on in ftp site? -- Dwight A. Corrin P O Box 47828 Wichita KS 67201-7828 316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using

Re: Inconsistency with Sent folder

2001-12-16 Thread Maurice Snellen
On 16 Dec 2001, at 09:35:53 [GMT +0100] (which was 9:35 where I live) Lars Geiger wrote: LG Can anyone confirm? Confirmed here. -- Greetings, Maurice ICQ: 15724776 | WWW: http://www.kiap.org/ Using The Bat! v1.54 Beta/16a on Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 --

bug with selecting FROM field contents still present :-)

2001-12-16 Thread Dr. Sergey Uvarov
This was posted some ages ago :-), but still present. Bug: Where:In main window, when previewing message. click on field with sender info (after FROM) - it *looks* like unchecked (unselected, if you want) then switch to another program and back - it becomes checked (as it REALLY was) :-). It is

Re: The Bat! - bug report

2001-12-16 Thread Gnther Eisele
Hei, Dwight A Corrin wrote: what is beta 16a? Don't find it on in ftp site? see [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hello Alexis! MM http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb154b16.rar But wich difference with v1.54 Beta/16 and v1.54 Beta/16a. Because name of rar is identical? : tb154b16.rar

Re: A cosmetic improvement - missing menu navigator (was: A little cosmetic bug - missing menu navigator)

2001-12-16 Thread Lars Geiger
Hi Alexis, On 16 Dec 2001 at 15:41:38 [GMT +0100], you wrote: AH If you have an option (like : On exit compress folder) When you AH close TheBat!, during Cleaning up window, menu navigator button AH is missing. Actually, I could really live without this one. I don't use it, it only sits

Common Folders disappearing

2001-12-16 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, Here is an 'OH SH_T' A copy of all my mail was going into a separate account called 'master' and then being sorted into an 'Acrhive' folder. At the end of each month I would move the messages over from Archive into a sub folder containing

Re: The Bat! - bug report

2001-12-16 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Maurice, On Sunday, December 16, 2001, at 06:10:40 AM -0700, Maurice Snellen wrote the following in regards to The Bat! - bug report: NA If I open Options/Preferences and make any changes, or simply NA decide not to make any changes and choose Cancel instead, TB! NA locks up, and any

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Günther, On Sunday, December 16, 2001, at 03:20:32 AM -0700, Günther Eisele wrote the following in regards to beta/16: What could be a reason for doing so? No virus scanner can make sure that a mail is virus free, Ok, why not? You mean to say that if I scan a file/message with NAV or

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Gnther Eisele
Hei, Nick Andriash wrote: What could be a reason for doing so? No virus scanner can make sure that a mail is virus free, Ok, why not? Because a virus may spread a day before you get the corresponding virus updates or because it is a virus which changes it's code dynamically. But mainly the

Re[3]: The Bat! - bug report

2001-12-16 Thread Leslie Costar
Hello Mogens, On 16 Dec 2001, 11:35:31, you wrote: I have had this problem before, but I think it is a graphics card problem. Would you by any change have an ATI Rage 128 AGP? Why, Yes I do! I installed the driver from the CD rather than the one that comes with Windows 2K Since then, I

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Nick Andriash
Hello Günther, On Sunday, December 16, 2001, at 11:42:30 AM -0700, Günther Eisele wrote the following in regards to beta/16: Because a virus may spread a day before you get the corresponding virus updates or because it is a virus which changes it's code dynamically. But mainly the first

Re: beta/16

2001-12-16 Thread Gnther Eisele
Hei, Nick Andriash wrote: Then it's a stupid software which is used by people who don't know how a virus scanner (and/or viruses) work. It kind of reminds me of people using a personal firewall and saying my PC is safe and free of trojans. Calling Users who have AV Scanners and Firewalls

Virus protection

2001-12-16 Thread Peter Meyns
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001 18:31:54 +0200GMT (which was 17:31 +0100GMT where I live), Maxim Masiutin thought about beta/16 and wrote in another thread: [!] Virus Checker (see the options in the Options|Virus Checker dialogue) Just out of interest, what does the [!] mean ? MM It's a major