-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 12:12am -0400, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
JA It seems to me that RITLabs has just saved themselves a world of pain
JA for now.
You've just saved me from a lot of typing. Thank you! ;-)
That was exactly what I was going to say.
Just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun 27-Jul-03 11:35am -0400, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
At 12:33 AM on Sunday, July 27, 2003 it seems you posted the
following to [EMAIL PROTECTED] in regards to
%SETHEADER etc. macros:
How about an option to not show any X-Mailer?
Of course,
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
Just a little addition: providing an easy way to forge
X-Mailer/Received headers would immediately classify The Bat! as
spamware.
BM This just sounds like paranoia.
BM For sending mail, there are more than enough net tools available to
BM spammers the provide far
Bill Mccarthy, [BM] wrote:
BM X-Ray is a fine tool but is a bit buggy. I regularly run into it
BM hanging on output filtering when I send longer emails or emails with
BM attachments.
I've noted this as well. However, if you use X-Ray with a local
mailserver, negotiations are rapid and the
Hello Januk,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 00:06:50 -0700 (27.07.2003 13:06 my local time)
you wrote about Another take on v2,
at least in part:
JA What list was this posted on?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
JA Was the plug-in interface or sample code posted somewhere?
AFAIK - stefan was done it in TBDEV
Hello Allie,
I do think that this falls out of the scope of a simple MUA. This sort
of processing should be done by the MTA, nuh? It would seem that with
a good mailserver you should be happy. :) It would do all you want,
i.e.,. MDaemon is certainly capable of all that.
There are other
Hello Stefan,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 at 16:44:26 you wrote:
I've thousand of dupes here that aren't detected as dupes
SR Same Folder?
Yes, of course ;-)
--
Regards, Alain
The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11
Windows 2000 5.0 Build
Greg Strong, [GS] wrote:
GS There are other things to consider such as available ISPs, their
GS TOS, your individual purpose for email, and costs. If you use email
GS professionally, then you may want a business account that provides
GS the ability to have your own mailserver.
You don't need a
On 2003-07-27 (16:05), you wrote:
All in this case means *only* non-encrypted connections on the standard
port :-)
Non-encrypted: yes - it doesn't check. But you can define any port.
Best regards, Krzysztof Kudacik
--
pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! |
Hello Allie,
You don't need a 'business' account to use your own mailserver. I've
never had a business account and my only regret is that I took so long
to start using my own mailserver. It was actually saving me money in
the early stages of using one since it avoided my having to pay for an
Hello tbbeta,
Can anyone reproduce this problem.
In Account Properties - Mail management, make sure that Delete
recieved messages from server is checked. Also set a short interval
for periodical checking of the mailbox, to speed up the testing.
Create a Selective Download filter with these
Hello list,
I just created anther account. At the moment i only need 1 QT (a
reply QT). I copied and pasted an existing one and altered that. But
it refuses to kick in:
if i set it up at account level: nothing
if i set it up at folder level: nothing
AB is still empty so no need at
Greg Strong, [GS] wrote:
I'm cc'ing this response to TBOT so we can continue there.
GS Ok my error. I should have simply stated you need a ISP whose
GS internet gateway will provide the ability for having a mailserver. I
GS should probably check into such an account due to my interest here.
I
Hello Allie,
GS I have to many Pop accounts. Once they are set up in TB it isn't
GS much of a problem, but still to many. I'd like to check into your
GS configuration, but it would require a change in my ISP.
Why?
I believe the TOS expressly states use of enterprise solutions. ISPs in
the
Hello Bill,
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 15:39 GMT -0400, engineers were awed when
Bill Mccarthy [BM] constructed:
BM First of all, you are only addressing pre-Inbox (not pre-Outbox)
BM filtering.
Very true, which is why I said it might not be elegant enough.
BM Secondly, this approach, AFAIK,
Hello Alexander,
On Sunday, July 27, 2003 at 14:55 GMT +0600, authorities charged
Alexander Leschinsky [AL] for writing:
JA Was the plug-in interface or sample code posted somewhere?
AL AFAIK - stefan was done it in TBDEV after beta8
Ah, it appears I missed it in the archives[*]. Hmm, I could
16 matches
Mail list logo
