Re[7]: Exchange & Usability

Hello Goncalo, >>> In reply to : > OMG... why wasn't that made configurable? The difference between the two > is > the extension and nothing else. V Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach, V rename and attach again. >>> Do

Re[2]: Exchange & Usability

In reply to : ASK> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Why not create a filter that does so on a hotkey? ASK> I appreciate the creativity in seeking for workarounds for the ASK> problem, but no matter how hard you try,

Re[6]: Exchange & Usability

In reply to : V> Hello Goncalo, >> In reply to : OMG... why wasn't that made configurable? The difference between the two is the extension and nothing else. V>>> Open the original mail, Forward, in the editor window save the attach, V>

Re: Webmail, that threads correctly

Hello Vili, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:25:04 -0400 GMT (13/07/2005, 00:25 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V> Thank, we solved this case ca. 2 weeks ago :)) But thank you. I am V> using GMail now. OK, I was out of the country and just came back. -- Cheers, Thomas. What to not say to the nice policeman: I

Re: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello Ivan, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 21:10:44 +0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 23:10 +0700 GMT), Ivan wrote: >> Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the >> same IP address (localhost = 127.1.1.0), a conflict occurs. I> 127.0.0.1 ;) Of course. ;-) I> I have many accounts(5-10) with s

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Peter, V>> Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): > Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written > to you... :-) :)) I wrote that to him... :) It was about problem related to creation of the 1st mail in the Outbox. :) -- Vili

Re: Help Project

Hello Dennis, On Thu, 9 Jun 2005 06:11:52 -0400 GMT(6/9/2005, 5:11 AM -0600 GMT), per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dennis Hays wrote: > We're diligently working away behind the scenes. A little slow down > due to some personal commitments and a broken computer (now fixed). > I'll post a newer PDF later

External Exception

Howdy Flying Rodent fans, Now I have no idea what causes this but I loaded up my bat today and thought hmm the processors doing something intensive, and for some reason couldn't seem to do much with TB!. So I fiddle around trying to find the culprit, stopping avg etc.. Still up the cr

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Vili, On 12-07-2005 22:50, you [V] wrote in : V> Just FYI, I sent 9Val this (I am too working with him on it :))): Sounds good - although I didn't understand much of what he has written to you... :-) -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.5.21 Pro MyGate, AVG ~11 POP

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:31:29 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 22:31 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PH> Account settings/Files and Directories. But it is only available PH> when NOT using OTFE! That explains why I couldn't find it. -- Groetjes, Roelof As I feared, you have no sense of humor

Re[2]: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hello Peter, > On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in > : >>> - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often >>> leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in >>> the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing.

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Hello Peter! On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 2:35 PM, you wrote: PH>> But TB only compresses a folder, if there is a deleted message! > I have just filed a report here: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4896 > Can anybody confirm this bug on the BT? Peter, I have followed your steps. TB! c

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:37:23 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 12:37 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PH> - When "Bind attachements only when sending out mail" is checked, TB Bear with please. Though I remember playing with that setting a couple of betas ago, I can't find right now. -- Groetje

Re[3]: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

martes, 12 jul 2005 at 12:17, it seems you wrote: > At home OTFE, POP3/IMAP mixed. The account in question is POP3. > On my laptop PLAIN (TB is on an excrypted virtual disc), POP3. > Both show the same behaviour (i.e. no folder compression after simply > deletig an attachment) Here OTFE and

Re[2]: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Het was op dinsdag 12 juli 2005 om 21:35 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'Compressing a folder after removing an attachment' : Hallo Peter, PH>> But TB only compresses a folder, if there is a deleted message! PH> I have just filed a report here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4896 PH> C

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Jonathan, On 12-07-2005 16:27, you [JA] wrote in : >> - I don't use a server side Outbox. It's just troublesome and often >> leads to multiple messages being sent and multiple messages being in >> the outbox when using the intermittent save option while composing. JA> I've

Re[2]: Webmail, that threads correctly

Hello Thomas, > On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 03:51:47 +0200 GMT (01/07/2005, 08:51 +0700 GMT), > Vili wrote: V>> Could you offer me a FREE webmail with POP3 access that I could get an V>> email from and if I write, I dont mess up the thread on this list? V>> Anyone using something like this? > You can u

