Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?

"Dierk Haasis" wrotes on 10/01/2005 at 21:25:30 +1100 subject "BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?" : > Hello Graham! > On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 11:12:46 AM you wrote: >> As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the >> message in the UI says "is DNS count ABOVE n",

Re: Bayes Filter 2.0.1 - DNS Blacklist

"Stuart Cuddy" wrotes on 11/01/2005 at 11:32:05 +1100 subject "Bayes Filter 2.0.1 - DNS Blacklist" : > Is this normal? Does it mean that it is not finding the different > lists or that it is not finding the address at these locations? > > DNS-Blacklist request started... > bl.spamcop.net: (Autho

Bayes Filter 2.0.1 - DNS Blacklist

Hello tbbeta, Is this normal? Does it mean that it is not finding the different lists or that it is not finding the address at these locations? DNS-Blacklist request started... bl.spamcop.net: (Authoritative answer host not found.) relays.ordb.org: (Authoritative answer host not found.) sbl-xbl.s

Target of outgoing filters not adjusting when moving folders

Just added the following as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4206 ,- | When I move a folder, incoming filters pointing to this folder are | automatically adjusted to point to the new location. | | Outgoing filters are not but should be. | | I have not tried this with read or replied fi

Re[2]: Antispam Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)

Hi TBBETA, S> On 05 January 2005 at 16:38:38GMT +0100, Achim Winkler sent an E-Mail S> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on the subject of "Antispam S> Bayes Filter Plugin 2.0.1 (Open Source)": S> When I use the Macro the output doesn't line up correctly - is there S> a way to achieve this or is it a bug? I

Re[2]: Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello Jernej, On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 you wrote in JS> BSOD usually means that one of your drivers crashed. Try updating JS> all of them to the most recent versions, and hope that this fixes JS> it. Did that only three days ago :-( -- Regards, Richard | The Bat! 3.0.2.10 &

Re[2]: Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello Alexander, On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 you wrote in ASK> Its still a stream over the net, that shouldn't make a difference, or do I ASK> misunderstand this? Well I thought, when I listen to a backdated programme, it is downloaded in one go as there are never any breaks whil

Folder Maintenance hangs on IMAP account

Hello TBBETA, While running the Folder | Maintenance for all accounts and folders the routine hangs on an IMAP account Inbox folder. The options chosen were 'Check Integrity/Repair', 'Remove Duplicates', 'Purge old/exceeding messages', and 'Compress (remove deleted messages)'. In the 'Report' sect

Re: Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello Richard Wakeford & everyone else, on 10-Jan-2005 at 22:02 you (Richard Wakeford) wrote: > Yup, occasional drop outs but it works most of the time. Should have > added that the same problem occurs when I listen to a programme that has > been pre recorded (not by me but, in this case the BBC)

Re: Radio causes blue screen of death

On Monday, January 10, 2005, 21:22:39, Richard Wakeford wrote: > This is 100% repeatable for me. When I listen to the radio on line I > can't use TB! at all. This isn't TB's problem - BSOD usually means that one of your drivers crashed. Try updating all of them to the most recent versions, and ho

Re[2]: Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello Alexander, On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 you wrote in ASK> You mean you're playing internet radio streams? With a built-in analogue ASK> modem? r-r-r-really? Yup, occasional drop outs but it works most of the time. Should have added that the same problem occurs when I listen

Re: Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello Richard Wakeford & everyone else, on 10-Jan-2005 at 21:22 you (Richard Wakeford) wrote: > This is 100% repeatable for me. When I listen to the radio on line You mean you're playing internet radio streams? With a built-in analogue modem? r-r-r-really? > I can't use TB! at all. Even just sc

Radio causes blue screen of death

Hello, This is 100% repeatable for me. When I listen to the radio on line I can't use TB! at all. Even just scrolling through messages causes a Blue Screen and automatic reboot. I can normally read about 3 or 4 messages before this happens. The strange thing is that this never happened when I was

Re: Mod: Top posting

Stuart, On 10-01-2005 16:49, you [SH] wrote in : PF>> Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that PF>> version has a number of bugs. SH> So what do you want, a rushed version that may still have big holes in SH> it or to wait a while for one which, we

Re: Mod: Top posting

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 PF> Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that PF> version has a number of bugs. So what do you want, a rushed version that may still have big holes in it or to wait a while for one which, we /all/ hope, has these major problem

Re: Mod: Top posting

Stuart, On 10-01-2005 09:55, you [SH] wrote in : SH> So what? I'd happily wait as long again for a full release that was SH> - relatively - bug free and functional. Why the rush? Because IMAP sucks in anything later than 3.0.1.33 and even in that version has a number of bug

Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?

Hello Graham! On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 11:12:46 AM you wrote: > As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the > message in the UI says "is DNS count ABOVE n", then by increasing it > to 8 are you really just disabling the blacklisting? (or have you > added more sites?)

Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?

Hello Dierk > To relieve oneself from too much false positives is to increase the > number of hits for classifying as spam from the default 2; I use 8 > since 4 was still too low. As the default install only comes with 8 blacklist sites, and the message in the UI says "is DNS count ABOVE n", then

Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?

Hello Graham! On Monday, January 10, 2005 at 10:20:11 AM you wrote: > Dierk & Ethan seem to have a problem about being blacklisted too :-( It's not us or our domains specifically. After reading up on it I guess it is pure coincidence if anyone - in this case me and Ethan - get filtered; looks li

Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more aggressive?

Hello Fabio SR>> Nope, not here, no false positives here since installing it. > ven, gen 07 2005, 00:02:10, DNS-BLACKLISTED, Message-ID: > [EMAIL PROTECTED], From: Sean Rima > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Subject: Re: BayesFilter 201: Much more > aggressive?, Score: 100, Reason: cached DNS request Mon, Ja

Re: Mod: Top posting (was: Next Beta or Release)

EJM> The question still remains. We are now into the second week of EJM> January. So what? I'd happily wait as long again for a full release that was - relatively - bug free and functional. Why the rush? -- Stuart Hemming Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Aided