Hello Zeynel A. Öztürk everyone else,
on 26-Nov-2005 at 02:48 you (Zeynel A. Öztürk) wrote:
Confirmations?
Same here, yes.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
You're caught in a labyrinth of choice and possibility in the world
today, so you have more
Hello Sean Rima everyone else,
on 26-Nov-2005 at 00:59 you (Sean Rima) wrote:
Do you haver the download url for 62.14
Its the current release version on the Ritlabs download page.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Would there be this eternal seeking if
Hello MAU,
I rely quite a bit on VFs for my normal work, so it looks like I will
have to revert to 3.62.14. I could live with having to manually refresh
VFs, but having to re-start TB each time to make sure a VF is refreshed
is just too much.
I have just added my previous message as a Note
Hello Zeynel,
In Folder Properties, there isn't any big box seen in template,
forward and reply tabs, everything is in white. See attachment.
Confirmed. With Default and other themes.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Hendrik,
TB! 3.63.05 allows opening of all kind of files, even if it should be
prohibited by
Options-Preferences-Protection
Confirmed here. I can open an *.exe file here without any kind of
warning.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta)
Hello Mark,
± 7500 messages
23 accounts
search for Acronis in the text of the files.
finds 39 mails in 11 folders of 2 accounts
takes 1 min 59 seconds.
± 36000 messages
4 accounts
search for rightpixel in Text
finds 87 mails in 14 folders of 2 accounts
takes 1 min 34 secs.
I don't
Hello Vili,
From: MAU on TBBeta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'd better take a look at your templates :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current beta is
Hello MAU,
This is not new to 3.62.14. I have experienced this since many moons and
versions ago but I think I never reported it.
Add BT report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5393
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1
Hello MAU,
If anyone would care to 'waste' some time, I'd like to get at least one
confirmation before logging a BT report.
Although no one confirmed or not confirmed, but I can now fully reproduce
the reported problem with 3.63.05, I have logged BT report:
Clive Taylor wrote:
Agree 100%. However, the key word is if and this is the continuing
frustration with TB!. But, is Ritlab's focus on developing TB!? The
promised focus on IMAP has been dangled in front of this group for
what seems a lifetime but I've seen precious little evidence of this.
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 at 10:44:07 +0100, (which is
26.11.2005 at 11:44:07 +2000 where I live), you wrote:
Confirmed. With Default and other themes.
I've opened bug report at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5395
--
Best regards,
Zeynel
:flag-turkey:
Running The Bat! v3.63.05
Hello MAU,
Hello Vili,
From: MAU on TBBeta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You'd better take a look at your templates :)
Shooot... SORRY
I got an email from a customer and played with the template to try it
out... You were right :))) Sorry, again. I managed to sent out two
mails, one with MAU,
Hello George,
Friday, November 25, 2005, 10:03:56 PM, you wrote:
The move in, move out, move up, move down is very problematic. Is there
already a BT entry or should I create a new one?
I opened a case at bt. (https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5396)
The problem exists when moving folders
jueves, 24 nov 2005 at 12:13, it seems you wrote:
How the SMTP server is handled? I mean you go here and there,
different SMTP servers. When will be possible to set SMTP server on
the program level, and specify individual SMTP setting, if necessary?
Good idea. For now you could
When TB will support it?
Current beta is 3.63.05 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Hello MAU,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 10:59:09 AM, you wrote:
± 7500 messages
23 accounts
search for Acronis in the text of the files.
finds 39 mails in 11 folders of 2 accounts
takes 1 min 59 seconds.
M ± 36000 messages
M 4 accounts
M search for rightpixel in Text
M finds 87 mails in
Hello MAU,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 6:26:00 AM, you wrote:
MoT Are you sure? When did you compress the folders last time. I searched
MoT for Acronis using my 60 000 mails, it took 1:30.
My archived mail is in Mailbag Assistant, so I will never have 6 mails in
TB! :-)
But mine are in ±
Hello Vili,
Shooot... SORRY
No problem :)
I hope you agree with me about the search speed,...
Yes, there has been a noticeable improvement.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Mark,
MoT Are you sure? When did you compress the folders last time. I searched
MoT for Acronis using my 60 000 mails, it took 1:30.
My archived mail is in Mailbag Assistant, so I will never have 6 mails in
TB! :-)
But mine are in ± 300 folders, perhaps that explains part of the
Hello NetVicious,
How the SMTP server is handled? I mean you go here and there,
different SMTP servers. When will be possible to set SMTP server on
the program level, and specify individual SMTP setting, if necessary?
Good idea. For now you could use if you want my freeware
Hello MAU,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 11:01:06 AM, you wrote:
From: MAU on TBBeta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M You'd better take a look at your templates :)
Of course, my reply seemed to be addressed to MAU, even though I knew Vili
was trying to play an imposter.
Would-be imposters should better
Hello Mark,
It seems that most of the time is lost going from one folder/account to
another so that 5000 messages in one folder are searched through faster than
10 x 500 messages in seperate accounts/folders, which wouldn't be unlogical
(I think).
I also had less accounts and folders when I
Hello Zeynel,
Confirmed. With Default and other themes.
I've opened bug report at
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5395
I've confirmed there also.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Mark,
Would-be imposters should better restrain from using Rogues (see attachement)
... :-)
Or replace Rogues to one using a Halloween mask ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello all,
I was trying to repeat a search I had previously done with Message
Finder and I could not find it either from Edit/Use previous
conditions or even the search strings from the dropdown list for Text,
Subject, etc.