Re: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Marek Mikus wrote: I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. But it was very hard to detect this, I hope, Ritlabs will improve this error message to display, which account are in conflict. All I think could be done here -- and it *should* be done -- is to add on the error message

Re[2]: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello, Thomas! I>> By default all accounts have the same ports ;) > Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the > same IP address (localhost = 127.1.1.0), a conflict occurs. 127.0.0.1 ;) I have many accounts(5-10) with settings equal 127.0.0.1:110. And usually all is ok. I

Re: character sets

Hello Den, On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:50:28 +0500 GMT (04/07/2005, 21:50 +0700 GMT), Den V. Yafyasov wrote: DVY> Wrong auto-detecting character set in html-messages, as a result a bad DVY> symbols in replay message. I saw your pics, but not being able to read Cyrillic, I don't know what your problem

Re: Webmail, that threads correctly

Hello Vili, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 03:51:47 +0200 GMT (01/07/2005, 08:51 +0700 GMT), Vili wrote: V> Could you offer me a FREE webmail with POP3 access that I could get an V> email from and if I write, I dont mess up the thread on this list? V> Anyone using something like this? You can use your e

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Jonathan, On 12/07/2005 09:27 AM -0500, you wrote: > See, this is where I get confused. On my settings, I have "don't > synchronize" on all, and I don't have it set to peek inside certain > folders for mail counts, and yet it still goes inside every folder to > see the contents. I'm guessing

Re: Test x-rogue

Hello Raymund, On Thu, 7 Jul 2005 21:25:16 +0200 GMT (08/07/2005, 02:25 +0700 GMT), Raymund Tump wrote: RT> But a :rogue: is nothing more than a smiley for TB! and so it can't RT> choose to display it or not. Smileys are displayed in the message body. Rogues are displayed in the grey header. Yes

Re: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello Ivan, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 15:34:49 +0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 17:34 +0700 GMT), Ivan wrote: >> I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. I> By default all accounts have the same ports ;) Yes, but on different IP addresses. If the same port is used on the same IP address (localhost =

Re[3]: IMAP: -1,-2

Hello Stuart, MM>> yes, I have set 10 connections and see all from one to ten. > Is it because I only have a couple of folders. As I learnt yesterday :), you have to restart TB! to make that connection number change effective. -- Vili __

Re: Edit shortcuts (was: 3.5.36)

Hello Stuart, On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 21:44:51 -0500 GMT (12/07/2005, 09:44 +0700 GMT), Stuart Cuddy wrote: TF>> I know I need to use RMB on toolbar / Customise / etc to edit TF>> shortcuts. However, this makes the function unaccessable to newbies. TF>> Any chance we can get a menu item "Edit shortcu

Re: another reason for the ability to edit incoming mail

Hello Dwight, On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 11:42:48 -0500 GMT (01/07/2005, 23:42 +0700 GMT), Dwight A Corrin wrote: DAC> I have been gradually changing subscriptions over from my various POP DAC> accounts to fastmail. I just received a confirmation message, which I DAC> would like to edit because it tells

Re[2]: IMAP: -1,-2

Hello Marek, Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 9:24:58 AM, you wrote: MM> yes, I have set 10 connections and see all from one to ten. Is it because I only have a couple of folders. -- Stuartmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.51 on Windows 98 4.10 Build A

Re: IMAP don'ts to get things working better

Hi Allie Martin, On Saturday, July 02, 2005, you wrote: I've been playing some serious catch up. Work is being incredibly evil, so I'm having issues keeping up at the moment > I've been using TB! IMAP quite comfortably. As have I more recently. > However, I'm now having an Inbox problem tha

Re: IMAP: -1,-2

Hello all, Tuesday, July 12, 2005, Stuart Cuddy wrote: >>7/12/2005, 09:16:01: IMAP - 1: >>7/12/2005, 09:16:10: IMAP - 2: > Is this two different connections. If so I have it set to use 3 > connections, but I have never seen -3. Does any one else see higher > numbers? yes, I have set 10 connec

IMAP: -1,-2

Hello tbbeta, What do the -1 and -2 mean as in the following: >7/12/2005, 09:16:01: IMAP - 1: >7/12/2005, 09:16:10: IMAP - 2: Is this two different connections. If so I have it set to use 3 connections, but I have never seen -3. Does any one else see higher numbers? -- Best regards, Stuart

Re: [OT] It worries me...

