Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello CaLViN, >> A bad idea, it could make multiuser setups much more complicated. Just >> like in Mozilla it is ;). > I'm not sure how this would make multiuser complicated. Every user can > have his own complete directory, or only his won config files and > mailbase. Since every user has his ow

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread CaLViN
Hello Batters, >> - not to use the registry > A bad idea, it could make multiuser setups much more complicated. Just > like in Mozilla it is ;). I'm not sure how this would make multiuser complicated. Every user can have his own complete directory, or only his won config files and mailbase. Sinc

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Krzysztof Trybowski
Hello CaLViN, > - not to use the registry A bad idea, it could make multiuser setups much more complicated. Just like in Mozilla it is ;). > - not to use any absolute paths Possible right now, except for mailbase storage I think. -- / Krzysztof Trybowski pgp 0xE0F7733B /--/ To get my pgp

Re[2]: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Cees
Hallo Andreas, Op een dinsdag 3 juni 2003 om 2:03:37 schreef jij over "The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?": http://www.snurl.com/thebatch AR>>> This site gives an error 404 - Not found. :-( >> no, it does not it links to: >> http://www33.brinkster.com/urbotech/altres/varios.htm

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Andreas Rumpenhorst
Hello Cees, in your mail dated Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 01:57, you whispered something about "The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?": >>> http://www.snurl.com/thebatch AR>> This site gives an error 404 - Not found. :-( > no, it does not it links to: > http://www33.brinkster.com/urbote

Re[2]: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Cees
Hallo Andreas, Op een dinsdag 3 juni 2003 om 1:35:55 schreef jij over "The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?": AR> Hello Wolfgang, AR> in your mail dated Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 00:39, AR> you whispered something about "The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?": >> have you tried TheBatc

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Andreas Rumpenhorst
Hello Wolfgang, in your mail dated Tuesday, June 3, 2003, 00:39, you whispered something about "The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?": > have you tried TheBatch? > http://www.snurl.com/thebatch This site gives an error 404 - Not found. :-( -- Best regards, Andreas __

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Wolfgang
Hello CaLViN, have you tried TheBatch? http://www.snurl.com/thebatch Best regards, Wolfgang Current beta is 1.63b7 | "Using TBBETA" information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Re: The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread Michal Kosinski
B-stok/PL, Monday, June 2, 2003 Hello CaLViN, On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, at 16:40:20 (which was 22:40 where I live) in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote: > If not, I know that SecureBat does not use the registry to store > information (or at least not for all info). Would

The Bat "to go" - is this planned at all?

2003-06-03 Thread CaLViN
Hello Batters, I need to work on random computers in the next couple of month, and I'd like to use The Bat on each of these machines and on my home computer. Installing it on every machine and using backup/restore or the syncronize feature would be too complicated and slow for me, and as far as I

Re: Printing multiple mails

2003-06-03 Thread Kjartan Mannes
Monday, June 2, 2003, 7:59:50 PM, Mark Partous wrote: > Hello Kjartan, > Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote: KM>> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only KM>> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that KM>> are more than 1 page lon

Re: Printing multiple mails

2003-06-03 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Kjartan, Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote: KM> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only KM> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that KM> are more than 1 page long need to be printed individually. Only after sending my fir

Re: Printing multiple mails

2003-06-03 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Kjartan, Monday, June 2, 2003, 6:33:57 PM, you wrote: KM> Selecting multiple mails in the message list and printing them only KM> results in the first page of each mail being printed, so any mails that KM> are more than 1 page long need to be printed individually. Another solution might be

Re: Amazon Order #058-0397862-2653939

2003-06-03 Thread squabsy
On Mon, 2 Jun 2003 15:39:07 +0100, "Clive Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > RMN> The above Amazon order for "Selling Yourself: Be the Competent. . . > " > > Let me guess. The rest of the book's title reads ...emailer. :) Sometimes little exchanges on these lists make me LOL this was one of the

Re: Amazon Order #058-0397862-2653939

2003-06-03 Thread Richard M. Newman
Hello Clive, On Monday, June 02, 2003, 10:39:07 AM, you wrote: RMN>> The above Amazon order for "Selling Yourself: Be the Competent. RMN>> . . " C> Let me guess. The rest of the book's title reads ...emailer. :) 8-O Best, Richard Richard M. Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]