I have just realised that TB keeps a different 'history' for each
Hello Mark,
From: MAU on TBBeta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M You'd better take a look at your templates :)
Of course, my reply seemed to be addressed to MAU, even though I knew Vili
was trying to play an imposter.
Would-be imposters should better restrain from using Rogues (see attachement)
... :-)
Hello MAU,
Don't you think that this history of searches should be unique and
global?
It should be global.
Search can be account specific, I search mainly only one account, but
the stored search history should be global.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag
MAU wrote:
M Don't you think that this history of searches should be unique and
M global? I would certainly prefer so as, otherwise, I have to
M remember which account had focus when I did the search or change to
M different accounts to try to find it.
Not the way I use The Bat! In my setup,
Hello George,
M Don't you think that this history of searches should be unique and
M global? I would certainly prefer so as, otherwise, I have to
M remember which account had focus when I did the search or change to
M different accounts to try to find it.
Not the way I use The Bat! In my
Hello Vili,
Don't you think that this history of searches should be unique and
global?
It should be global.
As soon as a third person agrees I'll log a BT wish :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 17:47:10 +0100 GMT (26/11/2005, 23:47 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
It should be global.
M As soon as a third person agrees I'll log a BT wish :)
Count me in. I also believe that this is the way 3.0.1.33 works in the
office. I'm often not sure in which account to
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 01:21:22 +0100 GMT (26/11/2005, 07:21 +0700 GMT),
Peter Ouwehand wrote:
HO It gives a warning if double extension is detected, but allows
HO executing even of exe-attachments.
PO Hasn't TB 'always' (as long as I can remember) behaved like this ??
PO You got the
Hello MAU!
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 10:47 AM, you wrote:
Don't you think that this history of searches should be unique and
global?
It should be global.
As soon as a third person agrees I'll log a BT wish :)
I agree!
Am I number three? ;)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.63.05
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 10:45:20 AM, MAU wrote:
But if I am allowed to search on multiple accounts I really believe
that history should be global.
At the office, we have eight phone lines in. If you use the recall
button the phone, it recalls the last number dialed on that line
rather
Hello MAU,
A reminder of what MAU typed on:
Saturday, November 26, 2005 at 16:52:44 GMT +0100
M I was trying to repeat a search I had previously done with Message
M Finder and I could not find it either from Edit/Use previous
M conditions or even the search strings from the dropdown list for
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 26-Nov-2005 at 18:10 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
Am I number three? ;)
No, you're 7 minutes after Thomas.
No cookie! :)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Deliplayer2 is playing: Artificial Island (5:11) by Carbon Based
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 11:34 AM, you wrote:
Am I number three? ;)
No, you're 7 minutes after Thomas.
No cookie! :)
But, I'm Number One Chick! ;)
LOL
Have some coffee on me, :batcoffee: !
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service
Hello tbbeta,
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5397
When you access the properties of an account the setting for Mark
Messages as read after x seconds gets changed to Mark Messages as
read after viewing in Full Screen. It is then not easily, if at all
possible to change it back.
Hello Stuart!
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 11:57 AM, you wrote:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5397
When you access the properties of an account the setting for Mark
Messages as read after x seconds gets changed to Mark Messages as
read after viewing in Full Screen. It is then
Hello Mary,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 12:40:14 PM, you wrote:
MB Confirmed, using both my TB! accounts. Changing the tick mark back to
MB Mark Messages as read after x seconds will not stick.
MB I'm adding a note to your BT report.
Yes, I have had someone else confirm a problem, although not
Hello Alexander,
Saturday, November 26, 2005, 8:55:37 AM, you wrote:
Hello Sean Rima everyone else,
on 26-Nov-2005 at 00:59 you (Sean Rima) wrote:
Do you haver the download url for 62.14
Its the current release version on the Ritlabs download page.
DOH!!! :)
Sean
--
Hello Mary,
Am I number three? ;)
No, but you can still support the wish at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5398 :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v3.62.14 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Thomas,
M As soon as a third person agrees I'll log a BT wish :)
Count me in. I also believe that this is the way 3.0.1.33 works in the
office. I'm often not sure in which account to search, and first
choose the wrong one. Another account is just a tickmark away, I use
the search
Hello Dwight,
It seems to me that what you are asking for here is logical and the
way it should work. It's just what I'd wish for for the phones as
well.
I don't know if RIT can do it for the phones, but here is a wish you can
support https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5398
--
Best
Hello Stuart,
M I have just realised that TB keeps a different 'history' for each
M account. When setting focus to the proper account I could find my
M search alright.
Did you exit the message finder before you tried this. I noticed that
a search does not seem to show up again until after you
Hello MAU!
On Saturday, November 26, 2005, 5:01 PM, you wrote:
Am I number three? ;)
No, but you can still support the wish at:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5398 :)
Done, this 26th day of November, 2005. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.63.05 (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600
Hello MAU,
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 00:00:32 +0100 GMT (27/11/2005, 06:00 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M Take a look at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5398 :)
Looked - and supported. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
I live in my own little world, but it's ok, they know me here.
Hello MAU,
On Sat, 26 Nov 2005 16:28:53 +0100 GMT (26/11/2005, 22:28 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M The only way to tell is by comparing oranges to oranges. I have just
M repeated with 3.62.14 the search I mention and it takes 2 min. and 50
M seconds vs. the 1 min and 34 secs with 3.63.05.
With all
48 matches
Mail list logo