Hello Alexander, On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:10:41 +0200 GMT (30/06/2005, 00:10 +0700 GMT), Alexander S. Kunz wrote: ASK> I think the beta version always were somewhat bigger than the release ASK> versions, maybe they contain extra debug hunks or whatever... You wish... -- Cheers, Thomas. We have

Re: exchange and usability

On Tuesday, July 12, 2005, 3:26:29 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: DAC>> From: Slate Magazine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: DAC>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Saturday, July 9, 2005, 5:10:53 AM DAC>> Subject: Today's Papers: Notes from the Underground > Isn't included to your HTML part. Probably wasn't part of the

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On 7/12/05, Alexander S. Kunz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:36:40 +0200, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly > > 2.5Gb storage with Gmail, Ritlabs is recommending a spammed 300Mb > > storage on Lycos?

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 12:36:40 +0200, Jay Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly 2.5Gb storage with Gmail, Ritlabs is recommending a spammed 300Mb storage on Lycos? Yes, and they force you to use it! -- Alex. __

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

7/12/2005 6:41 AM Hi Peter, On 7/12/2005 Peter Hampf wrote: PH> IMO it must be possible to compress a folder after removing an attachment PH> from any message. Seems logical to me as a programmer. I have found it significantly more valuable to store attachments in a separate folder. Compr

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

On 7/12/05, Miroslav Florensen wrote: > > How can we request that? > > German - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_de > English - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_en > French - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_fr So let me get this straight. Instead of free POP3 access and nearly 2.5Gb storage wi

Re[3]: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello, Marek! >>> I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further >>> description about this error is missing. > I found conflict, two accounts used the same port. By default all accounts have the same ports ;) I rarely got same message. I thought that is because rss2mail 1.3 insta

Re[2]: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello all, Tuesday, July 12, 2005, Roelof Otten wrote: > That's nothing special. In general all accounts are using the same > port and TB has no problem whatsoever to address the same server on > the same port at the same time. both had localhost and port 1110. > The error's more likely to be r

Re: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hallo Marek, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 11:48:35 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 11:48 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> This is a WinSock error. It means the socket in question (which one, I >> do not know, but I would guess it is related to TB!) is already in use. MM> I found conflict, two accounts used the s

Re[2]: Error "Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted"

Hello all, Monday, July 11, 2005, hggdh wrote: >> I saw this error message today during TB's start, any further >> description about this error is missing. >> >> Max, what this means? >> >> > This is a WinSock error. It means the socket in question (which one, I > do not know, but I would guess

Re: Exchange & Usability

On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:15:10 +0200, Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I just timed the process and I saved the message and forwarded it to myself as a .msg file in about 12 seconds. ASK> Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-) Why not create a filter that does so on a hotkey? I app

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 10:46:50 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 10:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> I could pick both 'compress' and 'purge and compress' from the context >> menu after merely deleting an attachment. I tried it from the menu tooand >> that was also working. PH> I tried it us

Re: Lycos mail plugin....

Hello Goncalo, > How can we request that? German - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_de English - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_en French - http://www.ritlabs.com/lycos_ex_fr -- best regards Miroslav BAT-MAIL.DE.VU - http://bat-mail.de.vu News-Ticker: http://thebat.orgavision.de/bat-mail

Re: exchange and usability

Hallo Dwight, On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 16:46:01 -0500GMT (11-7-2005, 23:46 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DAC> sorry won't thread, but wanted to forward this, and ask why this isn't DAC> a perfectly acceptable way to forward an html message Well, that's because this: DAC> From: Slate Magazine <[EM

Re: Compressing a folder after removing an attachment

Hallo Peter, On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 08:44:33 +0200GMT (12-7-2005, 8:44 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PH> when I delete a large attachment (which is stored inside the message body) PH> from a message the folder must be compressed in order to free the used PH> space. That's right. PH> But

Re: Exchange & Usability

Hallo Alexander, On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 23:51:55 +0200GMT (11-7-2005, 23:51 +0200, where I live), you wrote: >> I just timed the process and I saved the message and forwarded it to >> myself as a .msg file in about 12 seconds. ASK> Come on, I bet you can do it in 11! :-) Why not create a filter th